Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1782-1789

  Westfall, Mark ^a   Krantz, Steve ^b   Mullin, Christopher ^c   Kaufman, Christopher ^d  

^a Theda Clark Regional Medical Center   (United States)

^b Gold Cross Ambulance Service   (United States)

^c Integra Group   (United States)

^d ZOLL Medical Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

cardiac arrest; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; devices; meta analysis; return of spontaneous circulation

Indexed keywords

CARDIAC RESUSCITATOR; HUMAN; MANUAL CHEST COMPRESSION; MECHANICAL CHEST COMPRESSION; META ANALYSIS; OUT OF HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESUSCITATION; RETURN OF SPONTANEOUS CIRCULATION; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THERAPY EFFECT;

CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; HEART MASSAGE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST;

EID: 84880570281     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a24e3     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Sasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, et al: Predictors of survival from out-ofhospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010; 3:63-81
2. Roine RO, Kajaste S, Kaste M: Neuropsychological sequelae of cardiac arrest. JAMA 1993; 269:237-242
3. Cheskes S, Schmicker RH, Christenson J, et al; Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Investigators: Perishock pause: An independent predictor of survival from out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest. Circulation 2011; 124:58-66
4. Halperin HR, Paradis N, Ornato JP, et al: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a novel chest compression device in a porcine model of cardiac arrest: Improved hemodynamics and mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:2214-2220
5. Ikeno F, Kaneda H, Hongo Y, et al: Augmentation of tissue perfusion by a novel compression device increases neurologically intact survival in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2006; 68:109-118
6. Steen S, Liao Q, Pierre L, et al: Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation 2002; 55:285-299
7. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al: Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283:2008-2012
8. Casner M, Andersen D, Isaacs SM: The impact of a new CPR assist device on rate of return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care 2005; 9:61-67
9. Ornato JP, Peberdy MA, Edwards DP, et al: Improvement in field return of spontaneous circulation using circumferential chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Prehosp Emerg Care 2005; 9:102
10. Hallstrom A, Rea TD, Sayre MR, et al: Manual chest compression vs use of an automated chest compression device during resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A randomized trial. JAMA 2006; 295:2620-2628
11. Ong ME, Ornato JP, Edwards DP, et al: Use of an automated, loaddistributing band chest compression device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. JAMA 2006; 295:2629-2637
12. Swanson M, Poniatowski M, O'Keefe M, et al: A CPR assist device increased emergency department admission and end tidal carbon dioxide partial pressures during treatment of out of hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2006; 114:II-554
13. Steinmetz J, Barnung S, Nielsen SL, et al: Improved survival after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using new guidelines. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008; 52:908-913
14. Paradis NA, Kamlan D, Ghilarducci D, et al: The California AutoPulse quality assurance registry. Circulation 2009; 120:S1457
15. Lundy D, McGeorge W, Silver A: Mechanical chest compressions improve short-term outcome in patients requiring CPR during transport. Circulation 2009; 120:S1470-1471
16. Axelsson C, Nestin J, Svensson L, et al: Clinical consequences of the introduction of mechanical chest compression in the EMS system for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-a pilot study. Resuscitation 2006; 71:47-55
17. Rubertsson S, Huzevka T, Smekal D, et al: Early survival after cardiac arrest in a pilot study using the LUCAS device compared to manual chest compression during CPR. Circulation 2007; 116:II-386
18. Wilde RD, Weijden PV, Haan MD, et al: ROSC at hospital admission in out of hospital cardiac arrest using LUCAS. Resuscitation 2008; 77:S49
19. Smekal D, Johansson J, Huzevka T: A pilot study of mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS™ device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2011; 82:702-706
20. Taylor GJ, Rubin R, Tucker M, et al: External cardiac compression. A randomized comparison of mechanical and manual techniques. JAMA 1978; 240:644-646
21. Brooks SC, Bigham BL, Morrison LJ: Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 19:CD007260
22. Reynolds JC, Salcido DD, Menegazzi JJ: Coronary perfusion pressure and return of spontaneous circulation after prolonged cardiac arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care 2010; 14:78-84
23. Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, et al: Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005; 293:299-304