Erratum to New code site classification, amplification factors and normalized response spectra based on a worldwide ground-motion database (Bull Earthquake Eng, 10.1007/s10518-013-9429-4);New code site classification, amplification factors and normalized response spectra based on a worldwide ground-motion database

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 925-966

  Pitilakis, Kyriazis ^a   Riga, Evi ^a   Anastasiadis, Anastasios ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

Design spectra; Soil amplification factors; Soil classification system

Indexed keywords

AMPLIFICATION; ERRORS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR WAVES; SOILS; WAVE PROPAGATION;

ACCELERATION RESPONSE; AMPLIFICATION FACTORS; CLASSIFICATION SCHEME; CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; DESIGN SPECTRUM; GEOTECHNICAL PARAMETERS; SOIL AMPLIFICATION FACTORS; SOIL CLASSIFICATION;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

BEDROCK; DATABASE; GROUND MOTION; S-WAVE; SEISMICITY; SOIL CLASSIFICATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WAVE VELOCITY;

GREECE; ITALY; JAPAN; TURKEY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84880626200     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-013-9440-9     Document Type: Erratum

References (64)

1. Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (2008) Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA ground-motion relations. Earthq Spectra 24: 67-97. doi: 10. 1193/1. 2924360.
2. Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2010) Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean region and the Middle East. Seismol Res Lett 81: 195-206. doi: 10. 1785/gssrl. 81. 2. 195.
3. Akkar S, Çaǧnan Z, Yenier E, Erdoǧan Ö, Sandikkaya A, Gülkan P (2010) The recently compiled Turkish strong motion database: preliminary investigation for the seismological parameters. J Seismol 14: 457-479. doi: 10. 1007/s10950-009-9176-9.
4. ATC (1978) Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings. Report ATC 3-06, San Francisco, California, Applied Technology Council.
5. s,30 (or NEHRP Site Classes) from shallow velocity models (Depths%3c30 m). B Seismol Soc Am 94: 591-597. doi: 10. 1785/0120030105.
6. Boore DM, Joyner WB (1997) Site amplifications for generic rock sites. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87: 327-341.
7. S30 and velocities averaged over depths less than and greater than 30 meters. B Seismol Soc Am 101: 3046-3059. doi: 10. 1785/0120110071.
8. Borcherdt RD (1994) Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification). Earthq Spectra 10: 617-653. doi: 10. 1193/1. 1585791.
9. Borcherdt RD, Glassmoyer G (1992) On the characteristics of local geology and their influence on ground motions generated by the Loma Prieta earthquake in the San Francisco Bay region, California. B Seismol Soc Am 82: 603-641.
10. BSSC (Building Seismic Safety Council) (1995) 1994 Edition NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings, Part 1: provisions (FEMA 222A-223A).
11. BSSC (Building Seismic Safety Council) (1998) 1997 Edition NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, Part 1: provisions (FEMA 302).
12. BSSC (Building Seismic Safety Council) (2003) 2003 Edition NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, Part 1: provisions (FEMA 450).
13. Cadet H, Bard PY, Duval, AM (2008) A new proposal for site classification based on ambient vibration measurements and the Kiknet strong motion data set. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing.
14. sz. Bull Earthquake Eng 10: 451-489. doi: 10. 1007/s10518-011-9298-7.
15. s30: proxy for seismic amplification? Seismol Res Lett 79: 540-543. doi: 10. 1785/gssrl. 79. 4. 540.
16. Cauzzi C, Faccioli E (2008) Broadband (0. 05 to 20 s) prediction of displacement response spectra based on worldwide digital records. J Seismol 12: 453-475. doi: 10. 1007/s10950-008-9098-y.
17. CEN (European Committee for Standardization) (2004) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1: 2004. Brussels, Belgium.
