Rehabilitation and improvement of Guilin urban water environment: Function-oriented management

Journal of Environmental Sciences (China)

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1477-1482

  Pei, Yuansheng ^a   Zuo, Hua ^b   Luan, Zhaokun ^c   Gao, Sijia ^a  

^a Beijing Normal University   (China)

^b Environmental Protection Bureau of Qingdao   (China)

^c RESEARCH CENTER FOR ECO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Ecological engineering; Hydrology connectivity; Landscape reconstruction; Urban water environment; Vegetation buffer strips; Water conservancy

Indexed keywords

BUFFER STRIP; ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING; LANDSCAPE RECONSTRUCTION; URBAN WATER ENVIRONMENTS; WATER CONSERVANCY;

ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; POPULATION STATISTICS; URBAN GROWTH; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY; WATERWORKS;

WATER POLLUTION;

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING; LANDSCAPE; POLLUTION CONTROL; RECONSTRUCTION; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; URBAN AREA; VEGETATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER SUPPLY;

CHINA; GUANGXI ZHUANGZU; GUILIN;

EID: 84880724435     PISSN: 10010742     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60189-2     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Booth DB, Karr JR, Schauman S, Konrad CP, Morley SA, Larson MG, et al. Reviving urban streams: Land use, hydrology, biology, and human behavior. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2004, 40(5):1351-1364.
2. Brookes A, Shields FD River Channel Restoration: Guiding Principles for Sustainable Projects 1996, John Wiley, Chichester.
3. Findlay SJ, Taylor MP Why rehabilitate urban river systems?. Area 2006, 38(3):312-325.
4. Freeman MC, Pringle CM, Jackson CR Hydrologic connectivity and the contribution of stream headwaters to ecological integrity at regional scales. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2007, 43(1):5-14.
5. Gosselin F Redefining ecological engineering to promote its integration with sustainable development and tighten its links with the whole of ecology. Ecological Engineering 2008, 32(3):199-205.
6. Krozer Y, Hophmayer-Tokich S, van Meerendonk H, Tijsma S, Vos E Innovations in the water chain - experiences in The Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production 2010, 18(5):439-446.
7. Levell AP, Chang H Monitoring the channel process of a stream restoration project in an urbanizing watershed: A case study of Kelley Creek, Oregon, USA. River Research and Applications 2008, 24(2):169-182.
8. Moglia M, Sharma AK, Maheepala S Multi-criteria decision assessments using Subjective Logic: Methodology and the case of urban water strategies. Journal of Hydrology 2012, 452-453:180-189.
9. Ormerod SJ A golden age of river restoration science?. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 2004, 14(6):543-549.
10. Postel S Rivers of life: the challenge of restoring health to freshwater ecosystems. Water Science and Technology 2002, 45(11):3-8.
11. Rai SH Water management for a megacity: National Capital Territory of Delhi. Water Resources Management 2011, 25(9):2267-2278.
12. Sanon S, Hein T, Douven W, Winkler P Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: The case of an urban floodplain in Vienna, Austria. Journal of Environmental Management 2012, 111:159-172.
13. Tullos DD, Penrose DL, Jennings GD, Cope WG Analysis of functional traits in reconfigured channels: implications for the bioassessment and disturbance of river restoration. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 2009, 28(1):80-92.
14. Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD, Groffman PM, Morgan RP The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 2005, 24(3):706-723.
15. Zhang C, Yuan DX, Cao JH Analysis of the environmental sensitivities of a typical dynamic epikarst system at the Nongla monitoring site, Guangxi, China. Environmental Geology 2005, 47(5):615-619.