Positive versus normative justifications for benefit-cost analysis: Implications for interpretation and policy

Review of Environmental Economics and Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 199-218

  Hammitt, James K ^a,b  

^a HARVARD CENTER FOR RISK ANALYSIS   (United States)

^b TOULOUSE SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; POLICY MAKING;

EID: 84880689016     PISSN: 17506816     EISSN: 17506824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/reep/ret009     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Adler, M. A., and E. A. Posner. 2006. New foundations for benefit-cost analysis. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Alberini, A., M. Cropper, A. Krupnick, and N. Simon. 2004. Does the value of a statistical life vary with age and health status? Evidence from the U.S. and Canada. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48: 769-92.
3. Allais, M. 1953. Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l'école américaine". Econometrica 21: 503-46.
4. Allcott, H. 2010. Consumers' Perceptions and misperceptions of energy costs. American Economic Review 101: 98-104.
5. Angeletos, G.-M., D. Laibson, A. Repetto, J. Tobacman, and S. Weinberg. 2001. The hyperbolic consumption model: Calibration, simulation, and empirical evaluation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15: 47-68.
6. Arrow, K. J., M. L. Cropper, G. C. Eads, R.W. Hahn, L. B. Lave, R. G. Noll, P. R. Portney, M. Russell, R. Schmalensee, V. K. Smith, and R. N. Stavins. 1996. Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation?" Science 272: 221-22.
7. Bernheim, B. D., and A. Rangel. 2009. Beyond revealed preference: Choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124: 51-104.
8. Beshears, J., J. J. Choi, D. Laibson, and B. C. Madrian. 2008. How are preferences revealed? Journal of Public Economics 92: 1787-94.
9. Binmore, K. 2009. Rational decisions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Bleichrodt, H., and L. Eeckhoudt. 2006. Willingness to pay for reductions in health risks when probabilities are distorted. Health Economics 15: 211-14.
11. Bleichrodt, H., J. L. Pinto, and P. P. Wakker. 2001. Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility. Management Science 47: 1498-1514.
12. Boardman, A., D. Greenberg, A. Vining, and D. Weimer. 2006. Cost benefit analysis: Concepts and practice. New York: Prentice Hall.
13. Burke, E. 1996. Speech at the conclusion of the poll, November 3, 1774. In The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, ed.W.M. Elofson, and J. A. Woods. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
14. Chernobyl Forum. 2003-5. Chernobyl's legacy: Health, environmental and socio-economic impacts, 2nd rev. ed. http://www.iaea.org/Publications/ Booklets/Chernobyl/chernobyl.pdf (accessed May 21, 2013).
15. Cline, W. R. 1992. The economics of global warming. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
16. Cohen, M., and J.-Y. Jaffray. 1988. Is Savage's independence axiom a universal rationality principle?" Behavioral Science 33: 38-47.
17. Corso, P. S., J. K. Hammitt, and J. D. Graham. 2001. Valuing mortality-risk reduction: Using visual aids to improve the validity of contingent valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 23: 165-84.
18. Cropper, M. L., and F. G. Sussman. 1990. Valuing future risks to life. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19: 160-74.
19. Diamond, P. A., and J. A. Hausman. 1994. Contingent valuation: When is some number better than no number?" Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 45-64.
20. Downs, A. 1957. An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy 65: 135-50.
21. Ellsberg, D. 1961. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 643-69.
22. Fann, N., A. D. Lamson, S. C. Anenberg, K. Wesson, D. Risley, and B. J. Hubbell. 2012. Estimating the national public health burden associated with exposure to ambient PM25 and ozone. Risk Analysis 32: 81-95.
23. Frederick, S., G. Loewenstein, and T. O'Donohue. 2002. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature 40: 351-401.
24. Gately, D. 1980. Individual discount rates and the purchase and utilization of energy-using durables: Comment. Bell Journal of Economics 11: 373-74.
25. Gneezy, U., J. A. List, and G.Wu. 2006. The uncertainty effect: When a risky prospect is valued less than its worst possible outcome. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121: 1283-1309.
26. Gollier, C. 2012. Pricing the planet's future: The economics of discounting in an uncertain world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27. Gollier, C., andM. L.Weitzman. 2010. How Should the distant future be discounted when discount rates are uncertain?" Economics Letters 107: 350-53.
