A participatory approach to design a toolbox to support forest management planning at regional level

Forest Systems

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 340-358

  Marques, A F ^a,b   Borges, J G ^b   Garcia Gonzalo, J ^b   Lucas, B ^c   Melo, I ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE AGRONOMIA   (Portugal)

^c Mediterranean Regional Office of the European Forest Institute (EFIMED)   (Spain)

^d ACHAR Associação dos Agricultores da Charneca   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Decision support systems; Enterprise architecture; Forest management; Multiple stakeholders; Participatory process

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880945201     PISSN: 21715068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5424/fs/2013222-03120     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ananda J, Herath G, 2003. Incorporating stakeholder values into regional forest planning: a value function approach. Ecological Economics 45: 75-90.
2. Baptista FO, Santos R, 2005. Os proprietários florestais: resultados de un inquérito. Celta, Oeiras. 94 pp.
3. Borges JG, Hoganson HM, Rose DW, 1999. Combining a decomposition strategy with dynamic programming to solve spatially constrained forest management scheduling problems. Forest Science 45: 201-212.
4. Constantino M, Martins I, Borges JG, 2008. A new mixedinteger programming model for harvest scheduling subject to maximum area restrictions. Operations Research 56(3): 542-551.
5. Costa A, Oliveira AC, Vidas F, Borges JG, 2010. An approach to cork oak forest management planning in Southwestern Portugal. European Journal of Forest Research 129: 233-241.
6. De Steiguer J, Liberti L, Schuler A, Hansen B, 2003. Multi-criteria decision models for forestry and natural resources management: an annotated bibliography newtown Square, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. 32 pp.
7. Díaz-Balteiro L, Romero C, 2008. Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: a review and an assessment. Forest Ecology and Management 235: 3222-3241.
8. Falcão A, Borges JG, 2002. Combining random and systematic search heuristic procedures for solving spatially constrained forest management scheduling models. Forest Science 48(3): 608-621.
9. Falcão A, Próspero dos Santos M, Borges JG, 2006. A realtime visualization tool for forest ecosystem management decision support. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture 53: 3-12.
10. Ferreira L, Constantino M, Borges JG, 2011. Optimizing the management of Pinus pinaster stand, under risk of fire. An application in Portugal. Annals of Operational Research.
11. Forsell N, Wikström P, García F, Sabbadin R, Blennow K, Eriksson LO, 2009. Management of the risk of wind damage in forestry: a graph-based Markov decision process approach. Annals of Operations Research.
12. García-Gonzalo J, Pukkala T, Borges JG, 2011. Integrating fire risk in stand management scheduling. An application to Maritime pine stands in Portugal. Annals of Operational Research.
13. Grimble R, Wellard K, 1997. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural systems 55(2): 173-193.
14. Hjorts CN, 2004. Enhancing public participation in natural resource management using Soft OR an application of strategic option development and analysis in tactical forest planning. European Journal of Operational Research. 152: 667-683.
15. Kangas A, Kangas J, Kurttila M, 2008. Decision support for forest management (Gadow K, Pukkala T, Tomé M, eds). Managing Forest Ecosystems Vol 16. Springer. 224 pp.
16. th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-34), IEEE Computer Society.
17. Kurtilla M, Pukkala T, 2003. Combining holding-level economic goals with spatial landscape-level goals in the planning of multiple ownership forestry. Landscape Ecology 18: 529-541.
18. Marques AF, Borges JG, Sousa P, Pinho AM, 2010a. An enterprise architecture approach to forest management support systems design. An application to pulpwood supply management in Portugal. European Journal of Forest Research 130(6): 935-948.
19. Marques AF, Borges JG, Sousa P, Fonseca M, García R, Batista G, 2010b. Applying enterprise architecture to the design of the integrated forest products supply chain management system (Varajão et al., eds). Proceedings of CENTERIS 2010, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. pp: 32-40.
20. Marques AF, Borges JG, Sousa P, Fonseca M, Gonçalves J, Oliveira J, 2012. Chapter 1: An enterprise architecture approach for designing an integrated wood supply management system. In: Organizational integration of enterprise systems and resources: advancements and applications (Varajão et al., eds). IGI Global.
21. Martins H, Borges JG, 2007. Addressing collaborative planning methods and tools in forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 248(1-2): 107-118.
22. Novais A, Canadas MJ, 2010. Understanding the management logic of private forest owners: a new approach. Forest Policy and Economics 12: 173-180.
23. Nieuwenhuis M, Tiernan D, 2005. The impact of the introduction of sustainable forest management objectives on the optimization of PC-based forest-level harvest schedules. Forest Policy and Economics 7(4): 689-701.
24. Nordstrom E-M, Romero C, Eriksson LO, Öhman K, 2009. Aggregation of preferences in participatory forest planning with multiple criteria: an application to the urban forest in Lycksele, Sweden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne de Recherche Forestiere 39: 1979-1992.
25. Palahí M, Pukkala T, 2003. Optimizing the management of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands in Spain based on individual-tree models. Annals of Forest Science 60: 105-114.
26. Papinet, 2011. Global standard for the paper and forest products. PapiNet ISS tool user guide v2r20. [internet site]. Available at www.papinet.org [Cited 20 Jun 2011].
27. PMI, 2011. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide). PMI Standards Committee, Project Management Institute. [Internet site]. Available at www.pmi.org [Cited 20 Jun 2011].
28. Pukkala T, Heinonen T, Kurttila M, 2009. An application of a reduced cost approach to spatial forest planning. Forest Science 55(1): 13-22.
29. Purnomo H, Mendonza G, Prabhu R, Yasmi Y, 2005. Developing multi-stakeholder forest management scenarios: a multi-agent system simulation approach applied in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics 7: 475-491.
30. Ribeiro RP, Borges JG, Pereira C, Sousa P, Lé J, 2005. Designing an integrated forest planning system for the forest industry: an application in Portugal. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Systems Analysis in Forest Resources, Stevenson, WA, USA.
31. Schmoldt D, Kangas J, Mendoza G, 2001. Basic principles of decision making in natural resources and the environment. In: The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making (Schmoldt D et al., eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp: 1-13.
32. Sheppard S, Meitner M, 2005. Using multi-criteria analysis and visualization for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. Forest Ecology and Management 207: 171-187.
33. Sousa P, Pereira C, 2005. Enterprise architecture: business and IT alignment. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing Archive, Santa Fe, New Mexico. Sousa P, Pereira C, Alves Marques J, 2005. Enterprise architecture alignment heuristics. Microsoft Enterprise Architectural Journal.
34. Spewak S, Hill S, 1992. Enterprise architecture planning: developing a blueprint for data, applications and technology. Wiley-QED Publication.
35. Tecle A, Shrestha B, Ducksteins L, 1998. A multiobjective decision support system for multiresource forest management. Group Decision and Negotiation 7: 23-40.
36. Toth SF, McDill ME, 2008. Promoting large, compact mature forest patches in harvest scheduling models. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 13(1): 1-15.
37. Vainio P, Tokola T, Palander T, Kangas A, 2009. A GIS-based stand management system for estimating local energy wood supplies. Biomass Bioenergy 33: 1278-1288.