Patient satisfaction with anesthesia: Beauty is in the eye of the consumer

Anesthesiology

Volumn 119, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 245-247

  Vetter, Thomas R ^a   Ivankova, Nataliya V ^b   Pittet, Jean Francois ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALIZATION; MEDICAL PROFESSION; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; REVIEW;

ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84880918111     PISSN: 00033022     EISSN: 15281175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318297605d     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Neuman MD: Patient satisfaction and value in anesthesia care. ANesthesiology 2011; 114:1019-20
2. Porter ME: What is value in health care? N engl J Med 2010; 363:2477-81
3. Heidegger T, Saal D, Nuebling M: Patient satisfaction with anaesthesia care: What is patient satisfaction, how should it be measured, and what is the evidence for assuring high patient satisfaction? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2006; 20:331-46 (Pubitemid 43811943)
4. Heidegger T, Nuebling M, Saal D, Kreienbühl G: Patient-centred outcomes in clinical research: Does it really matter? Br J Anaesth 2008; 100:1-3 (Pubitemid 351773428)
5. Hudak PL, Wright JG: the characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25:3167-77 (Pubitemid 32042949)
6. Shoemaker P: What value-based purchasing means to your hospital. healthc Financ Manage 2011; 65:60-8
7. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services (CMs), hhs: Medicare program; hospital inpatient value-based purchasing program. Final rule. Fed Regist 2011; 76:26490-547
8. Barnett SF, Alagar RK, Grocott MPW, Giammaris S, Dick JR, Moonesinghe SR: Patient satisfaction measures in anesthesia: Qualitative systematic review. ANesthesiology 2013; 119:452-78
9. Timmermans S, Oh H: the continued social transformation of the medical profession. J health soc Behav 2010; 51(supp l):s94-106
10. Berwick DM: What 'patient-centered' should mean: Confessions of an extremist. health Aff (Millwood) 2009; 28:w555-65
11. Wu AW, Snyder C, Clancy CM, Steinwachs DM: Adding the patient perspective to comparative effectiveness research. health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29:1863-71
12. Kon AA: the shared decision-making continuum. JAMA 2010; 304:903-4
13. Stange KC, Nutting PA, Miller WL, Jaén CR, Crabtree BF, Flocke SA, Gill JM: Defning and measuring the patient-centered medical home. J gen intern Med 2010; 25:601-12
14. ™. AsA Newsletter 2012; 76:30-2
15. Vetter TR, Goeddel LA, Boudreaux AM, Hunt TR, Jones KA, Pittet JF: the Perioperative surgical home: how can it make the case so everyone wins? BMC Anesthesiol 2013; 13:6
16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman Dg; PRisMA group: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRisMA statement. Ann intern Med 2009; 151:264-9, W64
17. Kravitz R: Patient satisfaction with health care: Critical outcome or trivial pursuit? J gen intern Med 1998; 13:280-2
18. Creswell JW, Tashakkori A: Differing perspectives on mixed methods research. J Mix Methods Res 2007; 1:303-8
19. Onwuegbuzie AJ, Bustamante RM, Nelson JA: Mixed research as a tool for developing quantitative instruments. J Mix Methods Res 2010; 4:56-78
20. Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Smith KC, For the offce of Behavioral and social sciences Research: Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the health sciences. Bethesda, National institutes of health, August 2011, pp 1-37
21. Stulberg JJ, Delaney CP, Neuhauser DV, Aron DC, Fu P, Koroukian SM: Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections. JAMA 2010; 303:2479-85