Chromatin Accessibility Data Sets Show Bias Due to Sequence Specificity of the DNase I Enzyme

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2013, Pages

  Koohy, Hashem ^a   Down, Thomas A ^a,b   Hubbard, Tim J ^a  

^a WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; ENZYME ASSAY; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN MOTIF; SCORING SYSTEM; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; VALIDATION PROCESS;

BASE SEQUENCE; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CELL LINE; CHROMATIN; DATABASES, NUCLEIC ACID; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I; HUMANS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEOTIDE MOTIFS; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84880838145     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069853     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Samejima K, Earnshaw WC, (2005) Trashing the genome: the role of nucleases during apoptosis. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 6: 677-688.
2. Neph S, Vierstra J, Stergachis AB, Reynolds AP, Haugen E, et al. (2012) An expansive human regulatory lexicon encoded in transcription factor footprints. Nature 489: 83-90.
3. Wu C, (1980) The 5′ ends of Droshophila heat shock genes in chromatin are hypersensitive to DNase I. Nature. 286: 854-860.
4. Crawford GE, Davis S, Scacheri PC, Renaud G, Halawi MJ, et al. (2006) DNase-chip: a high-resolution method to identify DNase I hypersensitive sites using tiled microarrays. Nature Methods 3: 503-509.
5. Sabo PJ, Kuehn MS, Thurman R, Johnson BE, Johnson EM, et al. (2006) Genome-scale mapping of DNase I sensitivity in vivo using tiling DNA microarrays. Nature Methods 3: 511-518.
6. Consortium TEP, (2012) An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 488: 57-74.
7. Natarajan A, Yardimci GG, Shefield NC, Crawford GE, Ohler U, (2012) Predicting cell-type-specific gene expression from regions of open chromatin. Genome research 22: 1711-1722.
8. John S, Sabo PJ, Thurman RE, Sung MH, Biddie SC, et al. (2011) Chromatin accessibility pre-determines glucocorticoid receptor binding patterns. Nature genetics 243: 264-268.
9. Sekimata M, Pérez-Melgosa M, Miller SA, Weinmann AS, Sabo PJ, et al. (2009) CCCTC-Binding factor and the transcription factor T-bet orchestrate T Helper 1 cell-specific structure and function at the interferon-locus. Immunity 31: 551-564.
10. Boyle AP, Davis S, Shulha HP, Meltzer P, Margulies EH, et al. (2008) High-resolution mapping and characterization of open chromatin across the genome. Cell 132: 311-322.
11. Sabo PJ, Hawrylycz M, Wallace JC, Humbert R, Yu M, et al. (2004) Discovery of functional noncoding elements by digital analysis of chromatin structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 16837-16842.
12. Boyle AP, Guinney J, Crawford GE, Furey TS, (2008) F-Seq: a feature density estimator for high-throughput sequence tags. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 24: 2537-2538.
13. Schwartz S, Oren R, Ast G, (2011) Detection and removal of biases in the analysis of next-generation sequencing reads. PloS One 6: e16685.
14. Cheung MS, Down TA, Latorre I, Ahringer J, (2011) Systematic bias in high-throughput sequencing data and its correction by BEADS. Nucleic Acids Research 39: e103.
15. Vijaya Satya R, Zavaljevski N, Reifman J, (2012) A new strategy to reduce allelic bias in RNA-Seq readmapping. Nucleic Acids Research 40: e127.
16. Thurman RE, Rynes E, Humbert R, Vierstra J, Maurano MT, et al. (2012) The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature 489: 75-82.
17. Song L, Crawford GE, (2010) DNase-seq: A High-resolution technique for mapping active gene regulatory elements across the genome from mammalian Cells. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2010: 1-11.
18. He HH, Meyer CA, Chen MW, Jordan VC, Brown M, et al. (2012) Differential DNase I hypersensitivity reveals factor-dependent chromatin dynamics. Genome research 22: 1015-1025.
19. Tewari AK, Yardimci GG, Shibata Y, Shefield NC, Song L, et al. (2012) Chromatin accessibility reveals insights into androgen receptor activation and transcriptional specificity. Genome Biology 13: R88.
20. Song L, Zhang Z, Grasfeder LL, Boyle AP, Giresi PG, et al. (2011) Open chromatin defined by DNaseI and FAIRE identifies regulatory elements that shape cell-type identity. Genome research 21: 1757-1767.
21. Heddi B, Abi-Ghanem J, Lavigne M, Hartmann B, (2010) Sequence-dependent DNA exibility mediates dNase I cleavage. Journal of molecular biology 395: 123-133.
22. Brukner I, Jurukovski V, Savic A, (1990) Sequence-dependent structural variations of DNA revealed by DNase I. Nucleic Acids Research. 18: 891-894.
23. Brukner I, Sánchez R, Suck D, Pongor S, (1995) Sequence-dependent bending propensity of DNA as revealed by DNase I: parameters for trinucleotides. The EMBO Journal 14: 1812-1818.
24. Lahm A, Suck D, (1991) DNase I-induced DNA conformation. 2 A structure of a DNase I-octamer complex. Journal of molecular biology 222: 645-667.
25. Suck D, Lahm A, Oefner C, (1988) Structure refined to 2A of a nicked DNA octanucleotide complex with DNase I. Nature. 332: 464-468.
26. Bernstein BE, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Costello JF, Ren B, Milosavljevic A, et al. (2010) The NIH roadmap epigenomics mapping consortium. Nature biotechnology 28: 1045-1048.
27. Chadwick LH, (2012) The NIH roadmap epigenomics program data resource. Epigenomics 4: 317-324.