28. Gowdy, J. M. 2007. Toward an experimental foundation for benefit-cost analysis. Ecological Economics 63: 649-655.
29. Gravelle, H., and D. S. Smith. 2001. Discounting for health effects in cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Economics 10: 587-99.
30. Hammitt, J. K. 2002. QALYs versus WTP. Risk Analysis 22: 985-1001.
31. Hammitt, J. K., and J. D. Graham. 1999. Willingness to pay for health protection: Inadequate sensitivity to probability?" Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 18: 33-62.
32. Hammitt, J. K., and K. Haninger. 2010. Valuing fatal risks to children and adults: Effects of disease, latency, and risk aversion. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 40: 57-83.
33. Hanemann, W. M. 1991. "Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?" American Economic Review 81: 635-647; 1991.
34. Hanemann, W. M. 1994. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 19-43.
35. Haninger, K., and J. K. Hammitt. 2011. Diminishing willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year: valuing acute foodborne illness. Risk Analysis 31: 1363-80.
36. Hausman, J. A. 1979. Individual discount rates and the purchase and utilization of energy-using durables. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 33-54.
37. Hausman, J. A. 2012. Contingent valuation: From dubious to hopeless. Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4): 43-56.
38. Hausman, J. A., and P. L. Joskow. 1982. Evaluating the costs and benefits of appliance efficiency standards. American Economic Review 72: 220-25.
39. Horowitz, J. K., and K. E. McConnell. 2002. A review of WTA/WTP studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44: 426-47.
40. Isoni, A., G. Loomes, and R. Sugden. 2011. The willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap, the "endowment effect," subject misconceptions, and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations: Comment. American Economic Review 101: 991-1011.
41. Jaffe, A. B., and R. N. Stavins. 1994. The energy efficiency gap: What does it mean? Energy Policy 22: 804-10.
42. Jefferson, T. 1854. Letter to Mr. Jarvis, September 28, 1820. In The writings of Thomas Jefferson, ed. H. A.Washington. New York: H.W. Derby.
43. Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch, and R. H. Thaler. 1990. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy 98: 1325-48.
44. Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, eds. 1982. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. Kahneman, D., and R. Sugden. 2005. Experienced utility as a standard of policy evaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics 32: 161-81.
46. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: 263-91.
47. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. eds. 2000. Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48. Kling, C. L., D. J. Phaneuf, and J. Zhao. 2012. From Exxon to BP: Has some number become better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4): 3-26.
49. Knetsch, J. L. 2010. Values of gains and losses: Reference states and choice of measure. Environmental and Resource Economics 46: 179-88.
50. Knetsch, J. L., and J. A. Sinden. 1984. Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: Experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. Quarterly Journal of Economics 99: 507-21.
51. Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
52. Koopmans, T. C. 1960. Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28: 287-309.
53. Larrick, R. P., and J. B. Soll. 2008. The MPG illusion. Science 320 (5883): 1593-94.
54. List, J. A. 2003. Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 41-71.
55. List, J. A. 2004. Substitutability, experience, and the value disparity: evidence from the marketplace. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47: 486-509.
56. Machina, M. J. 1987. Choice under uncertainty: Problems solved and unsolved. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1: 121-54.
57. Manski, C. F. 2011. Actualist rationality. Theory and Decision 71: 195-210.
58. National Research Council. 2010. Hidden costs of energy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
59. Nichols, A. L., and R. J. Zeckhauser. 1988. The perils of prudence: How conservative risk assessments distort regulation. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 8: 61-75.
60. Nordhaus, W. D. 1994. Managing the global commons: The economics of climate change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Nordhaus, W. D. 2007. A review of the Stern review on the economics of global warming. Journal of Economic Literature 45: 686-702.
62. Nyborg, K. 2012. The ethics and politics of environmental cost-benefit analysis. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge.
63. Okun, A. M. 1975. Equality and efficiency: The big tradeoff. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
