메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 448-449

Editorial rejects? Novelty, schnovelty!

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84880732473     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.007     Document Type: Short Survey
Times cited : (17)

References (6)
  • 1
    • 84880722680 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Addressing editor(ial) malpractice in scientific journals
    • Cooke S.J., Lapointe N.W.R. Addressing editor(ial) malpractice in scientific journals. Ideas Ecol. Evol. 2012, 5:84-92.
    • (2012) Ideas Ecol. Evol. , vol.5 , pp. 84-92
    • Cooke, S.J.1    Lapointe, N.W.R.2
  • 2
    • 0033539227 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The criteria used by editors of scientific dental journals in the assessment of manuscripts submitted for publication
    • Radford D.R., et al. The criteria used by editors of scientific dental journals in the assessment of manuscripts submitted for publication. Br. Dental J. 1999, 187:376-379.
    • (1999) Br. Dental J. , vol.187 , pp. 376-379
    • Radford, D.R.1
  • 3
    • 56749183653 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication
    • Bornmann L., et al. A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication. Scientometrics 2008, 77:415-432.
    • (2008) Scientometrics , vol.77 , pp. 415-432
    • Bornmann, L.1
  • 4
    • 0038313097 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Impartial judgment by the "gatekeepers" of science: fallibility and accountability in the peer review process
    • Hojat M., et al. Impartial judgment by the "gatekeepers" of science: fallibility and accountability in the peer review process. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. 2003, 8:75-96.
    • (2003) Adv. Health Sci. Educ. , vol.8 , pp. 75-96
    • Hojat, M.1
  • 5
    • 81355164350 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The competition for attention and the evolution of science
    • Thorngate W., et al. The competition for attention and the evolution of science. JASSS 2011, 14:17.
    • (2011) JASSS , vol.14 , pp. 17
    • Thorngate, W.1
  • 6
    • 0028219495 scopus 로고
    • The screening review system - fair or foul?
    • Varki A.P. The screening review system - fair or foul?. J. Clin. Invest. 1994, 93:1871-1874.
    • (1994) J. Clin. Invest. , vol.93 , pp. 1871-1874
    • Varki, A.P.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.