Can EQ-5D and 15D be used interchangeably in economic evaluations? Assessing quality of life in post-stroke patients

European Journal of Health Economics

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 539-550

  Lunde, Lene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

15D; Empirical performance; EQ 5D; Multi attribute utility instruments; Post stroke patients

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF CARE; STROKE PATIENT; AGE; BODY MASS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMORBIDITY; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIOECONOMICS; VERY ELDERLY;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BODY MASS INDEX; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEX FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STROKE;

EID: 84880719290     PISSN: 16187598     EISSN: 16187601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-012-0402-y     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Barton, G.R.; Sach, T.H.; Avery, A.J.; Jenkinson, C.; Doherty, M.; Whynes, D.K.; Muir, K.R.: A comparisons of the performance of EQ-5D and SF-6D for individuals aged ≥45 years. Health Econ. 17, 815-832 (2008)
2. Bosch, J.L.; Hunink, M.G.M.: Comparison of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQol EQ-5D in patients treated for intermittent claudication. Qual. Life Res. 9, 591-601 (2000) (Pubitemid 32146988)
3. Brazier J.; Deverill M.; Green C.; Harper R.; Booth A.: A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Health Technol. Assess. 3(NO9), (1999)
4. Brazier, J.; Roberts, J.; Tsuchiya, A.; Busschbach, J.: A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ. 13, 873-884 (2004) (Pubitemid 39264234)
5. Conner-Spady, B.; Suarez-Almazor, M.: Variation in the estimation of quality-adjusted life-years by different preference-based instruments. Med. Care 41(7), 791-801 (2003)
6. Dolan, P.: Modelling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med. Care 35(11), 1095-1108 (1997) (Pubitemid 127453463)
7. Fjærtoft, H.; Indredavik, B.: Kostnadsvurderinger ved hjerneslag. Tidsskr Nor Lægeeforen 6(127), 744-747 (2007)
8. Fosså, S.D.; Dahl, A.A.: Short form 36 and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. A comparison based on patients with testicular cancer. J. Psychosom. Res. 52, 79-87 (2002) (Pubitemid 34192887)
9. Hannerz, H.; Nielsen, M.L.: Life expectancies among survivors of acute cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 32, 1739-1744 (2001) (Pubitemid 32772200)
10. Kleinmann, L.; Zodet, M.W.; Hakim, Z.; Aledort, J.; Barker, C.; Chan, K.; Krupp, L.; Revicki, D.: Psychometric evaluation of the fatigue scale for use in chronic hepatitis. Qual. Life Res. 9(5), 499-508 (2000) (Pubitemid 32009860)
11. Lamers, L.M.; Bouwmans, C.A.M.; van Straten, A.; Donker, M.C.H.; Hakkaart, L.: Comparisons of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in mental health patients. Health Econ. 15, 1229-1236 (2006) (Pubitemid 44696950)
12. Longworth, L.; Bryan, S.: An empirical comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D in liver transplant patients. Health Econ. 12, 1061-1067 (2003) (Pubitemid 38035310)
13. Mackay, J.; Mensah, G.: Atlas of heart disease and stroke. http://www.who.org. 1 March 2008
14. Saarni, S.I.; Härkänen, T.; Sintonen, H.; Suvisaari, J.; Koskinen, S.; Aromaa, A.; Lönnquist, J.: The impact of 29 chronic conditions on health related quality of life: a general population survey in Finland using 15D and EQ-5D. Qual. Life Res. 15, 1403-1414 (2006) (Pubitemid 44673614)
15. Seymour, J.; McNamee, P.; Scott, A.; Tinelli, M.: Shedding new light onto the ceiling and floor? A quantile regression approach to compare EQ-5D and SF-6D responses. Health Econ. 19, 683-696 (2010)
16. Shrout, P.E.; Fleiss, J.L.: Intraclass correlation: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol. Bull. 86(2), 420-428 (1979)
17. Sintonen, H.: Comparing properties of the 15D and the EQ-5D in measuring health-related quality of life. Arch. Hell. Med. 18(2), 156-160 (2001) (Pubitemid 33134323)
18. Sintonen, H.: The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Ann. Med. 33(5), 328-336 (2001) (Pubitemid 32675373)
19. Stavem, K.: Reliability, validity and responsiveness of two multi attribute utility measures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Qual. Life Res. 8, 45-54 (1999) (Pubitemid 29362745)
20. Stavem, K.; Bjørnæs, H.; Lossius, M.I.: Properties of the 15D and the EQ-5D utility measures in a community sample of people with epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 44, 179-189 (2001) (Pubitemid 32452227)
21. Stavem, K.; Frøland, S.S.; Hellum, K.B.: Comparison of preference-based utilities of the 15D, EQ-5D and SF-6D in patients with HIV/AIDS. Qual. Life Res. 14, 971-980 (2005) (Pubitemid 40685221)
22. Streiner, D.L.; Health, Normann.G.R.; Scales, Measurements.: A practical guide to their development and use, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)
23. Sulter, G.; Steen, C.; De Keyser, J.: Use of the Barthel Index and Modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke trials. Stroke 30, 1538-1541 (1999) (Pubitemid 29379599)
24. Szende A, Oppe M, Devlin N, (eds.): EQ-5D value sets inventory, comparative review and user guide. Euroqol Group Monographs vol. 2. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
25. Van Exel, N.J.A.; Scholte op Reimer, W.J.M.; Koopmanschap, M.A.: Assessment of post-stroke quality of life in cost-effectiveness studies: the usefulness of the Barthel Index and the EuroQol-5D. Qual. Life Res. 13, 427-433 (2004) (Pubitemid 38392271)