Behavior bounding: Toward effective comparisons of agents & humans

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 727-732

  Wallace, Scott A ^a   Laird, John E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENT BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR COMPARISONS; COMPLEX AGENT; COMPUTER MODELS; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; MODEL BASED APPROACH; TURNING TEST;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BENCHMARKING; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION COMPUTING;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84880792530     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. th National Conf on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1123-1128. AAAI Press/MIT Press, 1994.
2. D. Haussler. Quantifying inductive bias: Al learning algorithms and Valiant's learning framework. Ar-tificial Intelligence, 36:177-221, 1988. (Pubitemid 18655803)
3. B. E. John and D. E. Kieras. The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: Comparison and contrast. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 3(4):320-351, 1996.
4. R. M Jones, J. E. Laird, P. E. Nielsen, K. J. Coulter, P. Kenny, and F. V. Koss. Automated intelligent pilots for combat flight simulation. AI Magazine, 20(I):27-42, 1999.
5. P. Lucas. Analysis of notions of diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence, 105:295-343, 1998. (Pubitemid 128398279)
6. P. M. Murphy and M. J. Paz-zani. Revision of production system rule-bases. In Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf on Machine Learning, pages 199-207. Morgan Kaufmann, 1994.