18. Chávez-García FJ (2007) Site effects: from observation and modeling to accounting for them in building code. In: Pitilakis KD (ed) Earthquake geotechnical engineering, 4th international conference of earthquake geotechnical engineering-invited lectures. Springer, Berlin, pp 53-72.
19. Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2008) An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 24: 173-215. doi: 10. 1193/1. 2894832.
20. Choi Y, Stewart JP (2005) Nonlinear site amplification as function of 30 m shear wave velocity. Earthq Spectra 21: 1-30. doi: 10. 1193/1. 1856535.
21. Delavaud E, Cotton F, Akkar S, Scherbaum F, Danciu L, Beauval C, Drouet S, Douglas J, Basili R, Sandikkaya MA, Segou M, Faccioli E, Theodoulidis N (2012) Toward a ground-motion logic tree for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Europe. J Seismol. doi: 10. 1007/s10950-012-9281-z.
22. Di Alessandro C, Bonilla LF, Boore DM, Rovelli A, Scotti O (2012) Predominant-period site classification for response spectra prediction equations in Italy. B Seismol Soc Am 102: 680-695. doi: 10. 1785/0120110084.
23. Di Giacomo D, Gallipoli MR, Mucciarelli M, Parolai S, Richwalski SM (2005) Analysis and modeling of HVSR in the presence of a velocity inversion: the case of Venosa, Italy. B Seismol Soc Am 95: 2364-2372. doi: 10. 1785/0120040242.
24. DIN 4149: 2005 (2005) Buildings in German earthquake regions-design loads, analysis, and structural design of buildings. Normenausschuss Bauwesen (NABau) im Deutschen Institut für Normung e. V. (DIN), April 2005, 84 pp.
25. Dobry R, Iai S (2000) Recent developments in the understanding of earthquake site response and associated seismic code implementation. In: Proceedings of GeoEng2000. An International Conference on Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, Melbourne, Australia, pp 186-219.
26. S10, and HVSR in Italy. B Seismol Soc Am 99: 340-351. doi: 10. 1785/0120080083.
27. Housner GW (1952) Spectrum intensities of strong-motion earthquakes. In: Proceedings of symposium on earthquakes and blast effects on structures, earthquake engineering research institute, pp 20-36.
28. ICBO (International Council of Building Officials) (1997) Uniform Building Code. Whittier, CA.
29. ICC (International Code Council) (2000) International Building Code. Whittier, CA.
30. Japan Road Association (1980) Specifications for Highway Bridges Part V, Seismic Design. Maruzen Co., LTD.
31. Japan Road Association (1990) Specifications for Highway Bridges Part V, Seismic Design. Maruzen Co., LTD.
32. Kokusho T, Sato K (2008) Surface-to-base amplification evaluated from KiK-net vertical array strong motion records. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28: 707-716. doi: 10. 1016/j. soildyn. 2007. 10. 016.
33. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
34. Lee VW, Trifunac MD (2010) Should average shear-wave velocity in the top 30m of soil be used to describe seismic amplification? Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30: 1250-1258. doi: 10. 1016/j. soildyn. 2010. 05. 007.
35. Lermo J, Chávez-García FJ (1993) Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. B Seismol Soc Am 83: 1574-1594.
36. s,30. B Earthq Eng 9: 1877-1898. doi: 10. 1007/s10518-011-9274-2.
37. MacMurdo J (1824) Papers relating to the earthquake which occurred in India in 1819. Philos Mag 63: 105-177. doi: 10. 1080/14786442408644477.
38. Mallet R (1862) Great Neapolitan earthquake of 1857. Chapman and Hall, London.
39. Milne J (1908) Seismology, 2nd ed, London.
40. Mohraz B (1976) Earthquake response spectra for different geologic conditions. B Seismol Soc Am 66: 915-935.
41. s30 and other estimates of site amplification in Italy. In: Proceedings of first European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, 3-8 September 2006, paper No. 274.
42. Nakamura Y (1989) A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremors on the ground surface. Q Railw Tech Res Inst 30: 1.
43. s30 and earthquake amplifications, and their reliability for seismic design codes: Adapazari (Turkey) Case. Geoph Res Abstr 13.
44. Park D, Hashash YMA (2004) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis with non linear site effects in the Mississippi embayment. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Paper n. 1549 (on CD-Rom).
