Decomposition analysis and Innovative Accounting Approach for energy-related CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions intensity over 1996-2009 in Portugal

Energy

Volumn 57, Issue , 2013, Pages 775-787

  Robaina Alves, Margarita ^a   Moutinho, Victor ^b,c  

^a Campus Universitário de Santiago   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Decomposition analysis; Impulse response functions; Manufacturing industry; Portugal; Variance decomposition

Indexed keywords

ENERGY UTILIZATION; FOSSIL FUELS; INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS;

DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; EMISSIONS INTENSITY; IMPULSE RESPONSE FUNCTIONS; MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES; PORTUGAL; VARIANCE DECOMPOSITION;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; DECOMPOSITION; FOSSIL FUEL; FUEL CONSUMPTION; INDUSTRIAL EMISSION; MANUFACTURING; TEMPORAL PERIOD; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

PORTUGAL;

EID: 84880699407     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.036     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alcantara V., Duro J.A. Inequality of energy intensities across OECD countries: a note. Energy Policy 2004, 32(11):1257-1260.
2. Duro J.A., Alcántara V., Padilla E. International inequality in energy intensity levels and the role of production composition and energy efficiency: an analysis of OECD countries. Ecological Economics 2010, 69(12):2468-2474.
3. Sun J.W. The decrease in the difference of energy intensities between OECD countries from 1971 to 1998. Energy Policy 2002, 30(8):631-635.
4. Mendiluce M., Pérez-Arriaga I., Ocaña C. Comparison of the evolution of energy intensity in Spain and in the EU15. Why is Spain different?. Energy Policy 2010, 38(1):639-645.
5. Douglas S., Nishioka S. International differences in emissions intensity and emissions content of global trade. Journal of Development Economics 2012, 99(2):415-427.
6. Greening L.A., Davis W.B., Schipper L. Decomposition of aggregate carbon intensityfor the manufacturing sector: comparison of declining trends from 10 OECD countries for the period 1971-1991. Energy Economics 1998, 20(1):43-65.
7. Fan Y., Liu L.C., Wu G., Tsai H.T., Wei Y.M. Changes in carbon intensity in China: empirical findings from 1980-2003. Ecological Economics 2007, 62(3-4):683-691.
8. Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente. Portuguese national inventory report on greenhouse gases 1990-2009. In: Protocol SutUNFCoCCatK, editor. 2011.
9. 2 emissions in the EU manufacturing sector. Energy Economics 2007, 29(4):636-664.
10. Sun J.W. Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: a complete decomposition model. Energy Economics 1998, 20(1):85-100.
11. 2 emission over 1991-2006 in China. Ecological Economics 2009, 68(7):2122-2128.
12. 2 emissions in manufacturing. Energy Economics 1997, 19(3):363-374.
13. Sun J.W. Accounting for energy use in China, 1980-94. Energy 1998, 23(10):835-849.
14. Ang B.W., Zhang F.Q. Asurvey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies. Energy 2000, 25(12):1149-1176.
15. Choi K.H., Ang B.W. Atime-series analysis of energy-related carbon emissions in Korea. Energy Policy 2001, 29(13):1155-1161.
16. Choi K.H., Ang B.W. Measuring thermal efficiency improvement in power generation: the Divisia decomposition approach. Energy 2002, 27(5):447-455.
17. 2 emission from energy use in India: a decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 2004, 32(5):585-593.
18. Lu I.J., Lin S.J., Lewis C. Decomposition and decoupling effects of carbon dioxide emission from highway transportation in Taiwan, Germany, Japan and South Korea. Energy Policy 2007, 35(6):3226-3235.
19. Wang W.C., Mu H.L., Kang X.D., Song R.C., Ning Y.D. Changes in industrial electricity consumption in china from 1998 to 2007. Energy Policy 2010, 38(7):3684-3690.
20. 2 emissions from energy consumption in South Korea. Energy Policy 2010, 38(1):364-377.
