Reasoning about categories in conceptual spaces

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 385-392

  Gärdenfors, Peter ^a   Williams, Mary Anne ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY COGNITIVE SCIENCE   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL SPACES; CONTEXT-SENSITIVE; GEOMETRIC ALGORITHM; GEOMETRICAL REPRESENTATION; REGION CONNECTION CALCULUS; RESEARCH GOALS;

ALGORITHMS; CALCULATIONS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84880882888     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Aurenhammer, F., Power Diagrams: Properties, Algorithms and Applications, SIAM Journal of Computing Surveys, 16(1):78-96, 1987. (Pubitemid 17526776)
2. Aurenhammer, F., Voronoi Diagrams: A Survey of a Fundamental Data Structure, ACM Computing Surveys, 23(3), 345-405, 1991.
3. Balkenius, C., Are There Dimensions in the Brain? in Spinning Ideas, Electronic Essays Dedicated to Peter Gärdenfors on His Fiftieth Birthday online at http://www.lucs.lu.se/spinning.
4. Borsuk, K., and Szmielew, W, Foundations of Geometry. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1960.
5. Bennett, B., Logical Representations for Automated Reasoning about Spatial Relationships, PhD Thesis, University of Leeds, 1997.
6. Chella, A., Frixione, M., and Gaglio, S. An architecture for autonomous agents exploiting conceptual representations, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 25(3-4):231-240, 1998. (Pubitemid 128401278)
7. Cohn, A. G., Bennett, B., Gooday, J. and Gotts. N.M., Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning with the Region Connection Calculus, Geoinformatica, 1(3), 1-42, 1997.
8. Cohn, A. G. and Gotts. N.M., Representing Spatial Vagueness: A Mereological Approach, in Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 230-241, 1996.
9. Dwyer, R.A., Higher-Dimensional Voronoi Diagrams in Linear Expected Time, in Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, 326-333, 1987.
10. Gärdenfors, P., Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought, A Bradford Book, MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 2000.
11. Harnad, S., Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition, Cambridge University Press.
12. Hampton, J., Prototype Models of Concept Representation, Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis, Academic Press, London, 67-95, 1993.
13. Krusal, J.B., and Wish, M, Multi-dimensional Scaling. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1978.
14. Klee, V., On the complexity of d-dimensional Voronoi diagrams, Archiv de Mathematik, 34: 74-80, 1980.
15. May, B. Moody, D.B., Stebbins, W.C., Categorical perception of conspecific communication sounds by Japanese macaques, Macaca fuscata, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 85, No. 2, Pages 837-847, 1989. (Pubitemid 19050589)
16. Nebel, B., Computational Properties of Qualitative Spatial Reasoning, in Wachsmuth, Rollinger and Brauer (eds), Proceedings of the 19th German AI Conference, Vol 981 LNCS, 233-244, Springer-Verlag, 1995.
17. Okabe, A., Boots, B., Sugihara, K., and Chiu, S.N., Spatial Tessellations, 2nd Ed, Wiley, 2000.
18. Petitot, J., Morphodynamics and the Categorical Perception of Phonological Units, Theoretical Linguistics, 15: 25-71, 1989.
19. Renz, J. and Nebel, B., On the Complexity of Qualitative Spatial Reasoning: A Maximal Tractable Fragment of the Region Connection Calculus, Artificial Intelligence, 108 (1-2): 69-123, 1999.
20. Rosch, E., Cognitive representations of semantic categories, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104: 192-232, 1975.