45. Pitilakis K (2004) Site effects. In: Ansal A (ed) Recent advances in earthquake geotechnical engineering and microzonation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 139-197.
46. Pitilakis K, Gazepis C, Anastasiadis A (2004) Design response spectra and soil classification for seismic code provisions. In: Proceedings of 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, paper n. 2904, Vancouver, B. C., Canada.
47. Pitilakis K, Gazepis C, Anastasiadis A (2006) Design response spectra and soil classification for seismic code provisions. In: Proceedings of geotechnical evaluation and application of the seismic Eurocode EC8 2003-2006, ETC-12 Workshop, NTUA Athens, pp 37-52.
48. Pitilakis K, Riga E, Anastasiadis A (2012) Design spectra and amplification factors for Eurocode 8. B Earthq Eng 10: 1377-1400. doi: 10. 1007/s10518-012-9367-6.
49. Reid HF (1910) The California earthquake of April 18, (1907) In: The mechanics of the earthquake, Carnegie Institute of Washington. Publ. 87: 21.
50. Rey J, Faccioli E, Bommer JJ (2002) Derivation of design soil coefficients (S) and response spectral shapes for Eurocode 8 using the European Strong-Motion Database. J Seismol 6: 547-555. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1021169715992.
51. Rodriguez-Marek A, Bray JD, Abrahamson NA (2001) An empirical geotechnical seismic site response procedure. Earthq Spectra 17: 65-87. doi: 10. 1193/1. 1586167.
52. Seed HB, Ugas C, Lysmer J (1976a) Site dependent spectra for earthquake-resistant design. B Seismol Soc Am 66: 221-244.
53. Seed HB, Murarka R, Lysmer J, Idriss IM (1976b) Relationships between maximum acceleration, maximum velocity, distance from source and local site conditions for moderately strong earthquakes. B Seismol Soc Am 66: 1323-1342.
54. Seed HB, Romo MP, Sun I, Jaime A, Lysmer J (1988) The Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985-relationships between soil conditions and earthquake ground motions. Earthq Spectra 4: 687-729.
55. Steidl JH (2000) Site response in southern California for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. B Seismol Soc Am 90: S149-S169. doi: 10. 1785/0120000504.
56. Stewart JP, Liu AH, Choi Y (2003) Amplification factors for spectral acceleration in tectonically active regions. B Seismol Soc Am 93: 332-352. doi: 10. 1785/0120020049.
57. Stewart JP, Choi Y, Graves R (2005) Empirical characterization of site conditions on strong ground motion. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley.
58. Toro GR, Silva WJ (2001) Scenario Earthquakes for St. Louis, MO, and Memphis, TN, and Seismic Hazard Maps for the Central United States Region Including the Effect of Site Conditions. Final Technical Report, USGS External Grant 1434-HQ-GR-02981, 248 pp.
59. Trifunac MD (2012) Earthquake response spectra for performance based design-a critical review. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 37: 73-83. doi: 10. 1016/j. soildyn. 2012. 01. 019.
60. Wald LA, Mori J (2000) Evaluation of methods for estimating linear site-response amplifications in the Los Angeles region. B Seismol Soc Am 90: S32-S42. doi: 10. 1785/0119970170.
61. Wood HO (1908) Distribution of apparent intensity in San Francisco, in the California earthquake of April 18, 1906. Report of the State Earthquake Investigation Commission, Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington DC, vol 1, pp 220-245.
62. Yenier E, Sandikkaya MA, Akkar S (2010) Report on the fundamental features of the extended strong motion databank prepared for the SHARE project (v1. 0).
63. Zhao JX, Zhang J, Asano A, Ohno Y, Oouchi T, Takahashi T, Ogawa H, Irikura K, Thio HK, Somerville PG, Fukushima Y, Fukushima Y (2006a) Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period. B Seismol Soc Am 96: 898-913. doi: 10. 1785/0120050122.
64. Zhao JX, Irikura K, Zhang J, Fukushima Y, Somerville PG, Asano A, Ohno Y, Oouchi T, Takahashi T, Ogawa H (2006b) An empirical site classification method for strong motion station in Japan using H/V response spectral ratio. B Seismol Soc Am 96: 914-925. doi: 10. 1785/0120050124.