Glocal Clinical Registries: Pacemaker Registry Design and Implementation for Global and Local Integration - Methodology and Case Study

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2013, Pages

  da Silva, Kátia Regina ^a,b   Costa, Roberto ^a   Crevelari, Elizabeth Sartori ^a   Lacerda, Marianna Sobral ^a   de Moraes Albertini, Caio Marcos ^a   Filho, Martino Martinelli ^a   Santana, José Eduardo ^c   Vissoci, João Ricardo Nickenig ^b,d,e   Pietrobon, Ricardo ^b   Barros, Jacson V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF ALAGOAS   (Brazil)

^d PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^e Curso de Medicina   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRADYCARDIA; CASE STUDY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE SAFETY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; IMPLANT REGISTRY; IMPLANTED HEART PACEMAKER; LENGTH OF STAY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY; VENTRICULAR PACEMAKER;

BRAZIL; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DATA COLLECTION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REGISTRIES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84880816375     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071090     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Prokosch HU, Ganslandt T, (2009) Perspectives for medical informatics. Reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research. Methods of Information in Medicine 48: 38-44.
2. Lopez MH, Holve E, Sarkar IN, Segal C (2012) Building the informatics infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research (CER): a review of the literature. Med Care 50Suppl: S38-48.
3. Haux R, (2006) Individualization, globalization and health - about sustainable information technologies and the aim of medical informatics. Int J Med Inform. 75(12): 795-808.
4. Dreyer NA, Garner S, (2009) Registries for Robust Evidence. JAMA 302 (7): 790-791.
5. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, editors (2010) Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide. 2nd edition. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK49444/. Accessed 2013 Jul 3.
6. Chan KS, Fowles JB, Weiner JP, (2010) Electronic Health Records and Reliability and Validity of Quality Measures: A Review of the Literature. Med Care Res Rev. 67(5): 503-527.
7. Lyratzopoulos G, Patrick H, Campbell B, (2008) Registers needed for new interventional procedures. Lancet 371(9626): 1734-1736.
8. Paxton EW, Inacio MC, Kiley ML, (2012) The Kaiser Permanent implant registries: effect on patient safety, quality improvement, cost effectiveness, and research opportunities. Perm J. 16(2): 36-44.
9. Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Post-Approval Studies. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. Available: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/PostmarketRequirements/PostApprovaStudies/default.htm. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
10. Maisel WH, (2006) Pacemaker and ICD generator reliability: meta-analysis of device registries. JAMA 295(16): 1929-1934.
11. Tracy CM, Epstein AE, Darbar D, Dimarco JP, Dunbar SB, et al. (2012) ACC/AHA/HRS Focused Update of the 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 126(14): 1784-1800.
12. Poole JE, Gleva MJ, Mela T, Chung MK, Uslan DZ, et al. (2010) Complication rates associated with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacements and upgrade procedures: results from the REPLACE registry. Circulation 122(16): 1553-1561.
13. Uslan DZ, Gleva MJ, Warren DK, Mela T, Chung MK, et al. (2012) Cardiovascular implantable electronic device replacement infections and prevention: results from the REPLACE Registry. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 35(1): 81-87.
14. Jacobs JP, Edwards FH, Shahian DM, Haan CK, Puskas JD, et al. (2010) Successful linking of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare data. Ann Thorac Surg 90(4): 1150-1156.
15. Arts DG, De Keizer NF, Scheffer GJ, (2002) Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic framework. J Am Med Inform Assoc 9(6): 600-611.
16. Sedrakyan A, Marinac-Dabic D, Normand S-LT, Mushlin A, Gross T (2010) A framework for evidence evaluation and methodological issues in implantable device studies. Med Care 48(6 Suppl): S121-S128.
17. Bradley CJ, Penberthy L, Devers KJ, Holden DJ, (2010) Health services research and data linkages: issues, methods, and directions for the future. Health Serv Res 45(5 Pt 2): 1468-1488.
18. Richesson RL, Krischer J, (2007) Data standards in clinical research: gaps, overlaps, challenges and future directions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14(6): 687-696.
19. Hammond WE, (2008) eHealth interoperability. Stud Health Technol Inform 134: 245-253.
20. McCourt B, Harrington RA, Fox K, Hamilton CD, Booher K, et al. (2007) Data standards: at the intersection of sites, clinical research networks, and standards development initiatives. Drug Inform J 41: 393-404.
21. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, et al. (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support, J Biomed Inform. 42(2): 377-381.
22. Shah J, Rajgor D, Pradhan S, McCready M, Zaveri A, et al. (2010) Electronic data capture for registries and clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery: open source versus commercial systems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(10): 2664-2671.
23. De Carvalho ECA, Jayanti MK, Batilana AP, Kozan AM, Rodrigues MJ, et al. (2010) Standardizing clinical trials workflow representation in UML for international site comparison. PLoS One 5(11): e13893.
24. De Carvalho ECA, Batilana AP, Claudino W, Reis LF, Schmerling RA, et al. (2012) Workflow in clinical trial sites & its association with near miss events for data quality: ethnographic, workflow & systems simulation. PLoS One 7(6): e39671.
25. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Available: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/index.html Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
26. Stodden V (2009) Enabling Reproducible Research: Open Licensing for Scientific Innovation. International Journal of Communications Law and Policy, Forthcoming. Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1362040 Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
27. Radford MJ, Heidenreich PA, Bailey SR, Goff DC, Grover FL, et al. (2007) ACC/AHA 2007 methodology for the development of clinical data standards: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards. Circulation 115: 936-943.
28. Weintraub WS, Karlsberg RP, Tcheng JE, Boris JR, Buxton AE, et al. (2011) ACC/AHA 2011 key data elements and definitions of a base cardiovascular vocabulary for electronic health records: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(2): 202-22.
