Psychological flexibility and the gains of acceptance-based treatment for post-bariatric surgery: Six-month follow-up and a test of the underlying model

Clinical Obesity

Volumn 2, Issue 1-2, 2012, Pages 15-24

  Weineland, S ^a   Hayes, S C ^b   Dahl, J ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceptance and commitment therapy; Bariatric surgery; Body dissatisfaction; Eating behaviour

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTANCE AND COMMITMENT THERAPY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BARIATRIC SURGERY; BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; BODY DISSATISFACTION; BODY MASS; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRESS SYNDROME; EATING DISORDER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL FLEXIBILITY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL PATIENT; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

EID: 84880808437     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17588111     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-8111.2012.00041.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. World Health Organization, WHO. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. WHO Obesity Technical Report Series 894. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. [WWW document]. URLhttp://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/obesity (accessed 2 February 2012).
2. Wadden TA, Butryn ML, Byrne KJ. Efficacy of lifestyle modi-fication for long-term weight control. Obesity 2004; 12: 151S- 162S.
3. Yanovski SZ, Yanovski JA. Obesity. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 591-602.
4. Elder KA, Wolfe BM. Bariatric surgery: a review of procedures and outcomes. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 2253-2271.
5. Maggard MA, Shugarman LR, Suttorp M et al. Meta-analysis: surgical treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 547-559.
6. Karlsson J, Taft C, Ryden A, Sjostrom L, Sullivan M. Ten-year trends in health-related quality of life after surgical and conven-tional treatment for severe obesity: the SOS intervention study. Int J Obes 2007; 31: 1248-1261.
7. Ferchak CV, Meneghini LF. Obesity, bariatric surgery and type 2 diabetes-a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2004; 20: 438-445.
8. Herpertz S, Kielmann R, Wolf AM, Senf W, Hedebrand J. Does obesity surgery improve psychosocial functioning? A systematic review. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003; 27: 1300-1314.
9. van Hout G, Boekestein P, Fortuin F, Pelle A, van Heck G. Psychosocial functioning following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 787-794.
10. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Klaghofer R, Krug L et al. Physical and psychosocial outcome in morbidly obese patients with and without bariatric surgery: a 41/2-year follow-up. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 321-330.
11. Sarwer DB, Wadden TA, Fabricatore AN. Psychosocial and behavioral aspects of bariatric surgery. Obesity 2005; 13: 639-648.
12. van Hout G, van Heck G. Bariatric psychology, psychological aspects of weight loss surgery. Obes Facts 2009; 2: 10-15.
13. Puhl RM, Heuer CA. The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity 2009; 17: 941-964.
14. Wang SS, Brownell KD, Wadden TA. The influence of the stigma of obesity on overweight individuals. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004; 28: 1333-1337.
15. Annis NM, Cash TF, Hrabosky JI. Body image and psycho-social differences among stable average weight, currently over-weight, and formerly overweight women: the role of stigmatizing experiences. Body Image 2004; 1: 155-167.
16. Dixon J, Dixon M, ÓBrien P. Body image: appearance orientation and evaluation in the severely obese. Changes with weight loss. Obes Surg 2002; 12: 65-71.
17. Gibbons LM, Sarwer DB, Crerand CE et al. Previous weight loss experiences of bariatric surgery candidates: how much have patients dieted prior to surgery? Surg Obes Relat Dis 2006; 2: 159-164.
18. Sarwer DB, Wadden TA, Moore RH et al. Changes in quality of life and body image after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2010; 6: 608-614.
19. Kinzl J, Traweger C, Trefalt E, Biebl W. Psychosocial conse-quences of weight loss following gastric banding for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 2003; 13: 105-110.
20. Steffen KJ, Sarwer DB, Thompson JK et al. Predictors of sat-isfaction with excess skin and desire for body contouring after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2012; 8: 92-97.
21. de Zwaan M, Hilbert A, Swan-Kremeier L et al. Comprehen-sive interview assessment of eating behavior 18-35 months after gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2010; 6: 79-85.
22. Stice E, Akutagawa D, Gaggar A, Agras WS. Negative affect moderates the relation between dieting and binge eating. Int J Eat Disord 2000; 27: 218-229.
23. Guerdjikova A, West-Smith L, McElroy SL et al. Emotional eating and emotional eating alternatives in subjects undergoing bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2007; 17: 1091-1096.
