Is 20% of a loaf enough?

Cancer

Volumn 119, Issue 15, 2013, Pages 2815-

  Young, Robert P ^a   Hopkins, Raewyn J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER MODEL; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER RISK; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LETTER; LUNG CANCER; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION;

FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE;

EID: 84880571013     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28134     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Kessler K,. Is 20% of a loaf enough? Cancer. 2013; 119: 1294-1297.
2. Tammemagi MC, Katki HA, Hocking WG, et al. Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening. N Eng J Med. 2013; 368: 728-736.
3. Young RP, Hopkins RJ, Midthun DE,. Computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. JAMA. 2012; 308: 1321-1322.
4. Young RP, Hopkins RJ,. Increasing smoker's risk perception improves CT screening participation. Thorax. 2012: 67: 834-835.
5. Hopkins RJ, Young RP, Hay B, et al. Lung cancer risk testing enhances NRT uptake and quit rates in randomly recruited smokers offered a gene-based risk test [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Med. 2012; 185. Abstract A2590.