Update on tissue engineering in pediatric urology

Current Urology Reports

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 327-332

  Palmer, Blake W ^a   Kropp, Bradley P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bladder; Corporal bodies; Organ dysfunction; Pediatric urology; Tissue engineering; Urethra

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; POLYGLYCOLIC ACID; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; BLADDER FUNCTION; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHILD UROLOGY; CORPORA CAVERNOSA; HUMAN; MATERIAL STATE; NONHUMAN; PENIS; SMOOTH MUSCLE FIBER; THERAPY EFFECT; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE GROWTH; TISSUE REGENERATION; TISSUE TRANSPLANTATION; URETHRA; URETHRA STRICTURE;

CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PENIS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; URETHRA; URINARY BLADDER; UROGENITAL ABNORMALITIES; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84880910500     PISSN: 15272737     EISSN: 15346285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11934-013-0329-6     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bohne A, Osborn R, Hettle P. Regeneration of the urinary bladder in the dog, following total cystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1955;100:259-64.
2. Kurdish H. The use of polyvinyl sponge for experimental cystoplasty. J Urol. 1957;78:232.
3. Swinney J, Walden D. Urinary tract substitution. Br J Urol. 1961;33:414-27.
4. Agishi T, Nakazona M, Kiraly R, et al. Biodegradable material for bladder reconstruction. J Biomed Mater Res. 1975;9:119-31.
5. Scott R, Mohammed R, Garham S, et al. The evolution of a biodegradable membrane for use in urological surgery. A summary of 109 in vivo experiments. Br J Urol. 1988;62:26-31.
6. Matoka D, Cheng E. Tissue engineering in urology. Can Urol Assoc J. 2009;3(5):403-8.
7. Wolter JR, Meyer RF. Sessile macrophages forming clear endothelium-like membrane on the inside of successful keratoprosthesis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1985;222:109-17.
8. Fisher MB, Mauck RL. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: Recent Innovations and the Transition to Translation. Tissue Engineering: Part B. 2013;19(1):1-13.
9. Roth C, Kropp B. Recent advances in urologic tissue engineering. Current Urology Reports. 2009;10:119-25.
10. Olson JL, Atala A, Yoo J. Tissue engineering: current strategies and future directions. Chonnam Med J. 2011;47:1-13.
11. Hollander A. Cell therapies and regenerative medicine - the dawn of a new age or more hype than hope? Clinical and Translational Medicine. 2012;1:12.
12. Oerlemans A, Feitz W, Van Leeuwen E, Dekkers W. Regenerative Urology Clinical Trials: An Ethical Assessment of Road Blocks and Solutions. Tissue Engineering: Part B. 2013;19(1):41-7.
13. Wiesmann HP, Meyer U. Biomaterials. In Meyer U, Meyer T, Handschel J, Weismann HP eds. Fundamentals of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Chapt 34. 457-68: Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
14. • Wezel F, Southgate J, Thomas D. Regernative medicine in urology. BJU Int. 2011;108:1046-65. This review illustrates the basic science processes in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering and outlines the need and process for use of these technologies in urology.
15. •• Kropp B, Cheng E, Pope IV J, Brock III J, Koyle M, Furness P, et al. Use of small intestinal submucosa for corporal body grafting in cases of severe penile curvature. J Urology. 2002;168:1742-5. This multi-institution trial established the use of tissue engineering as a substitute for the previous gold standard approach for corporal body grafting using an 'off the shelf' biomaterial that has become widely utilized.
16. Soergel T, Cain M, Kaefer M, Gitlin J, Casale A, Davis M, et al. Complications of small intestinal submucosa for corporal body grafting for proximal hypospadias. J Urology. 2003;170:1577-9.
17. Weiser A, Franco I, Herz D, Silver R, Reda E. Single layered small intestinal submucosa in the repair of severe chordee and complicated hypospadias. J Urology. 2003;170:1593-5.