21. 2 emissions of Turkish manufacturing industry: a decomposition analysis. Applied Energy 2011, 88(6):2273-2278.
22. 2 emissions in Mexican manufacturing industries: trends between 1990 and 2008. Energy for Sustainable Development 2012, 16(1):57-67.
23. Hoekstra R., van der Bergh J.J.C.J.M. Comparing structural and index decomposition analysis. Energy Economics 2003, 25(1):39-64.
24. Rose A., Casler S. Input-output structural decomposition analysis: a critical appraisal. Economic Systems Research 1996, 8(1):33-62.
25. 2 emissions using the decomposition technique. Energy 1999, 24(4):297-305.
26. 2 emission in China: 1957-2000. Energy 2005, 30(1):73-83.
27. 2 emissions from 1996 to 1999: the relative importance of structural change, intensity change and scale change. Energy Policy 2005, 33(3):319-335.
28. 2 emissions in APEC countries: a time-series and a cross-sectional decomposition using the log mean Divisia method. Energy Policy 2006, 34(17):2779-2787.
29. 2 emissions over 1980-2003 in Turkey. Energy Policy 2006, 34(14):1841-1852.
30. 2 emissions from final fuel use: an empirical analysis. Energy Policy 2007, 35(11):5892-5900.
31. Ma C., Stern D.I. China's changing energy intensity trend: a decomposition analysis. Energy Economics 2008, 30(3):1037-1053.
32. Zhang F.Q., Ang B.W. Methodological issues in cross-country/region decomposition of energy and environment indicators. Energy Economics 2001, 23(2):179-190.
33. 2 emissions: the case of European Union. Energy Economics 2000, 22(4):383-394.
34. 2 emission intensity comparable?. Energy Policy 2000, 28(15):1081-1084.
35. Sun J.W. Energy demand in the fifteen European Union countries by 2010 - a forecasting model based on the decomposition approach. Energy 2001, 26(6):549-560.
36. Bhattacharyya S.C., Matsumura W. Changes in the GHG emission intensity in EU-15: lessons from a decomposition analysis. Energy 2010, 35(8):3315-3322.
37. 2 emissions in Ireland: a multi-sectoral decomposition from 1990 to 2007. Energy Policy 2012, 44:256-267.
38. Huang J.P. Industry energy use and structural-change - a case-study of the Peoples-Republic-of-China. Energy Economics 1993, 15(2):131-136.
39. Sinton J.E., Levine M.D. Changing energy intensity in Chinese industry - the relative importance of structural shift and intensity change. Energy Policy 1994, 22(3):239-255.
40. Miketa A. Analysis of energy intensity developments in manufacturing sectors in industrialized and developing countries. Energy Policy 2001, 29(10):769-775.
41. Hamilton C., Turton H. Determinants of emissions growth in OECD countries. Energy Policy 2002, 30(1):63-71.
42. Zhang Z.X. Why did the energy intensity fall in China's industrial sector in the 1990s? The relative importance of structural change and intensity change. Energy Economics 2003, 25(6):625-638.
43. Liao H., Fan Y., Wei Y.M. What induced China's energy intensity to fluctuate: 1997-2006?. Energy Policy 2007, 35(9):4640-4649.
44. Zhao M., Tan L.R., Zhang W.G., Ji M.H., Liu Y.A., Yu L.Z. Decomposing the influencing factors of industrial carbon emissions in Shanghai using the LMDI method. Energy 2010, 35(6):2505-2510.
45. 2 emissions for1990-2020: a decomposition analysis for EU-25 and Greece. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 2010, 32(20):1908-1917.
46. Zhang X.P., Cheng X.M. Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecological Economics 2009, 68(10):2706-2712.
47. Lee C.C., Chien M.S. Dynamic modelling of energy consumption, capital stock, and real income in G-7 countries. Energy Economics 2010, 32(3):564-581.
48. 2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US. Energy Policy 2010, 38(6):2911-2915.
49. 2 emissions and economic growth in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011, 15(6):3243-3251.
50. Lee C.C., Chiu Y.B. Nuclear energy consumption, oil prices, and economic growth: evidence from highly industrialized countries. Energy Economics 2011, 33(2):236-248.