24. Walfish S. Self-assessed emotional factors contributing to increased weight gain in pre-surgical bariatric patients. Obes Surg 2004; 14: 1402-1405.
25. Colles SL, Dixon JB, ÓBrien PE. Grazing and loss of control related to eating: two high-risk factors following bariatric surgery. Obesity 2008; 16: 615-622.
26. White M, Kalarchian M, Masheb R, Marcus M, Grilo C. Loss of control over eating predicts outcomes in bariatric surgery patients:aprospective, 24-month follow-up study.J Clin Psychiatry 2010; 71: 175-184.
27. Saunders R. 'Grazing': a high-risk behavior. Obes Surg 2004; 14: 98-102.
28. Ashton K, Heinberg L, Windover A, Merrell J. Positive response to binge eating intervention enhances postoperative weight loss. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2011; 7: 315-320.
29. Leahey TM, Crowther JH, Irwin SR. A cognitive-behavioral mindfulness group therapy intervention for the treatment of binge eating in bariatric surgery patients. Cogn Behav Pract 2008; 15: 364-375.
30. Lier H, Biringer E, Stubhaug B, Tangen T. The impact of preoperative counseling on postoperative treatment adherence in bariatric surgery patients: a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2012; 87: 336-342.
31. Kalarchian MA, Marcus MD, Courcoulas AP et al. Optimiz-ing long-term weight control after bariatric surgery: a pilot study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2011 (in press).
32. Weineland S, Arvidsson D, Kakoulidis TP, Dahl J. Acceptance and commitment therapy for bariatric surgery patients, a pilot RCT. Obes Res Clin Pract 2012; 6: 21-30.
33. Forman EM, Butryn ML, Hoffman KL, Herbert JD. An open trial of an acceptance-based behavioral intervention for weight loss. Cogn Behav Pract 2009; 16: 223-235.
34. Lillis J, Hayes S, Bunting K, Masuda A. Teaching accep-tance and mindfulness to improve the lives of the obese: a pre-liminary test of a theoretical model. Ann Behav Med 2009; 37: 58-69.
35. Tapper K, Shaw C, Ilsley J et al. Exploratory randomised controlled trial of a mindfulness-based weight loss intervention for women. Appetite 2009; 52: 396-404.
36. Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Accep-tance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther 2006; 44: 1-25.
37. Lillis J, Levin ME, Hayes SC. Exploring the relationship between body mass index and health-related quality of life: a pilot study of the impact of weight self-stigma and experiential avoid-ance. J Health Psychol 2011; 16: 722-727.
38. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, ÓConnell KA. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psy-chometric properties and results of the international field trial a report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 299-310.
39. Luce KH, Crowther JH. The reliability of the eating disorder examination-self-report questionnaire version (EDE-Q). Int J Eat Disord 1999; 25: 349-351.
40. Ghaderi ATA, Scott B. The reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the Body Shape Questionnaire. Scand J Psychol 2004; 45: 319-324.
41. Lillis J, Hayes SC. Measuring avoidance and inflexibility in weight related problems. Int J Behav Consult Ther 2008; 4: 348-354.
42. Lundgren T, Dahl J, Hayes S. Evaluation of mediators of change in the treatment of epilepsy with acceptance and commit-ment therapy. J Behav Med 2008; 31: 225-235.
43. Raudenbush SW, Xiao-Feng L. Effects of study duration, fre-quency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change. Psychol Methods 2001; 6: 387-401.
44. Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL. Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1991.
45. Wackerly D, Mendenhall W, Scheaffer R. Mathematical Sta-tistics with Applications, 7th edn. Duxbury Press: Pacific Grove, CA, 2008.
46. Cohen J. Statistical Power for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, 1988.
47. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods 2002; 7: 83-104.
48. Preacher K, Hayes A. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 2008; 40: 879-891.
49. McCracken LM, Gutièrrez-Martìnez O. Processes of change in psychological flexibility in an interdisciplinary group-based treatment for chronic pain based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Behav Res Ther 2011; 49: 267-274.
50. Wicksell RK, Olsson GL, Hayes SC. Psychological flexibility as a mediator of improvement in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for patients with chronic pain following whiplash. Eur J Pain 2010; 14: 1059.e1-1059.e11.
51. Leahey TM, Bond DS, Irwin SR, Crowther JH, Wing RR. When is the best time to deliver behavioral intervention to bariatric surgery patients: before or after surgery? Surg Obes Relat Dis 2011; 5: 99-102.
52. Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Andersson G. Internet-administered cognitive behavior therapy for health problems: a systematic review. J Behav Med 2008; 31: 169-177.
53. Ritterband L, Tate D. The science of internet interventions. Ann Behav Med 2009; 38: 1-3.