18. Elmore J, Kirsch A, Scherz H, Smith E. Small intestinal submucosa for corporeal body grafting in severe hypospadias requiring division of the urethral plate. J Urology. 2007;178:1698-701.
19. Leslie J, Cain M, Kaefer M, Meldrum K, Misseri R, Rink R. Corporeal grafting for severe hypospadias: a single institution experience with 3 techniques. J Urology. 2008;180:1749-52.
20. Hayn M, Bellinger M, Schneck F. Small intestine submucosa as a corporal body graft in the repair of severe chordee. Urology. 2009;73:277-9.
21. Castellan M, Gosalbez R, Devendra J, Bar-Yusel Y, Labbie A. J Ventral corporal body grafting for correcting severe penile curvature associated with single or two-stage hypospadias repair. Pediatric Urology. 2011;7:289-93.
22. Kropp BP, Ludlow JK, Spicer D, et al. Rabbit urethral regeneration using small intestinal submucosa onlay grafts. Urology. 1998;52:138-42.
23. Chen F, Yoo J, Atala A. Acellular collagen matrix as a possible "off the shelf" biomaterial for urethral repair. Urology. 1999;54:407-10.
24. Olsen L, Bowald S, Busch C, et al. Urethral reconstruction with a new synthetic absorbable device. An experimental study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1992;26:323-6.
25. Sievert KD, Bakircioglu ME, Nunes L, et al. Homologous acellular matrix graft for urethral reconstruction in the rabbit: histological and functional evaluation. J Urol. 2000;163:1958-65.
26. Dorin R, Phol H, De Filippo R, Yoo J, Atala A. Tubularized urethral replacement with unseeded matrices: what is the maximum distance for normal tissue regeneration? World J Urol. 2008;26:323-6.
27. De Filippo R, Yoo J, Atala A. Urehtral replacement using cell seeded tubularized collagen matrices. J Urology. 2002;168:1789-92.
28. Fu Q, Deng CL, Liu W, Cao YL. Urethral replacement using epidermal cell-seeded tubular acellular bladder collagen matrix. BJU. 2007;99:1162-5.
29. Orabi H, AbouShwareb, Zhang Y, Yoo J, Atala A. Cell-seeded tubularized scaffolds for reconstruction of long urethral defects: a preclinical study. Eur Urol. 2013;63:531-8.
30. Atala A, Guzman L, Retik A. A novel inert collagen matrix for hypospadias repair. J Urology. 1999;162:1148-51.
31. El-Kassaby AW, Retik AB, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Urethral stricture repair with an off-the-shelf collagen matrix. J Urology. 2003;169:170-3.
32. El-Kassaby AW, AbouShwareb T, Atala A. Randomized comparative study between buccal mucosal and acellular bladder matrix grafts in complex anterior urethral strictures. J Urology. 2008;179:1432-6.
33. Hauser S, Bastian P, Fechner G, Muller S. Small intestine submucosa in urethral stricture repair in a consecutive series. Urology. 2006;68:263-6.
34. Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Colombo F, Austoni E. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) graft urethroplasty: short term results. Eur Urol. 2007;51:1695-701.
35. Fiala R, Vidlar A, Vrtal R, Belej K, Student V. Porcine small intestinal submucosa graft for repair of anterior urethral stricture. Eur Urol. 2007;51:1702-8.
36. Atala A. (2011). Regenerative medicine in urology: stem cells, tissue engineering and cloning. In Kavoussi L, Novick A, Partin A, Peters C. Editors (10th Eds.), Campbell-Walsh Urology (Chap 19) Philadelphia: Elsevier-Saunders.
37. Bhargava S, Patterson J, Inman D, MacNeil S, Chapple C. Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa urethroplasty-clinical outcomes. Eur Urol. 2008;53:1263-71.
38. Fossum M, Svensson J, Kratz G, Nordenskjold A. Autologous in vitro cultured urothelium in hypospadias repair. J Pediatric Urology. 2007;3:10-8.
39. Fossum M, Skikuniene J, Orrego A, Nordenskold A. Prepubertal follow-up after hypospadias repair with autologous in vitro cultured urothelial cells. Acta Pediatrica. 2012;101:755-60.
40. Le Roux P. Endoscopic urethroplasty with unseeded small intestinal submucosa collagen matrix graft: a pilot study. J Urol. 2005;173:140-3.
