Adaptive goal recognition

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2, Issue , 1997, Pages 1208-1214

  Lesh, Neal ^a  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION SEQUENCES; HILL CLIMBING; INPUT SET; TWO DOMAINS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84880661450     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. P. Agre and I. Horswill. Cultural support for improvisation. In Proc. 10th Nat. Conf, on Al, pp. 363-368, 1992.
2. L. Ardissono and R. Cohen. On the value of user modeling for improving plan recognition. In Proceedings of the workshop on The Next Generation of Plan Recognition Systems: Challenges for and Insight from Related Areas of AI, pp. 8-12, August 1995.
3. Liliana Ardissono. Dynamic User Modeling and Plan Recognition in Dialogue. PhD thesis, Department of Information, University of Torino, Italy, 1996.
4. M. Bauer. Quantitative modeling of user preferences for plan recognition. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on User Modeling, pp. 73-78, 1994.
5. M. Bauer. Acquisition of user preferences for plan recognition. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on User Modeling, pp. 105-112, January 1996.
6. S. Carberry. Incorporating default inferences into plan recognition. In Proc. 8th Nat. Conf. on AI, vol. 1, pp. 471-8, July 1990.
7. Rich Caruana and Dayne Freitag. Greedy attribute selection. In Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, pp. 28-36, 1994.
8. D. Chapman. Planning for conjunctive goals. Artificial Intelligence, 32(3):333-377, 1987.
9. Stephanie Elzer, Jennifer Chu-Carroll, and Saundra Carberry. Recognizing and utilizing user preferences in collaborative consultation dialogues. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on User Modeling, pp. 19-24, 1994.
10. R. Fikes and N. Nilsson. STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 2(3/4), 1971.
11. J.R. Hobbs, M. Stickel, P. Martin, and D. Edwards. Interpretation as abduction. In Proc. of Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 32-37, 1988.
12. H. Kautz. A Formal Theory Of Plan Recognition. PhD thesis, University of Rochester, 1987.
13. Neal Lesh and Oren Etzioni. A sound and fast goal recognizer. In Proc. 14th Int. Joint Conf. on Al pp. 1704-1710, 1995.
14. Neal Lesh and Oren Etzioni. Scaling up goal recognition. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 178-189, 1996.
15. Pattie Maes and Robyn Kozierok. Learning interface agents. In Proceedings of AAAI-93, 1993.
16. Tom Mitchell, Rich Caruana, Dayne Freitag, John McDermott, and David Zabowski. Experience with a learning personal assistant. C. ACM, 37(7):81-91, 1994.
17. Raymond J. Mooney. Learning Plan Schemata From Observation: Explanation-Based Learning for Plan Recognition. Cognitive Science, pp. 483-509, 1990.
18. M. Pollack. Plans as complex mental attitudes. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. Pollack, eds., Intentions in Communication, pp. 77-101. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
19. D.V. Pynadath and M.P. Wellman. Accounting for context in plan recognition, with application to traffic monitoring. In Proc. 11th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artifical Intelligence, pp. 472-81, August 1995.
20. S. G. Soderland. Learning Text Analysis Rules for Domain-Specific natural language processing. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, 1997.