메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 970-971

Peer review in scholarly biomedical journals: A few things that make a big difference

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84880714463     PISSN: 10118934     EISSN: 15986357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.7.970     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (5)

References (12)
  • 1
    • 78650342436 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The peer-review process for articles in Iran's scientific journals
    • Ardakan MA, Mirzaie SA, Sheikhshoaei F. The peer-review process for articles in Iran's scientific journals. J Sch Pub 2011; 42: 243-61.
    • (2011) J Sch Pub , vol.42 , pp. 243-61
    • Ardakan, M.A.1    Mirzaie, S.A.2    Sheikhshoaei, F.3
  • 2
    • 77958600205 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Editors as gatekeepers of responsible science
    • Marušic A. Editors as gatekeepers of responsible science. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2010; 20: 282-7.
    • (2010) Biochem Med (Zagreb) , vol.20 , pp. 282-7
    • Marušic, A.1
  • 3
    • 77956091341 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Biomedical Journals in India: some critical concerns
    • Satyanarayana K, Sharma A. Biomedical Journals in India: some critical concerns. Indian J Med Res 2010; 132: 119-22.
    • (2010) Indian J Med Res , vol.132 , pp. 119-22
    • Satyanarayana, K.1    Sharma, A.2
  • 5
    • 83455180020 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Combining science editors' and clinicians' efforts to advance writing and editing skills
    • Gasparyan AY. Combining science editors' and clinicians' efforts to advance writing and editing skills. Eur Sci Ed 2011; 37: 102-3.
    • (2011) Eur Sci Ed , vol.37 , pp. 102-3
    • Gasparyan, A.Y.1
  • 6
    • 84871295705 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The importance of medical case reports
    • Salager-Meyer F. The importance of medical case reports. Eur Sci Ed 2012; 38: 38-9.
    • (2012) Eur Sci Ed , vol.38 , pp. 38-9
    • Salager-Meyer, F.1
  • 8
    • 79960920337 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving peer review in scholarly journals
    • Bornmann L, Mungra P. Improving peer review in scholarly journals. Eur Sci Ed 2011; 37: 41-3.
    • (2011) Eur Sci Ed , vol.37 , pp. 41-3
    • Bornmann, L.1    Mungra, P.2
  • 9
    • 83555166113 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
    • Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int 2011; 31: 1409-17.
    • (2011) Rheumatol Int , vol.31 , pp. 1409-17
    • Gasparyan, A.Y.1    Ayvazyan, L.2    Blackmore, H.3    Kitas, G.D.4
  • 10
    • 78650326428 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Enhancing the Quality of Research Publication: AuthorAID in the Eastern Mediterranean
    • Shashok K, Handjani F. Enhancing the Quality of Research Publication: AuthorAID in the Eastern Mediterranean. J Tehran Heart Cent 2010; 5: 169-71.
    • (2010) J Tehran Heart Cent , vol.5 , pp. 169-71
    • Shashok, K.1    Handjani, F.2
  • 11
    • 84870268284 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An adaptable model of electronic editorial services for medical universities
    • Barroga EF, Turner RJ, Breugelmans R, Barron JP. An adaptable model of electronic editorial services for medical universities. Eur Sci Ed 2012; 38: 32-5.
    • (2012) Eur Sci Ed , vol.38 , pp. 32-5
    • Barroga, E.F.1    Turner, R.J.2    Breugelmans, R.3    Barron, J.P.4
  • 12
    • 18844446650 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal
    • Marusic M, Sambunjak D, Marusic A. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal. Croat Med J 2005; 46: 326-32.
    • (2005) Croat Med J , vol.46 , pp. 326-32
    • Marusic, M.1    Sambunjak, D.2    Marusic, A.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.