A network generalized extreme value model for route choice allowing implicit route enumeration

Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 560-580

  Papola, Andrea ^a   Marzano, Vittorio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLOSED-FORM MODELS; ENUMERATION ALGORITHMS; GENERALIZED EXTREME VALUE; ITS APPLICATIONS; PROBABILITY STATEMENTS; REAL-SIZE NETWORKS; ROUTE CHOICE MODEL; STOCHASTIC NETWORKS;

CIVIL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER APPLICATIONS;

ALGORITHMS;

ALGORITHM; COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; NETWORK ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; STOCHASTICITY; TESTING METHOD;

EID: 84880632663     PISSN: 10939687     EISSN: 14678667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/mice.12007     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bekhor, S., Ben-Akiva, M. & Ramming, M. S. (2002), Adaptation of logit kernel to route choice situations, Transportation Research Record, 1805, 78-85.
2. Bekhor, S., Toledo, T. & Reznikova, L. (2009), A path-based algorithm for the Cross Nested Logit stochastic user equilibrium traffic assignment, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24(1), 15-25.
3. Ben-Akiva, M. & Bierlaire, M. (1999), Discrete choice models with applications to departure time and route choice, Handbook of Transportation Science, 26, 5-34.
4. Ben-Akiva, M. & Bolduc, D. (1996), Multinomial Probit with a Logit Kernel and General Parametric Specification of the Covariance Structure, Working Paper, Département d'économique, Université Laval.
5. Ben-Akiva, M. & Lerman, S. (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Ben-Akiva, M. & Ramming, S. (1998), Lecture notes: discrete choice models of traveler behavior in networks. Prepared for Advanced Methods for Planning and Management of Transportation Networks, Capri, Italy.
7. Bierlaire, M. (2001), A general formulation of the Cross-Nested Logit model, in Proceedings of the First Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland.
8. Bierlaire, M. & Frejinger, E. (2005), Route choice models with subpath components, in Proceedings of STRC 2005 Conference, Ascona, Switzerland.
9. Bovy, P. H. L., Bekhor, S. & Prato, C. G. (2009), The factor of revisited path size: alternative derivation, Transportation Research Record, 2076, 132-40.
10. Cascetta, E. & Papola, A. (2001), Random utility models with implicit availability/perception of choice alternatives for the simulation of travel demand, Transportation Research C, 9(6), 249-63.
11. Cascetta, E., Nuzzolo, A., Russo, F. & Vitetta, A. (1996), A modified Logit route choice model overcoming path overlapping problems. Specification and some calibration results for interurban networks, in Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Jean-Baptiste Lesort (ed.), Pergamon.
12. Chen, A., Kasikitwiwat, P. & Ji, Z. (2003), Solving the overlapping problem in route choice using Paired Combinatorial Logit model, in Proceedings of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
13. Chu, C. (1989), A Paired Combinatorial Logit model for travel demand analysis, in Proceedings of 5th World Conference on Transportation Research, Ventura, CA.
14. Daganzo, C. F. & Sheffi, Y. (1977), On stochastic models of traffic assignment, Transportation Science, 11(3), 253-74.
15. Daly, A. & Bierlaire, M. (2006), A general and operational representation of GEV models, Transportation Research B, 40, 285-305.
16. Dial, R. B. (1971), A probabilistic multipath traffic assignment model which obviates path enumeration. Transportation Research, 5, 83-111.
17. Fosgerau, M., Frejinger, E. & Karlstr, A. (2011), Consistent route choice model estimation without choice set sampling: a dynamic discrete choice approach, European Transport Conference (ETC), Glasgow, UK.
18. Frejinger, E. & Bierlaire, M. (2007), Capturing correlation with subnetworks in route choice models, Transportation Research B, 40, 363-78.
19. Gliebe, J. P., Koppelman, F. S. & Ziliaskopoulos, A. (1999), Route choice using a Paired Combinatorial Logit model, in Proceedings of the 78th Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
20. Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., van Nes, R. & Bovy, P. (2005), Path-size and overlap in multimodal networks, in Proceedings of 16th ISTTT Conference, College Park, MD.
21. Marzano, V. (2006), Sviluppi teorici sui modelli di simulazione della scelta del percorso. Ph.D. dissertation, Università di Napoli Federico II (in Italian).
22. Marzano, V. & Papola, A. (2008), On the covariance structure of the Cross Nested Logit model, Transportation Research B, 42(2), 83-98.
23. McFadden, D. (1978), Modelling the choice of residential location, in A. Karlqvist, et al. (eds.), Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, North Holland, Amsterdam.
24. Meng, Q. & Wang, X. (2008), Sensitivity analysis of logit-based stochastic user equilibrium network flows with entry-exit toll schemes, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 23(2), 138-256.
25. Newman, J. (2008), Normalization of network generalized extreme value models, Transportation Research Part B, 42(10), 958-69.
26. Ng, M. W. & Waller, S. T. (2012), A dynamic route choice model considering uncertain capacities, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27(4), 231-43.
27. Papola, A. (2000), Some developments of the Cross-Nested Logit model, in Proceedings of the 9th IATBR Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
28. Papola, A. (2003), Applicabilit del modello Link Nested Logit alla simulazione della scelta del percorso, in Proceedings of the Annual SIDT Meeting, Reggio Calabria 2001, Franco Angeli (ed.) (in Italian).
29. Papola, A. (2004), Some developments of the Cross-Nested Logit Model, Transportation Research B, 38(9), 833-51.
30. Papola, A. & Marzano, V. (2004), Applicabilit del modello hybrid Logit-Probit alla simulazione della scelta del percorso, in Proceedings of the Annual SIDT Meeting, Reggio Calabria 2004, Franco Angeli (ed.) (in Italian).
31. Prashker, J. N. & Bekhor, S. (1998), Investigation of stochastic network loading procedures, in Proceedings of the 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
32. Praskher, J. N. & Bekhor, S. (2004), Route choice models used in the stochastic user equilibrium problem: a review, Transport Reviews, 24(6), 437-63.
33. Prato, C. (2005), Latent factors and route choice behaviour. Ph.D. thesis, Turin Polytechnic, Italy.
34. Ramming, M. S. (2001), Network knowledge and route choice. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
35. Russo, F. & Vitetta, A. (2003), An assignment model with modified Logit, which obviates enumeration and overlapping problems, Transportation, 30, 177-201.
36. Thurstone, L. (1927), A law of comparative judgement, Psychological Review, 34, 273-86.
37. Train, K. (2009), Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, New York.
38. Tversky, A. & Sattah, S. (1979), Preference trees, Psychological Review, 86, 542-73.
39. Vovsha, P. (1997), Cross-Nested Logit model: an application to mode choice in the Tel-Aviv metropolitan area, in Proceedings of 76th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
40. Vovsha, P. & Bekhor, S. (1998), The link-nested logit model of route choice: overcoming the route overlapping problem, Transportation Research Record, 1645, 133-42.
41. Wen, C. H. & Koppelman, F. S. (2001), The generalized nested logit model, Transportation Research B, 35(9), 627-41.