Integrated assessments of emerging food technologies - Some options and challenges

Climate Change and Sustainable Development: Ethical Perspectives on Land Use and Food Production

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 275-279

  Forsberg, E M ^a  

^a OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Food technologies; Integrated assessments; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880727139     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-753-0_41     Document Type: Chapter

References (12)

1. Collingridge, D. (1980). The Social Control of Technology. New York, USA: St Martin's Press.
2. Council of the European Union. (2006). Renewed Eu Sustainable Development Strategy. http://register.consilium.europa. eu/pdf/en/06/st10/st10117.en06.pdf Accessed 20.12.2011.
3. European Commission. (2004) Towards a European Strategy for Nanotechnology. http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/nano-com-en-new.pdf Accessed 05.01.2012.
4. Gaskell, G., Stares, S., Allandsdottir, A., Allum, N., Castro, P., Esmer, Y., Fischler, C., Jackson, J., Kronberger, N., Hampel, J., Mejlgaard, N., Quintanilha, A., Rammer, A., Revuelta, G., Stoneman, P., Torgersen, H. and Wagner, W. (2010). Europeans and Biotechnology 2010. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/public-opinion/archives/ebs/ebs-341-winds-en.pdf Accessed 05.01.2012.
5. Joseph, T. and Morrison, M. (2006). Nanotechnology in Agriculture and Food. ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/nanotechnology-in-agriculture-and-food.pdf Accessed 20.12.2011.
6. Lundvall, B.-Å. (eds.) (1992). National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London, UK and New York, USA: Pinter.
7. Lyndhurst, B. (2009). An Evidence Review of Public Attitudes to Emerging Food Technologies. Social Science Research Unit, Food Standards Agency. http://www.food.gov. uk/multimedia/pdfs/emergingfoodtech.pdf Accessed 20.12.2011.
8. Scrase, J. I. and Sheate, W. R. (2002). Integration and Integrated Approaches to Assessment: What Do They Man for the Environment? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 4:275-294.
9. Selin, C. (2011). Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology. Science & Engineering Ethics 17:723-737.
10. Smits, R. E., Van Merkerk, R., Guston, D. H. and Sarewitz, D. (2010). The Role of Technology Assessment in Systemic Innovation Policy. In The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy, edited by Ruud E. Smits, Stefan Kuhlmann and Philip Shapira, 387-416. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar.
11. The European Commission. (2009). Mainstreaming Sustainable Development into Eu Policies: 2009 Review of the European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ. do?uri=COM:2009:0400:FIN:EN:PDF Accessed 20.12.2011.
12. United Nations General Assembly. (2005). 2005 World Summit Outcome. 60/1. http://data.unaids.org/Topics/UniversalAccess/worldsummitoutcome-resolution-24oct2005-en.pdf Accessed 20.12.2011.