Optimal design of expendable launch vehicles using stage-wise MDO formulation

13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Balesdent, Mathieu ^a   Bérendy, Nicolas ^b   Dépincé, Philippe ^c  

^a CNES   (France)

^b ONERA   (France)

^c INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE EN COMMUNICATIONS ET CYBERNÉTIQUE DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSICAL METHODS; COMPLEX PROCESSES; DIFFERENT STAGES; EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLES; GLOBAL OPTIMIZER; LAUNCH VEHICLE DESIGN; MULTI DISCIPLINES; MULTISTAGE LAUNCH VEHICLES;

DECOMPOSITION; LAUNCH VEHICLES; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84880841629     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-9324     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Agte J., de Weck O., Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J., Arendsen P., Morris A., Spieck M. MDO: assessment and direction for advancement-an opinion of one international group, In: Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 40, pp17-33, 2009
2. rd International Conference on Multidisciplinary Design Optimization and applications. Paris, France, June 2010
3. rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. Cincinnati, OH, USA, July 2007, AIAA-2007-5852
4. Braun R., Kroo I. and Gage P. Post-Optimality Analysis In Aerospace Vehicle Design. In: AIAA Aircraft Design, Systems and Operations Meeting. Monterey, CA, USA, August 1993, AIAA 93-3932
5. Braun R. and Kroo I. Development and application of the Collaborative Optimization architecture in a multidisciplinary design environment, In: Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State of the Art, SIAM, 1996: 98-116.
6. Brown N., Olds R. J. Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Optimization Techniques Applied to a Reusable Launch Vehicle. In: Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1289-1300, 2006
7. th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Albany, New-York, USA, August 2004, AIAA-2004-4441
8. Humble R. W., Henry G. N. and Larson W. J. Space propulsion analysis and design. The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., 748p, 1995
9. Ledsinger L. A. and Olds J. R. Optimized Solutions for Kistler K-1 Branching Trajectories Using Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Techniques, In: Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2002, pp. 420-429
10. th International Conference on Launcher Technology, Space Launchers: Missions, Control and Avionics. Madrid, Spain, November 2003
11. th Congress of International Astronautical Federation. Jerusalem, Israel, October 1994, IAF-94-A. 02. 018
12. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J., Agte J. and Sandusky R. Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis. In: AIAA Journal, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 164-172, 2000.
13. Tsuchiya T. and Mori T. Optimal Conceptual Design of Two-Stage Reusable Rocket Vehicles Including Trajectory Optimization, In: Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2004, pp. 770-778.