Graphical displays in eco-feedback: A cognitive approach

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8015 LNCS, Issue PART 4, 2013, Pages 486-495

  Ford, Rebecca ^a   Karlin, Beth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Eco feedback; Graphical Display; Information Overload; Psychology; User Interface

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE APPROACHES; ECO FEEDBACKS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; GRAPHICAL DISPLAYS; INFORMATION OVERLOADS; NUMBER OF DATUM; PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH; PSYCHOLOGY;

DATA PROCESSING; PRODUCT DESIGN;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 84880720201     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39253-5_54     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Darby, S.: Smart metering: what potential for householder engagement? Building Research & Information 38(5), 442-457 (2010)
2. Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., Landay, J.: The Design of Eco-Feedback Technology. In: Proc. CHI 2010, pp. 1999-2008. ACM Press (2010)
3. Ehrhardt-Martinez, K., Donnelly, K.A., Laitner, J.A.: Advanced metering initiatives and residential feedback programs: a meta-review for household electricity-saving opportunities. Technical report, ACEEE (2010)
4. Allcott, H., Mullainathan, S.: Behavior and Energy Policy. Science 327, 1204-1205 (2010)
5. EPRI: Residential Electricity Use Feedback: A Research Synthesis and Economic Framework. Technical report, EPRI (2009)
6. Fischer, C.: Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency 1, 79-104 (2008) (Pubitemid 351796268)
7. Fitzpatrick, G., Smith, G.: Technology-Enabled Feedback on Domestic Energy Consumption: Articulating a set of design concerns. Pervasive Computing 8, 37-44 (2009)
8. Pierce, J., Fan, C., Lomas, D., Marcu, G., Paulos, E.: Some consideration on the (in)effectiveness of residential energy feedback systems. In: Proc. DIS 2010, pp. 244-247. ACM Press (2010)
9. Strengers, Y.: Designing Eco-Feedback Systems for Everyday Life. In: Proc. CHI 2011, pp. 2135-2144. ACM Press (2011)
10. Froehlich, J., Larson, E., Gupta, S., Cohn, G., Reynolds, M.S., Patel, S.N.: Disaggregated End-Use Energy Sensing for the Smart Grid. Pervasive Computing 10, 28-39 (2011)
11. Kosslyn, S.M.: Understanding charts and graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology 3, 185-225 (1989)
12. Spoehr, K.T., Lehmkuhle, S.W.: Visual Information Processing. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco (1982)
13. Eppler, M.J., Mengis, J.: The Concept of Information Overload: A Review of Literature from Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and Related Disciplines. Information Society 20, 325-344 (2004) (Pubitemid 39454128)
14. Duncan, J.: Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 3, 501-517 (1984)
15. Miller, G.A.: The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. The Psychological Review 63, 81-97 (1956)
16. Eriksen, C.W., Hoffman, J.E.: The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics 14, 155-160 (1973)
17. Redish, J.C.: Reading to learn to do. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 32, 289-293 (1989)
18. Levie, W.H., Lentz, R.: Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Education Community Technology Journal 30, 195-232 (1982)
19. Levin, J.R.: On functions of pictures in prose. In: Pirozzolo, F.J., Wittrock, M.C. (eds.) Neuropsychological and Cognitive Processes in Reading, pp. 203-228. Academic Press, New York (1981)
20. Karlin, B., Ford, R.: The Usability Perception Scale (UPscale): A measure for evaluating feedback displays. In: Proc. HCII 2013, Springer (2013)
21. Galesic, M., Garcia-Retamero, R.: Graph literacy: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 31, 444-457 (2011)
22. Schwartz, L.M., Woloshin, S., Black, W.C., Welch, H.G.: The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine 127, 966-972 (1997) (Pubitemid 27516607)