Weak ties and the core discussion network: Why people regularly discuss important matters with unimportant alters

Social Networks

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 470-483

  Small, Mario Luis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Core discussion network; Discussion topics; Important alters; Mobilization; Strong ties; Weak ties

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880616618     PISSN: 03788733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2013.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis 2002, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ. 2nd ed.
2. Bailey S., Marsden P.V. Interpretation and interview context: examining the general social survey name generator using cognitive methods. Social Networks 1999, 21(3):287-309.
3. Bearman P.S., Parigi P. Cloning headless frogs and other important matters: conversation topics and network structure. Social Forces 2004, 83(2):535-557.
4. Bernard H.R., Killworth P., Kronenfeld D., Sailer L. The problem of informant accuracy: the validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology 1984, 13:495-517.
5. Bianchi S.M., Robinson J.P., Milkie M.A. Changing Rhythms of American Life 2006, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
6. Bourdieu P. Outline of a Theory of Practice 1977, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
7. Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education 1986, 241-258. Greenwood, New York. J.G. Richardson (Ed.).
8. Brashears M. Small networks and high isolation? A reexamination of american discussion networks. Social Networks 2011, 33:331-341.
9. Burt R.S. Network items and the general social survey. Social Networks 1984, 6:293-339.
10. Burt R.S. General social survey items. Connections 1985, 8(2/3):119-123.
11. Burt R.S. A note on strangers, friends, and happiness. Social Networks 1987, 9(4):311-331.
12. Burt R.S., Guliarte M. A note on scaling the general social survey network item response categories. Social Networks 1986, 8:387-396.
13. Chua V. Contacts and Contexts. Social Networks 2012, 34(4):534-538.
14. Coleman J.S. Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology 1986, 91(6):1309-1335.
15. Coleman J. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 1988, 94:s95-s120.
16. Cornwell B., Laumann E.O., Phillip Schumm L. The Social Connectedness of Older Adults. American Sociological Review 2008, 73(2):185-203.
17. Coromina L., Coenders G. Reliability and validity of egocentered network data collected via web: a meta-analysis of multilevel multitrait multimethod studies. Social Networks 2006, 28:209-231.
18. Dewey J. Democracy and Education 2004 [1916], Dover, Mineola, NY.
19. Diener Ed., Emmons R.A., Larsen R.J., Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 1985, 49(1):71-75.
20. Doreian P., Conti N. Social context, spatial structure, and social network structure. Social Networks 2012, 34:32-46.
21. Emirbayer M., Goodwin J. Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology 1994, 99(6):1411-1454.
22. Fischer C.S. To Dwell Among Friends 1982, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
23. Fischer C.S. Comment on McPherson, Smith-Lovin, and Brashears, ASR, June 2006: the 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks: an artifact?. American Sociological Review 2008, 74(4):657-669.
24. Fischer C.S. Still Connected: Family and Friends in America since 1970 2011, Russell Sage, New York.
25. Fischer C.S. The Loneliness Scare is Back." Made in America: Notes on American Life from American History Blog 2012, (retrieved 07.05.13). http://madeinamericathebook.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/the-loneliness-scare-is-back/.
26. Furman F.K. Facing the Mirror: Older Women and Beauty Shop Culture 1997, Routledge, New York.
27. General Social Survey GSS: America's Social Survey. Survey questionnaire 1985, NORC, Chicago.
28. General Social Survey General Social Survey (2004) GSS Questionnaire 2004, NORC, Chicago.
29. Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 1973, 78:1360-1380.
30. Granovetter M. Getting a Job 1974, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. Hochschild A. The Second Shift 1989, Avon Books, New York.
32. Hurlbert J.S., Haines V., Beggs J.J. Core networks and tie activation: what kinds of routine networks allocate resources in nonroutine situations?. American Sociological Review 2000, 65(4):598-618.
33. Jacobs J., Gerson K. The Time Divide: Work, Family, and Gender Inequality 2004, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. Joas H. The Creativity of Action 1996, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
35. Kadushin C. Too much investment in social capital?. Connections 2004, 26:75-90.
36. Little R., Rubin D. The analysis of social science data with missing values. Sociological Methods and Research 1989, 18(2/3):292-326.
37. Lin N. Social Capital: A Theory of Structure and Action 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
38. Long S.J. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables 1997, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
39. Marin A. Are respondents more likely to list alters with certain characteristics? Implications for name generator data. Social Networks 2004, 26(4):289-307.
40. Marsden P. Core discussion networks of americans. American Sociological Review 1987, 52(1):122-131.
41. McCallister L., Fischer C.S. A procedure for surveying personal networks. Sociological Methods and Research 1978, 7:131-148.
42. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Brashears M.E. Social isolation in America: changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review 2006, 71:353-375.
43. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Brashears M. Reply to Fischer: models and marginals: using survey evidence to study social networks. American Sociological Review 2009, 74(4):670-681.
44. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J.M. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 2001, 27:415-444.
45. Merton R. The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review 1936, 1(6):894-904.
46. Merton V., Robert M., Barber E. Client ambivalence in professional relationships: the problem of seeking help from strangers. New Directions in Helping: Volume 2, Help-Seeking 1983, 13-44. Academic Press, New York. M. Bella, DePaulo, Arie Nadler, D. Jeffrey, Fischer (Eds.).
47. Olfson M., Marcus S. National trends in outpatient therapy. American Journal of Psychiatry 2010, 167(12):1456-1463.
48. Paik A., Sanchagrin K. Social isolation in America: an artifact. American Sociological Review 2013, 78(3):339-360.
49. Perry B.L., Pescosolido B.A. Functional specificity in discussion networks: the influence or general and problem-specific networks on health outcomes. Social Networks 2010, 32(4):345-357.
50. Pescosolido B.A. Beyond rational choice: the social dynamics of how people seek help. American Journal of Sociology 1992, 97(4):1096-1138.
51. Ruan D. The content of the general social survey discussion networks: an exploration of general social survey discussion name generator in a Chinese context. Social Networks 1998, 20:247-264.
52. Sailer K., McCulloh I. Social networks and spatial configuration: how office layouts drive social interaction. Social Networks 2012, 34(1):47-58.
53. Simon H.A. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review 1956, 63(2):129-138.
54. Small M.L. Unanticipated Gains 2009, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
55. Smith S. Lone Pursuit: Distrust and Defensive Individualism among the Black Poor 2007, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
56. Straits B. Ego's important discussants or significant people: an experiment in varying the wording or personal network name generators. Social Networks 2000, 22:123-140.
57. Suzman R. The national social life, health, and aging project: an introduction. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 2009, 64B(Suppl. (1)):i5-i11.
58. Uehara E. Dual exchange theory, social network analysis and informal social support. American Journal of Sociology 1990, 96(3):521-557.
59. Vehovar V., Manfreda K.L., Koren G., Hlebec V. Measuring ego-centered social networks on the web: questionnaire design issues. Social Networks 2008, 30:213-222.
60. Völker B., Flap H. The Survey on the Social Networks of the Dutch (SSND1): Data and Codebook 2002, Utrecht University/ICS, Utrecht.
61. Wellman B., Wortley S. Different strokes from different folks: community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology 1990, 96:558-588.