Outpatient colonoscopy complications in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: A prospective analysis

Cancer

Volumn 119, Issue SUPPL. 15, 2013, Pages 2849-2854

  Castro, Georgina ^a   Azrak, M Fuad ^b   Seeff, Laura C ^a   Royalty, Janet ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; complications; perforation; screening

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DEATH; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTESTINE PERFORATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OCCULT BLOOD TEST; OUTPATIENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTPOLYPECTOMY BLEEDING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA;

COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPLICATIONS; PERFORATION; SCREENING;

AMBULATORY CARE; CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (U.S.); COHORT STUDIES; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84880567147     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28159     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134: 1570-1595.
2. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149: 627-637.
3. Singh H, Penfold RB, DeCoster C, et al. Colonoscopy and its complications across a Canadian regional health authority. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69 (3 pt 2): 665-671.
4. Arora G, Mannalithara A, Singh G, Gerson LB, Triadafilopoulos G,. Risk of perforation from a colonoscopy in adults: a large population-based study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69 (3 pt 2): 654-664.
5. Iqbal CW, Chun YS, Farley DR,. Colonoscopic perforations: a retrospective review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005; 9: 1229-1235; discussion 1236.
6. Iqbal CW, Cullinane DC, Schiller HJ, Sawyer MD, Zietlow SP, Farley DR,. Surgical management and outcomes of 165 colonoscopic perforations from a single institution. Arch Surg. 2008; 143: 701-706; discussion 706-707.
7. Levin TR, Zhao W, Conell C, et al. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 145: 880-886.
8. Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB, et al. Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 150: 849-857, W152.
9. Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Hilsden RJ, et al. Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology. 2008; 135: 1899-1906, 1906 e1.
10. Ko CW, Riffle S, Michaels L, et al. Serious complications within 30 days of screening and surveillance colonoscopy are uncommon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010; 8: 166-173.
11. Seeff LC, DeGroff A, Tangka F, et al. Development of a federally funded demonstration colorectal cancer screening program. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008; 5: A64.
12. Seeff LC, Royalty J, Helsel WE, et al. Clinical outcomes from the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program. Cancer. 2013;119(suppl 15):2820-2833.
13. Ko CW, Riffle S, Shapiro JA, et al. Incidence of minor complications and time lost from normal activities after screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 65: 648-656.
14. Teoh AY, Poon CM, Lee JF, et al. Outcomes and predictors of mortality and stoma formation in surgical management of colonoscopic perforations: a multicenter review. Arch Surg. 2009; 144: 9-13.
15. Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T,. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 53: 620-627.
16. Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, Jacobson JS, Grann VR, Neugut AI,. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95: 230-236.
17. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 1207-1217.
18. Leffler DA, Kheraj R, Garud S, et al. The incidence and cost of unexpected hospital use after scheduled outpatient endoscopy. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170: 1752-1757.
19. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahlen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G,. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 162-168.
20. Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 1863-1872.