29. Buxton AE, Calkins H, Callans DJ, DiMarco JP, Fisher JD, et al. (2006) ACC/AHA/HRS 2006 key data elements and definitions for electrophysiological studies and procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (ACC/AHA/HRS Writing Committee to Develop Data Standards on Electrophysiology). Circulation 114(23): 2534-2570.
30. McNamara RL, Brass LM, Drozda JP Jr, Go AS, Halperin JL, et al. (2004) ACC/AHA key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Data Standards on Atrial Fibrillation). Circulation 109(25): 3223-3243.
31. Cannon CP, Battler A, Brindis RG, Cox JL, Ellis SG,et al. (2001) American College of Cardiology key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee). J Am Coll Cardiol 38(7): 2114 -2130.
32. Radford MJ, Arnold JM, Bennett SJ, Cinquegrani MP, Cleland JG, et al. (2005) ACC/AHA key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with chronic heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards Circulation. 112(12): 1888-1916.
33. Hendel RC, Budoff MJ, Cardella JF, Chambers CE, Dent JM, et al. (2009) ACC/AHA/ACR/ASE/ASNC/HRS/NASCI/RSNA/SAIP/SCAI/ SCCT/SCMR/SIR 2008 Key Data Elements and Definitions for Cardiac Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Data Standards for Cardiac Imaging). Circulation 119(1): 154-186.
34. Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, Roberts RS, Yusuf S, et al. (2000) Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators. N Engl J Med 342: 1385-1391.
35. Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, Silverman R, Leon A, et al. (2002) Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 346: 1854-1862.
36. Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, et al. (2004) Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 350: 2140-2150.
37. Linde C, Abraham WT, Gold MR, St John Sutton M, Ghio S, et al. (2008) Randomized trial of cardiac resynchronization in mildly symptomatic heart failure patients and in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction and previous heart failure symptoms. J Am Coll Cardiol 52: 1834-1843.
38. Rumsfeld J, Dehmer G, Brindis R, (2009) The National Cardiovascular Data Registry - its role in benchmarking and improving quality. US Cardiology 6: 11-15.
39. National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR). [Internet] Available: https://www.ncdr.com/webncdr/ Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
40. Health Level Seven International (HL7) website. Available: http://www.hl7.org/ Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
41. Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) and Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group (BRIDG) Model. Available: www.cdisc.org Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
42. Cancer Data Standards Registry and Repository (caDSR). Available: https://cabig.nci.nih.gov/concepts/caDSR/. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
43. Fragoso G, De Coronado S, Haber M, Hartel F, Wright L, (2004) Overview and utilization of the NCI thesaurus. Comp Funct Genomics 5(8): 648-654.
44. Hicks KA, James Hung HM, Mahaffey KW, Mehran R, Nissen SE,et al. (2010) Standardized Definitions for End Point Events in Cardiovascular Trials. Available: http://www.clinpage.com/images/uploads/endpoint-defs_11-16-2010.pdf. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
45. Fowler M (2003) UML distilled: A brief guide to the standard object modeling language. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing. 208 p.
46. ArgoUML. Available: http://argouml.tigris.org/. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
47. Ministério da Saúde. Departamento de Informática do SUS (DATASUS). Available: http://www2.datasus.gov.br/DATASUS/index.php. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
48. Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2). Available: http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
49. LinkedCT. Available: http://linkedct.org/. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
50. Linked Life Data. Available: http://linkedlifedata.com/. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
51. R Development Core Team (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available: http://www.R-project.org/ Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
52. Pacemaker Registry - Open Data Collection. Available: http://w3sampa.com/incor/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=213&Itemid=239 Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
53. knitr. Available: http://yihui.name/knitr/. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
54. Markdown. Available: http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
55. Pandoc: a universal document converter. Available: http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
56. rApach: Web Application Development with R and Apache. Available: http://rapache.net/. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
57. Github repository. Available: https://github.com/rpietro/GlocalRegistry. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
58. MINE: Maximal Information-based Nonparametric Exploration. Available: http://www.exploredata.net/. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
59. ggplot 2. Available: http://ggplot2.org/. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
60. BigQuery Services. Available: https://developers.google.com/apps-script/service_bigquery. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
61. Google Prediction Services. Available: https://developers.google.com/apps-script/service_prediction. Accessed 2013 Jun 3.
62. Bax JJ, Gorcsan J, (2009) Echocardiography and noninvasive imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the PROSPECT (Predictors of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) study in perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(21): 1933-1943.
63. Brooks D, Solway S, Gibbons WJ, (2002) ATS Statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Crit Care Med 166(1): 111-117.
64. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1994) SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User's Manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
65. Rector T, Kubo S, Cohn J, (1987) Patient's self-assessment of their congestive heart failure. Part 2: content, reliability and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart Fail 3: 198-209.
66. Stofmeel MA, Post MW, Kelder JC, Grobbee DE, Van Helmel NM, (2001) Changes in Quality-of-life After Pacemaker Implantation: Responsiveness of the AQUAREL Questionnaire. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 24(3): 288-95.
67. Zerhouni EA, (2004) Information access. NIH public access policy. Science 306(5703): 1895.