Current approaches using genetic distances produce poor estimates of landscape resistance to interindividual dispersal

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 22, Issue 15, 2013, Pages 3888-3903

  Graves, Tabitha A ^a   Beier, Paul ^b   Royle, J Andrew ^c  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PATUXENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

causal modelling; connectivity; dispersal landscape genetics; Mantel test; resistance

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISPERSAL; ARTICLE; CAUSAL MODELLING; CONNECTIVITY; DISPERSAL LANDSCAPE GENETICS; ECOSYSTEM; GENE FLOW; GENETIC DRIFT; MANTEL TEST; PLANT DISPERSAL; RESISTANCE;

CAUSAL MODELLING; CONNECTIVITY; DISPERSAL LANDSCAPE GENETICS; MANTEL TEST; RESISTANCE;

ANIMAL DISTRIBUTION; ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; GENE FLOW; GENETIC DRIFT; PLANT DISPERSAL;

EID: 84880825461     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/mec.12348     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, et al,. (2003) The application of 'least-cost' modeling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and urban planning, 64, 233-247.
2. Balkenhol N, Gugerli F, Cushman SA, et al,. (2009a) Identifying future research needs in landscape genetics: where to from here? Landscape Ecology, 24, 455-463.
3. Balkenhol N, Waits LP, Dezanni RJ, (2009b) Statistical approaches in landscape genetics: an evaluation of methods for linking landscape and genetic data. Ecography, 32, 818-830.
4. Balloux F, Amos W, Coulson T, (2004) Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations? Molecular Ecology, 13, 3021-3031.
5. Beier P, Majka DR, Spencer WD, (2008) Forks in the road: choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages. Conservation Biology, 22, 836-851.
6. Beier P, Majka DR, Newell SL., (2009) Uncertainty analysis of a least-cost modeling approach to wildlife corridor design. Ecological Applications, 19, 2067-2077.
7. Biek R, Akamine N, Schwartz MK, Ruth TK, Murphy KM, Poss M, (2006) Genetic consequences of sex-biased dispersal in a solitary carnivore: Yellowstone cougars. Biology Letters, 2, 312-315.
8. Bowcock AM, Ruiz-Linares A, Tomfohrde J, et al,. (1994) High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature, 368, 455-457.
9. Cushman SA, Landguth EL., (2010) Spurious correlations and inference in landscape genetics. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3592-3602.
10. Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK., (2006) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. The American Naturalist, 168, 486-489.
11. Cushman SA, Shirk A, Landguth EL, (2012) Separating the effects of habitat area, fragmentation and matrix resistance on genetic differentiation in complex landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 27, 369-380.
12. Dennis JE, Schnabel RB., (1983) Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
13. Drake JW, Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D, Crow JF., (1998) Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics, 148, 1667-1686.
14. Epperson BK, (2007) Plant dispersal, neighbourhood size, and isolation by distance. Molecular Ecology, 16, 3854-3865.
15. Epps CW, Palsboll PJ, Wehausen JD, Roderick GK, Ramey II RR, McCullough DR., (2005) Highways block gene flow and cause a rapid decline in genetic diversity of desert bighorn sheep. Ecology Letters, 8, 1029-1038.
16. Epps, CW, Wehausen JD, Bleich VC, Torres SG, Brashares JS., (2007) Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 714-724.
17. Fortin D, Beyer HL, Boyce MS, Smith DW, Duchesne T, Mao JS, (2005) Wolves influence elk movements: behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology, 86, 1320-1330.
18. Galpern P, Manseau M, Wilson P, (2012) Grains of connectivity: analysis at multiple spatial scales in landscape genetics. Molecular Ecology, 21, 3996-4009.
19. Gardner RH, (1999) QRULE: a program for the generation of random maps and the analysis of spatial patterns. In: Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications (eds, Klopatek JM, Gardner RH,), pp. 280-303. Springer-Verlag, New York.
20. Gerlach G, Musolf K., (2000) Fragmentation of landscape as a cause for genetic subdivision in bank voles. Conservation Biology, 14, 1066-1074.
21. Goslee SC, Urban DL, (2012) The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analyses of ecological data. Journal of Statistical Software, 22, 1-19.
22. Graves TA,. (2012) Dissertation: Spatial ecology of grizzly bears in northwestern Montana and estimating resistance to gene flow. Northern Arizona University. ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing 3509852.
23. Graves TA, Wasserman TN, Cezar Ribeiro M, et al,. (2012) The influence of landscape characteristics and home-range size on the quantification of landscape-genetics relationships. Landscape Ecology, 27, 253-266.
24. Graves TA, Beier P, Royle JA, (2013) Data from: Current approaches using genetic distances produce poor estimates of landscape resistance to inter-individual dispersal. Dryad Digital Repository. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/ dryad.b8842
25. Hanks EM, Hooten MB, (2013) Circuit theory and model-based inference for landscape connectivity. Journal of the American Statistical Association 108, 22-33.
26. Holderegger R, Wagner HH., (2008) Landscape genetics. BioScience, 58, 199-207.
27. Hubert LJ, Golledge RG., (1981) A heuristic method for the comparison of related structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 23, 214-226.
28. Jaquiéry J, Broquet T, Hirzel AH, Yearsley J, Perrin N., (2011) Inferring landscape effects on dispersal from genetic distances: how far can we go? Molecular Ecology, 20, 692-705.
