Nano-Ethics

Nanotechnology in the Agri-Food Sector: Implications for the Future

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 271-281

  Strand, Roger ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Ethical research; Nano ethics; Nanotechnology innovation; Regulatory control; Risk; Societal debate

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880754802     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9783527634798.ch16     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Hunt, G., and Metha, M. (eds) (2006) Nanotechnology, Risk, Ethics and Law, Earthscan, London.
2. Allhof, F., Lin, P., Moor, J., and Weckert, J. (eds) (2007) NanoEthics. The Ethical and Social Implication of Nanotechnology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
3. Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering (2004) Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. The Royal Society, London, UK. Available at: http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm (accessed 9 November 2010).
4. Tegart, G. (2006) Environmental, social, legal and ethical aspects of the development of nanotechnologies in Australia. A report from the National Academies Forum for the National Nanotechnology Strategy Taskforce, Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources, National Academies Forum, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
5. National Science Foundation (2001) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology, Report from the Workshop held at the National Science Foundation, 28-29 September 2000 (eds M.C. Roco and W. Bainbridge).
6. UNESCO (2006) The Ethics and Politics of Nanotechnology, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Paris.
7. Kjølberg, K., and Wickson, F. (2007) Social and ethical interactions with nano: mapping the early literature. NanoEthics 1, 89-104.
8. Strand, R. (2001) ELSA studies of nanoscience and nanotechnology, Memo to the COST Nanoscience and-Technology Advisory Group (NanoSTAG). Available at: http://www.stage-research.net/STAGE/nanotechnology/nanostag-elsa.pdf (accessed 16 November 2010).
9. Van de Poel, I. (2008) How should we do nanoethics? A network approach for discerning ethical issues in nanotechnology. N anoEthics 2, 35-38.
10. ETC Group (Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration) (2003) No small matter II: The case for a global moratorium. Size matters! Available at: http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/165/01/occ.paper_ nanosafety.pdf (accessed 16 November 2010).
11. Friends of the Earth (2006) Nanomaterials, sunscreens and cosmetics: small ingredients, big risks. Available at: http://nano.foe.org.au/node/100 (accessed 16 November 2010).
12. Friends of the Earth (2008) Out of the laboratory and onto our plates: nanotechnology in food and agriculture. Available at: http://nano.foe.org.au/node/227 (accessed 16 November 2010).
13. Roco, M.C., and Bainbridge, W.S. (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance: integrating from the nanoscale. J. Nanopart. Res. 4, 281-295.
14. Roco, M.C., and Bainbridge, W.S. (eds) (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance, NSF-DOC Report, Arlington, VA.
15. Merton, R.K. (1942) The normative structure of science, in The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (ed. N.W. Storer), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1973, pp. 267-278.
16. Nordmann, A. (2004) Converging technologies-Shaping the future of European societies, Report for the European Commission via an Expert Group on Foresighting the New Technology Wave, European Commission, Brussels. Nydal and Strand 2008 probably to go in here.
17. Nydal, R., and Strand R. (2008) God nanoetikk-god nanoteknologiutvikling. Etikk i praksis (Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics) 1, 33-51.
18. Gavelin, K., Wilson, R., and Doubleday, R. (2007) Democratic Technologies? The Final Report of the Nanotechnology Engagement Group (NEG), Involve, London.
19. Pickering, A. (1995) The Mangle of Practice, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
20. Kjølberg, K., Delgado-Ramos, G.C., Wickson, F., and Strand, R. (2008) Models of governance for converging technologies. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 20, 83-97.
21. European Commission (2007) Taking European knowledge society seriously, Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission.
22. European Commission (2008) Commission recommendation of 07/02/2008 on a Code of Conduct for Responsible Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies Research, C (2008) 424, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/nanocode-rec_pe0894c_en.pdf (accessed 16 November 2010).
23. European Commission (2000) Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle, COM (2000) 1, Brussels.
24. European Commission (2001) White Paper on European Governance, COM (2001) 428, Brussels.