Detecting & avoiding interference between goals in intelligent agents

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 721-726

  Thangarajah, John ^a   Padgham, Lin ^a   Winikoff, Michael ^a  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS AND DATA STRUCTURES; DETECT AND AVOID; NEGATIVE INTERACTION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EID: 84880789566     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Craig Boutilier and Ronen 1. Brafman. Planning with concurrent interacting actions. In Proceedings of the Nth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-97), 1997.
2. Paolo Busetta, Ralph Ronnquist, Andrew Hodgson, and Andrew Lucas. JACK Intelligent Agents - Components for Intelligent Agents in Java. Technical report, Agent Oriented Software Pty. Ltd, Melbourne, Australia, 1998.
3. Bradley J. Clement and Edmund H. Durfee. Identifying and resolving conflicts among agents with hierarchical plans. In AAAI Workshop on Negotiation: Settling Conflicts and Identifying Opportunities, AAAI Technical Report WS-99-12, 1999.
4. Bradley J. Clement and Edmund H. Durfee. Theory for coordinating concurrent hierarchical planning agents using summary information. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-99), pages 495-502, July 1999.
5. Bradley J. Clement, Anthony C. Barrett, Gregg R. Rabideau, and Edmund H. Durfee. Using abstraction in planning and scheduling. In Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Planning (ECP-OI), September 2001.
6. Mark d'Inverno, David Kinny, Michael Luck, and Michael Wooldridge. A formal specification of dMARS. In Intelligent Agents IV: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, 1998.
7. John F. Horty and Martha E. Pollack. Evaluating new options in the context of existing plans. Artificial Intelligence, 127:199-220,2001.
8. Marcus J. Huber. JAM: A BDl-theoretic mobile agent architecture. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents '99), pages 236-243, May 1999.
9. F. F. Ingrand, M. P. Georgeff, and A. S. Rao. An architecture for real-time reasoning and system control. IEEE Expert, 7(6), 1992.
10. M. E. Pollack. Overloading intentions for efficient practical reasoning. Nous, 25(4):513-536,1991.
11. Anand S. Rao and Michael P. Georgeff. BDI-Agents from theory to practice. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems ICMAS-95, San Francisco, USA, 1995.
12. Catherine Tessier, Laurent Chaudron, and Heinz-Jurgen Miiller, editors. Conflicting Agents: Conflict Management in Multi-Agent Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000. ISBN 0-7923-7210-7.
13. John Thangarajah, Lin Padgham, and James Harland. Representation and reasoning for goals in BDI agents. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Australasian Computer Science Conference (ACSC2002), Melbourne, Australia, 2002.
14. John Thangarajah, Michael Winikoff, Lin Padgham, and Klaus Fischer. Avoiding resource conflicts in intelligent agents. In Proceedings of the I5th European Conference on Artifical Intelligence 2002 (ECAI2002), Lyon, France, 2002."
15. John Thangarajah, Lin Padgham, and Michael Winikoff. Detecting and exploiting positive goal interaction in intelligent agents. In Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (A A MAS 2003), Melbourne, Australia, 2003.
16. Michael Winikoff, Lin Padgham, James Harland, and John Thangarajah. Declarative & procedural goals in intelligent agent systems. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2002), Toulouse, France, April 2002.