Look Again: Effects of Brain Images and Mind-Brain Dualism on Lay Evaluations of Research

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1397-1405

  Hook, Cayce J ^a   Farah, Martha J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; BRAIN SCINTISCANNING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN; CULTURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; JUDGMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MIND-BODY RELATIONS, METAPHYSICAL; OXYGEN; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RESEARCH; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84880802454     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00407     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Blakeslee, S. (2000, March 14). Just what's going on inside that head of yours? The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2000/03/14/health/just-what-s-going-on-insidethat- head-of-yours.html.
2. Bloom, P. (2006, June 26). Seduced by the flickering lights of the brain. Seed Magazine. Retrieved from seedmagazine.com/content/article/seduced_by_the_flickering_lights_of_the_brain/.
3. Brammer, M. (2003). Editorial. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 12, 373-374.
4. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet highquality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
5. Callicott, J. H., & Weinberger, D. R. (1999). Functional brain imaging: Future prospects for clinical practice. In S. H. Weissman, M. Sabshin, & H. Eist (Eds.), Psychiatry in the new millennium (p. 120). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
6. Carey, B. (2006, February 5). Searching for the person in the brain. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2006/02/05/weekinreview/05carey.html.
7. Check, E. (2005). Ethicists urge caution over emotive power of brain scans. Nature, 435, 254.
8. Crawford, M. B. (2008). The limits of neuro-talk. The New Atlantis, 19, 65-78.
9. Demertzi, A., Liew, C., Ledoux, D., Bruno, M.-A., Sharpe, M., Laureys, S., et al. (2009). Dualism persists in the science of mind. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1157, 1-9.
10. Gerard, E., & Peterson, B. S. (2003). Developmental processes and brain imaging studies in Tourette syndrome. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55, 13-22.
11. Gordon, E. (2001). Integrative psychophysiology. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 42, 95-108.
12. Greene, E., & Cahill, B. S. (2012). Effects of neuroimaging evidence on mock juror decision making. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30, 280-296.
13. Gruber, D., & Dickerson, J. A. (2012). Persuasive images in popular science: Testing judgments of scientific reasoning and credibility. Public Understanding of Science, 21, 938-948.
14. Gurley, J. R., & Marcus, D. K. (2008). The effects of neuroimaging and brain injury on insanity defenses. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26, 85-97.
15. Illes, J., De Vries, R., Cho, M. K., & Schraedley-Desmond, P. (2006). ELSI priorities for brain imaging. The American Journal of Bioethics, 6, W24-W31.
16. Illes, J., Moser, M. A., McCormick, J. B., Racine, E., Blakeslee, S., Caplan, A., et al. (2010). Neurotalk: Improving the communication of neuroscience research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 61-69.
17. Johnson, S. B., Blum, R. W., & Giedd, J. N. (2009). Adolescent maturity and the brain: The promise and pitfalls of neuroscience research in adolescent health policy. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 216-221.
18. Keehner, M., Mayberry, L., & Fischer, M. (2011). Different clues from different views: The role of image format in public perceptions of neuroimaging results. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 422-428.
19. Khoshbin, L. S., & Khoshbin, S. (2007). Imaging the mind, minding the image: An historical introduction to brain imaging and the law. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 33, 171.
20. Lee, N., Broderick, A. J., & Chamberlain, L. (2007). What is "neuromarketing"? A discussion and agenda for future research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63, 199-204.
21. Marks, J. H. (2010). A neuroskeptic's guide to neuroethics and national security. AJOB Neuroscience, 1, 4-12.
22. Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1-23.
23. McCabe, D. P., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107, 343-352.
24. McCabe, D. P., Castel, A. D., & Rhodes, M. G. (2011). The influence of fMRI lie detection evidence on juror decision-making. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 566-577.
25. Merckelbach, H., Devilly, G. J., & Rassin, E. (2002). Alters in dissociative identity disorder: Metaphors or genuine entities? Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 481-497.
26. Michael, R. B., Newman, E. J., Vuorre, M., Cumming, G., & Garry, M. (2013). On the (non)persuasive power of a brain image. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Advance on-line publication. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0391-6
27. Nicholson, C. (2006). Thinking it over: fMRI and psychological science. APS Observer, 19, 20-25.
28. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision-making, 5, 411-419.
29. Poole, S. (2012, September 6). Your brain on pseudoscience: The rise of popular neurobollocks. The New Statesman. Retrieved from www.newstatesman.com/culture/books/2012/ 09/your-brain-pseudoscience.
30. Ratcliff, R. (1998). The role of mathematical psychology in experimental psychology. Australian Journal of Psychology, 50, 129-130.
31. Sarter, M., Berntson, G. G., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1996). Brain imaging and cognitive neuroscience: Toward strong inference in attributing function to structure. American Psychologist, 51, 13-21.
32. Schweitzer, N. J., Baker, D. A., & Risko, E. F. (submitted). Fooled by the brain: Re-examining the influence of neuroimages.
33. Schweitzer, N. J., & Saks, M. J. (2011). Neuroimage evidence and the insanity defense. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 592-607.
34. Schweitzer, N. J., Saks, M. J., Murphy, E. R., Roskies, A. L., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Gaudet, L. M. (2011). Neuroimages as evidence in a mens rea defense: No impact. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 357-393.
35. Silbersweig, D. A., & Stern, E. (2001). Functional neuroimaging and neuropsychology: Convergence, advances and new directions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 1-2.
36. Stanovich, K. E. (1989). Implicit philosophies of mind: The dualism scale and its relation to religiosity and belief in extrasensory perception. Journal of Psychology, 123, 5.
37. Weisberg, D. S. (2008). Caveat lector: The presentation of neuroscience information in the popular media. Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 6, 51-56.
38. Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 470-477.