The representation and use of a visual lexicon for automated graphics generation

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2, Issue , 1997, Pages 1056-1062

  Zhou, Michelle X ^a   Feiner, Steven K ^a  

^a Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING BLOCKES; CONSTRUCTIVE APPROACH; GENERATION PROCESS; GENERATION SYSTEMS; LEXICAL ITEMS; VISUAL OBJECTS; VISUAL PRESENTATION; VISUAL VARIABLES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 84880654758     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Arens, Y., Hovy, E., and Vossers, M. (1993). The knowledge underlying multimedia presentations. In Maybury, M., editor, Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces, chapter 12, pages 280-306. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA.
2. Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of Graphics. Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI. (trans, by W.J. Berg).
3. Casner, S. (1991). A task-analytic approach to the automated design of graphic presentations. ACM Trans, on Graphics, \0(2):\ 11-151.
4. Cohen, P. and Feigenbaum, E., editors (1989). The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, volume 3, chapter XV. Planning and Problem Solving. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
5. Elhadad, M., McKeown, K., and Robin, J. (1997). Floating constraints in lexical choice. J. of Computational Linguistics. To appear.
6. Gates, D., McCardell, R., Takeda, K., and Nirenburg, S. (1991). Generation lexicons. In Goodman, K. and Nirenburg, S., editors, A Case Study in Knowledge-Based Machine Translation, chapter 6, pages 145-163. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.
7. Gnanamgari, S. (1981). Information Presentation Through Automatic Graphic Displays. PhD thesis, Univ. of Penn.
8. Goldsmith, E. (1984). Research Into Illustration: An Approach and A Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Lohse, G., Biolsi, K., and Rueter, H. (1994). A classification of visual representations. Communications of the ACM, 37(12):36-49.
10. Mackinlay, J. (1986). Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM Trans, on Graphics, 5(2): 110-141.
11. Marks, J. (1991). A formal specification scheme for network diagrams that facilitates automated design. J. of Visual Languages and Computing, 2(4):395-414.
12. Robertson, P. (1991). A methodology for choosing data representations. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, II(3):56-67.
13. Roth, S. F. and Mattis, J. (1991). Automating the presentation of information. In Proc. IEEE Conf on AI Applications, pages 90-97,
14. Russell, S. and Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632.
15. Senay, H. and Ignatius, E. (1994). A knowledge-based system for visualization design. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 14(6):36-47.
16. Wernecke, J. (1994). The Inventor Mentor: Programming Object-Oriented 3D graphics with Open Inventor. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
17. Zhou, M. and Feiner, S. (1996). Data characterization for automatically visualizing heterogeneous information. In Proc. IEEEInfoVis'96, pages 13-20, San Francisco, CA.
18. Zhou, M. and Feiner, S. (1997). Top-down hierarchical planning of coherent visual discourse. In Proc. IUI'97, pages 129-136, Orlando, FL.