29. Kormann U, Gugerli F, Ray N, Excoffier L, Bollmann, K, (2012) Parsimony-based pedigree analysis and individual-based landscape genetics suggest topography to restrict dispersal and connectivity in the endangered capercaillie. Biological Conservation, 152, 241-252.
30. Landguth EL, Cushman SA., (2009) CDPOP: an individual-based, cost-distance spatial population genetics model. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 156-161.
31. Landguth EL, Cushman SA, Murphy MA, Luikart G, (2010a) Relationships between migration rates and landscape resistance assessed using individual-based simulations. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 854-862.
32. Landguth EL, Cushman SA, Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS, Murphy M, Luikart G., (2010b) Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics. Molecular Ecology, 19, 4179-4191.
33. Legendre P., (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology, 74, 1659-1673.
34. Legendre P, Fortin MJ., (2010) Comparison of the Mantel test and alternative approaches for detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 831-844.
35. Legendre P, Legendre L, (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd English edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
36. Legendre P, Trousselier M., (1988) Aquatic heterotrophic bacteria: modeling in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Limnology and Oceanography, 33, 1055-1067.
37. Li Y-C, Korol AB, Fahima T, Beiles A, Nevo E., (2002) Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2453-2465.
38. Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P., (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 189-197.
39. Mantel N., (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research, 27, 209-220.
40. McCullagh P., (2009) Marginal likelihood for distance matrices. Statistica Sinica, 19, 631-649.
41. McRae BH., (2006) Isolation by resistance. Evolution, 60, 1551-1561.
42. McRae BH, Beier P., (2007) Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 19885-19890.
43. Nelder JA, Mead R., (1965) A simplex algorithm for function minimization. Computer Journal, 7, 308-313.
44. Perez-Espona S, Perez-Barberia FJ, Mcleod JE, Jiggins CD, Gordon IJ, Pemberton JM., (2008) Landscape features affect gene flow of Scottish Highland red deer (Cervus elaphus). Molecular Ecology, 17, 981-996.
45. Proctor MF, McLellan BN, Strobeck C, Barclay RMR, (2005) Genetic analysis reveals demographic fragmentation of grizzly bears yielding vulnerability by small populations. Proceedings Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 272, 2409-2416.
46. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.
47. Rayfield B, Fortin M-J, Fall A, (2010) The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values. Landscape Ecology 25: 519-532.
48. Rousset F., (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics, 145, 1219-1228.
49. Rousset F., (2000) Genetic differentiation between individuals. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 13, 58-62.
50. Royle JA, Chandler RB, Gazenski KD, Graves TA, (2013) Ecological distance in spatial capture-recapture models. Ecology 94, 287-294.
51. Schnabel RB, Koontz JE, Weiss BE., (1985) A modular system of algorithms for unconstrained minimization. Association for Computing Machinery, Transactions on Mathematical Software, 11, 419-440.
52. Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS, (2009) Why sampling scheme matters: the effect of sampling scheme on landscape genetic results. Conservation Genetics, 10, 441-452.
53. Schwartz MK, Copeland JP, Anderson NJ, et al,. (2009) Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche. Ecology, 90, 3222-3232.
54. Serrouya RD, Paetkau D, McLellan BN, Boutin S, Campbell M, Jenkins DA., (2012) Populations size and major valleys explain microsatellite variation better than taxonomic units for caribou in western Canada. Molecular Ecology, 21, 2588-2601.
55. Seyfert AL, Cristescu MA, Frisse L, Schaack S, Thomas WK, Lynch M, (2008) The rate and spectrum of microsatellite mutation in Caenorhabditis elegans and Daphnia pulex. Genetics 178, 2113-2121.
56. Shirk AJ, Wallin DO, Cushman SA, Rice CG, Wahrheit KI, (2010) Inferring landscape effects on gene flow: a new model selection framework. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3603-3619.
57. Shortbull RA, Cushman SA, Mace R, et al,. (2011) Why replication is important in landscape genetics: American black bear in the Rocky Mountains. Molecular Ecology, 20, 1092-1107.
58. Smouse PE, Peakall R., (1999) Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity, 82, 561-573.
59. Smouse PE, Long JC, Sokal RR, (1986) Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Systematic Zoology, 35, 627-632.
60. Spear SF, Balkenhol N, Fortin M-J, McRae BH, Scribner K, (2010) Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3576-3591.
61. Van Etten J, (2011) Package gdistance. R package version 1.1-2.
62. Van Etten J, Hijmans RJ, (2010) A geospatial modeling approach integrating archaeobotany and genetics to trace the dispersal of domesticated plants. PLoS ONE, 5, e12060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012060
63. Wang IJ, Savage WK, Shaffer HB., (2009) Landscape genetics and least-cost path analysis reveal unexpected dispersal routes in the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense). Molecular Ecology, 18, 1365-1374.
64. Wasserman TN, Cushman SA, Schwartz MK, Wallin DO, (2010) Spatial scaling and multi-model inference in landscape genetics: Martes Americana in northern Idaho. Landscape Ecology, 25, 1601-1612.
65. Wright S., (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics, 28, 114-138.
66. Wright S., (1946) Isolation by distance under diverse systems of mating. Genetics, 31, 39-59.