64. Peltzman, S. 1975. The effects of automobile safety regulation. Journal of Political Economy 83: 677-726.
65. Plott, C. R., and K. Zeiler. 2005. The willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap, the "endowment effect," subject misconceptions, and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations. American Economic Review 95: 530-45.
66. Portney, P. R. 1992. Trouble in Happyville. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 11: 131-32.
67. Putler, D. S. 1992. Incorporating reference price effects into a theory of consumer choice. Marking Science 11: 287-309.
68. Quiggin, J. 1993. Generalized expected utility theory: The rank-dependent model. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
69. Ramsey, F. P. 1928. A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal 38: 543-59.
70. Robinson, L. A., and J. K. Hammitt. 2011a. Behavioral economics and the conduct of benefit- cost analysis: Towards principles and standards. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 2 (2). Article 5.
71. Robinson, L. A., and J. K. Hammitt. 2011b. Behavioral economics and regulatory analysis. Risk Analysis 31 (9): 1408-22.
72. Saint-Paul, G. 2011. The tyranny of utility: Behavioral social science and the rise of paternalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73. Samuelson, P. 1937. A note on measurement of utility. Review of Economic Studies 4: 155-61.
74. Savage, L. J. 1954. The foundations of statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
75. Sen, A. 1992. Inequality reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
76. Slovic, P. 1987. Perception of risk. Science 236 (4799): 280-85.
77. Slovic, P. 2000. The perception of risk. London: Earthscan.
78. Slovic, P., and A. Tversky. 1974. Who accepts Savage's axiom? Behavioral Science 19: 308-73.
79. Smith, V. K., and E. M. Moore. 2010. Behavioral economics and benefit cost analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics 46: 217-34.
80. Starr, C. 1969. Social benefit versus technological risk: What is our society willing to pay for safety? Science 165: 1232-38.
81. Stern, N. 2007. The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82. Sterner, T., and U. M. Persson. 2008. An even Sterner review: Introducing relative prices into the discounting debate. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2: 61-76.
83. Sugden, R. 2004. The opportunity criterion: Consumer sovereignty without the assumption of coherent preferences. American Economic Review 94: 1014-33.
84. Sugden, R. 2005. Coping with preference anomalies in cost-benefit analysis: A market-simulation approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 32: 129-60.
85. Sugden, R. 2011. The behavioural economist and the social planner: To whom should behavioural welfare economics be addressed? Papers on Economics and Evolution #1121, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany, December 20.
86. Sunstein, C. R. 2000. Cognition and benefit-cost analysis. Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2): 1059-1103.
87. Sunstein, C. R. 2002. Probability neglect: Emotions, worst cases, and law. Yale Law Journal 112: 61-107.
88. Sunstein, C., and R. J. Zeckhauser. 2011. Overreaction to fearsome risks. Environmental and Resource Economics 48: 435-49.
89. Thaler, R. H. 1999. Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12: 183-206.
90. Tsao, J. D., H. D. Saunders, J. R. Creighton, M. E. Coltrin, and J. A. Simmons. 2010. Solid-state lighting: An energy-economics perspective. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 43: 354001.
91. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124-31.
92. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1991. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 1039-61.
93. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1992. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5: 297-323.
94. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2011. The benefits and costs of the Clean Air Act from 1990 to 2020. Washington, DC: USEPA.
95. US Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 2003. Circular A-4: Regulatory analysis. Washington, DC: OMB.
96. Viscusi, W. K. 1985. A Bayesian perspective on biases in risk perception. Economic Letters 17: 59-62.
97. Viscusi, W. K. 1989. Prospective reference theory: Toward an explanation of the paradoxes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2: 235-63.
98. Viscusi, W. K. 2009. The devaluation of life. Regulation and Governance 3: 103-27.
99. von Hippel, F. N. 2011. The radiological and psychological consequences of the Fukushima Daiichi accident. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 67 (5): 27-36.
100. Wiener, J. B. 1997. Risk in the republic. Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum 8: 1-21