Communicating the theory, practice and principles of language testing to test stakeholders: Some reflections

Language Testing

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 403-412

  Taylor, Lynda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BEDFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment literacy; language assessment literacy; test stakeholders

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880595714     PISSN: 02655322     EISSN: 14770946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0265532213480338     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Developing academic literacy. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang; 2010:.
2. Brumfit CDeveloping academic literacy. Blue G., ed. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang; 2010:.
3. Davies A.Textbook trends in teaching language testing.Language Testing. 2008;25 (3): 327-347.
4. Dyas D.,Hughes E.The Bible in Western culture: The student's guide. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2005:.
5. Fulcher G.Assessment literacy for the language classroom.Language Assessment Quarterly. 2012;9 (2): 113-132.
6. Hyland K.,Hamp-Lyons L.EAP: Issues and directions.Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2002;1 (1): 1-12.
7. Language testing: The construction and use of foreign language tests. London: Longman; 1961:.
8. Rea-Dickins P.So, why do we need relationships with stakeholders in language testing? A view from the UK.Language Testing. 1997;14 (3): 304-314.
9. SavilleN. (2009). Developing a model for investigating the impact of language assessment within educational contexts by a public examination provider. PhD dissertation, University of Bedfordshire.
10. Taylor L.Stakeholders in language testing.Cambridge ESOL Research Notes. 2000;2:2-4.
11. Taylor L.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009:21-36.