41. •• Raya-Rivera A, Esquiliano D, Yoo J, Lopez-Bayghen E, Soker S, Atala A. Tissue-engineered autologous urethras for patients who need reconstruction: an observational study. Lancet. 2011;377:1175-82. This investigative clinical trial shows the ability to use bladder smooth muscle and urothelium cells co-seeded on a tubularized biomaterial scaffold for urethral replacement of long defects in children.
42. Kropp BP, Cheng EY. Bladder augmentation: current and future techniques. In: Docimo SG, Canning DA, Khoury AE, editors. Clinical Pediatric Urology. London: Informa; 2007. p. 871-910.
43. Schaefer BM, Lorenz C, Back W, Moll R, Sun TT, Schober C, et al. Autologous transplantation of urothelium into demucosalized gastrointestinal segments: evidence for epithelialization and differentiation of in vitro expanded and transplanted urothelial cells. J Urol. 1998;159:284-90.
44. Turner A, Subramanian R, Thomas DF, et al. Transplantation of autologous differentiated urothelium in an experimental model of composite cystoplasty. Eur Urol. 2011;59:447-54.
45. Fraser M, Thomas DF, Pitt E, Harnden P, Trejdosiewicz LK, Southgate J. A surgical model of composite cystoplasty with cultured urothelial cells: a controlled study of gross outcome and urothelial phenotype. BJU Int. 2004;93:609-16.
46. Kropp BP, Sawyer BD, Shannon HE, et al. Characterization of small intestinal submucosa regenerated canine detrusor: assessment of reinnervation, in vitro compliance and contractility. J Urol. 1996;156:599-607.
47. Dahms S, Piechota HJ, Dahiya R, Lue TF, Tanagho EA. Composition and biomechanical properties of the bladder acellular matrix graft: comparative analysis in rat, pig and human. BJU. 1998;82:411-9.
48. Chen BS, Zhang S, Geng H, Pan J, Chen F. Ex vivo functional evaluation of isolated strips of BAMG tissue engineered bladders. Int J Artif Organs. 2009;32:159-65.
49. Zhang Y, Frimberger D, Cheng EY, Lin HK, Kropp BP. Challenges in a larger bladder replacement with cell-seeded and unseeded small intestinal submucosa grafts in a subtotal cystectomy model. BJU Int. 2006;98:1100-5.
50. Jack GS, Zhang R, Lee M, Xu Y, Wu BM, Rodriguez LV. Urinary bladder smooth muscle engineered from adipose stem cells and a three dimensional synthetic composite. Biomaterials. 2009;30:3259-70.
51. Gilbert TW, Sellaro TL, Badylak SF. Decellularization of tissues and organs. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3675-83.
52. Kimuli M, Eardley I, Southgate J. In vitro assessment of decellularized porcine dermis as a matrix for urinary tract reconstruction. BJU Int. 2004;94:859-66.
53. Oberpenning F, Meng J, Yoo JJ, Atala A. De novo reconstitution of a functional mammalian urinary bladder by tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:149-55.
54. Jayo MJ, Jain D, Ludlow JW, et al. Long-term durability, tissue regeneration and neo-organ growth during skeletal maturation with a neo-bladder augmentation construct. Regen Med. 2008;3:671-82.
55. Tanaka ST, Thangappan R, Eandi JA, Leung KN, Kurzrock EA. Bladder wall transplantation - long-term survival of cells: implications for bioengineering and clinical application. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16:2121-7.
56. Yoo JJ, Meng J, Oberpenning F, Atala A. Bladder augmentation using allogenic bladder subucosa seeded with cells. Urology. 1998;51:221-5.
57. • Atala A, Bauer S, Soker S, Yoo J, Retik A. Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty. Lancet. 2006;367:1241-6. The first clinical application of tissue engineered bladder augmentation model with limited success but illustrates the potential applications.
58. Lin HK, Cowan R, Moore P, et al. Characterization of neuropathic bladder smooth muscle cells in culture. J Urol. 2004;171:1348-52.
59. Subramaniam R, Hinley J, Stahlschmidt J, Southgate J. Tissue engineering potential of urothelial cells from diseased bladders. J Urol. 2011;186:2014-20.
60. • Sharma A, Bury M, Fuller N, Marks A, Kollhoff D, Rao M, et al. Cotransplantation with specific populations of spina bifida bone marrow stem/progenitor cells enhances urinary bladder regeneration. PNAS. 2013;110:2003-8. New work showing potential for autologous bone marrow stem/progenitor cells use as an alternative to autologous native bladder cells in neuropathic bladder patients.