Promoting socialization of schoolchildren using a teleoperated android: An interaction study

International Journal of Humanoid Robotics

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Yamazaki, Ryuji ^a,c   Nishio, Shuichi ^a   Ogawa, Kohei ^a,b   Matsumura, Kohei ^c   Minato, Takashi ^a   Ishiguro, Hiroshi ^a,b   Fujinami, Tsutomu ^c   Nishikawa, Masaru ^b  

^a ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c JAPAN ADVANCED INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

android robot; cooperation; embodied communication; inter generational relationship; minimal design; role differentiation; socialization; Telecommunication; teleoperation

Indexed keywords

COOPERATION; EMBODIED COMMUNICATION; INTER-GENERATIONAL RELATIONSHIP; MINIMAL DESIGNS; ROLE DIFFERENTIATIONS; SOCIALIZATION;

COMMUNICATION; MACHINE DESIGN; REMOTE CONTROL; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SOCIAL SCIENCES; TELECOMMUNICATION;

ROBOTS;

EID: 84880687390     PISSN: 02198436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219843613500072     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. R. Yamazaki, S. Nishio, K. Ogawa, H. Ishiguro, K. Matsumura, K. Koda and T. Fujinami, How does Telenoid affect the communication between children in classroom setting?, CHI'12 Ext. Abst. (2012) 351-366.
2. J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, 1991).
3. L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society (Harvard University Press, 1978).
4. A. Green, H. Huttenrauch and K. S. Eklundh, Applying the Wizard-of-Oz framework to cooperative service discovery and configuration, Proc. 13th IEEE Int. Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2004), pp. 575-580.
5. M. L. Walters, K. Dautenhahn, R. Boekhorst, K. L. Koay, C. Kaouri, S. Woods, C. Nehaniv, D. Lee and I. Werry, The inůence of participants' personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment. IEEE Int. Workshop on Robot and Human Communication (2005), pp. 347-352.
6. S. Woods, M. Walters, K. L. Koay and K. Dautenhahn, Comparing human robot interaction scenarios using live and video based methods: Towards a novel methodological approach, Proc. 9th Int. Workshop on Advanced Motion Control (2006), pp. 750-755.
7. A. J. Sellen, Speech patterns in video-mediated conversations, Proc. CHI'92 (1992), pp. 49-59.
8. W. Buxton, Living in augmented reality: Ubiquitous media and reactive environments, in Video Mediated Communication, eds. K. Finn, A. Sellen and S. Wilber (1997), pp. 363-384.
9. L. E. Fahlén, C. G. Brown, O. Stahl and C. Carlsson, A space based model for user interaction in shared synthetic environments, Proc. INTERCHI 1993 (1993), pp. 43-48.
10. O. Morikawa, The sense of togetherness in hyperMirror: An explanation using cognitive modes, Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Artificial Reality and Telexistence, ICAT 2004 (2004), pp. 584-587.
11. M. K. Lee and L. Takayama, Now, I have a body: Uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace, Proc. CHI'11 (2011), pp. 33-42.
12. J. Hollan and S. Stornetta, Beyond being there, Proc. CHI'92 (1992), pp. 119-125.
13. F. Tanaka, A. Cicourel and J. R. Movellan, Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center, Proc. The National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. Vol. 104, No. 46 (2007), pp. 17954-17958.
14. T. Kanda, S. Nishio, H. Ishiguro and N. Hagita. Interactive Humanoid Robots and Androids in Children's Lives, Children, Youth and Environments 19(1) (2009) 12-33.
15. M. A. Goodrich and A. C. Schultz, Human-robot interaction: A survey. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 1(3) (2007) 203-275.
16. J. Han, Robot-aided learning and r-learning services, in Human-Robot Interaction, ed. D. Chugo I-Tech (2010), pp. 247-266.
17. D. I. Fels, and P. L. T. Weiss, Video-mediated communication in the classroom to support sick children: A case study, Int. J. Industrial Ergonomics 28(5) (2001) 251-263.
18. H. Ishiguro, Android science: Toward a new cross-disciplinary framework, Proc. Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science, A CogSci 2005 Workshop (2005), pp. 1-6.
19. T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh and K. Dautenhahn, A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics Autonomous Syst. 42 (2003) 143-166.
20. T. Minato, M. Shimada, H. Ishiguro and S. Itakura, Development of an android robot for studying human-robot interaction, Proc. The 17th International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems (2004), pp. 424-434.
21. S. Nishio, H. Ishiguro and N. Hagita, Can a teleoperated android represent personal presence?: A case study with children, Psychologia 50(4) (2007) 330-342.
22. K. Ogawa, S. Nishio, K. Koda, G. Balistreri, T. Watanabe and H. Ishiguro, Exploring the natural reaction of young and aged person with Telenoid in a real world, J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. 15(5) (2011) 592-597.
23. T. Tamura, S. Yonemitsu, A. Itoh, D. Oikawa, A. Kawakami, Y. Higashi, T. Fujimooto and K. Nakajima, Is an entertainment robot useful in the care of elderly people with severe dementia?, J. Gerontol. Med. Sci. 59A(1) (2004) 83-85.
24. M. Heerink, B. Kröse, V. Evers and B. Wielinga, The inůence of a robot's social abilities on acceptance by elderly users, Proc. RO-MAN'06 (2006), pp. 521-526.
25. W. D. Stiehl, J. Lieberman, C. Breazeal, L. Basel, R. Cooper, H. Knight, L. Lalla, A. Maymin and S. Purchase, The huggable: A therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch, Proc. The 3rd Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (2006), pp. 1290-1291.
26. D. Lee, T. Yamazaki and S. Helal, Robotic companions for smart space interaction, Pervasive Comput. (2009) 78-84.
27. K. Wada and T. Shibata, Robot therapy in a care house: Results of case studies, Proc. The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2006), pp. 581-586.
28. M. Mori, Bukimi no tani [The uncanny valley], Energy 7(4) (1970) 33-35 (in Japanese).
29. S. Nishio, H. Ishiguro and N. Hagita, Geminoid: Teleoperated android of an existing person, Humanoid Robots, New Developments 20 (2007) 343-352.
30. D. Sekiguchi, M. Inami and S. Tachi, Robot-PHONE: RUI for interpersonal communication, CHI'01 Ext. Abst. (2001) 277-278.
31. R. Yamazaki, S. Nishio, K. Ogawa and H. Ishiguro, Teleoperated android as an embodied communication medium: A case study with demented elderlies in a care facility, Proc. RO-MAN'12 (2012), pp. 1066-1071.
32. D. Sperber and D. Wilson, Relevance: Communication and Cognition (Harvard University Press, 1986). Technology