Next on the agenda: Gender

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 139-142

  Galley, H F ^a   Colvin, L A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIA; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIOLOGY; CLINICAL MEDICINE; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE;

EID: 84880563361     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet133     Document Type: Editorial

References (29)

1. Baerlocher MO, Hussain R, Bradley J. Gender patternsamongst Canadian anesthesiologists. Can J Anesth 2006; 53: 437-41
2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2011. Medical Labour Force 2009. http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id= 10737419680 (accessed 20 November 2012)
3. Equality Challenge Unit. Equality in higher education: Statistical report, 2011. Part one: Staff
4. Hausmann R, Tyson LD, Zahidi S. The Global Gender Gap Report, 2011. Available from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF-GenderGap-Report-2011.pdf
5. Gudmundsson HK. The Gender Challenge in Research Funding-Assessing the European National Scenes-Iceland, 2008. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/ research/science-society/document-library/pdf-06/iceland-research-funding-en.pdf
6. Fitzpatrick S. Staffing Levels of Medical Clinical Academics in UK Medical Schools. Medical Schools Council, 2012. Available from http://www.medschools.ac.uk/publications/Pages/ClinicalAcademic StaffSurvey2012.aspx
7. Wong CA, Stock MC. The status of women in academic anesthesiology: A progress report. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 178-84
8. Pandit JJ. A National Strategy for Academic Anaesthesia. London: Royal College of Anaesthetists, 2005
9. Jagsi R, Guancial EA,Worobey CC, et al. The 'gender gap' in authorship of academic medical literature-a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 281-7
10. Sidhu R, Rajashekhar P, Lavin VL, et al. The gender imbalance inacademic medicine: A study of female authorship in the United Kingdom. J R Soc Med 2009; 102: 337-42
11. Duch J, Zeng XHT, Sales-PardoM, Radicchi F, Otis S, et al. The possible role of resource requirements and academic career-choice risk on gender differences in publication rate and impact. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: E51332. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0051332
12. Cole JR, Zuckerman H. The productivity puzzle: Persistence and changes in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. Adv Motiv Achiev 1984; 2: 217-58
13. Long JS. Measures of sex-differences in scientific productivity. Soc Forces 1992; 71: 159-78
14. Webster NR. Bibliometrics and assessing performance and worth. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 306-7
15. Symonds MRE, Gemmell NJ, Braisher TL, Gorringe KL, Elgar MA. Gender differences in publication output: Towards an unbiased metric of research performance. PLoS ONE 2006; 1: E127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000127
16. Heckenberg C, Drum L. Gender aspects in medical publication-the Wiener klinischeWochenschrift. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2010; 122: 141-5
17. Kennedy BL, Lin Y, Dickstein LJ. Women on the editorial boards of major journals. Acad Med 2001; 76: 849-51
18. Keiser J, Utzinger J, Singer BH. Gender composition of editorial boards of general medical journals. Lancet 2003; 362: 1336
19. Jagsi NJ, Tarbell NJ, Henault LE, et al. The representation of women on the editorial boards of major medical journals: A 35-year perspective. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 544-8
20. Amrein K, Langmann A, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Pieber TR, Zollner-Schwetz I. Women underrepresented on editorial boards of 60 major medical journals. Gend Med 2011; 8: 378-87
21. MetzI, HarzingA-W.Genderdiversity in editorial boardsofmanagement journals. Acad Manag Learn Educ 2009; 8: 540-57
22. Royal College of Anaesthetists Census Report, 2007. Available from http://www.rcoa.ac.uk/tags/census
23. Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine Beyond Bias and Barriers. Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2007
24. Marsh J. Women in science - what's the world missing? Eur Sci Editing 2012; 38: 2
25. http://www.30percentclub.org.uk (accessed 18 February 2013)
26. http://www.gender-summit.eu/ (accessed 20 November 2012)
27. http://www.ted.com/talks/sheryl-sandberg-why-we-have-too-few-women- leaders.html (accessed 18 November 2012)
28. Bebbington D. Revisiting diversity in leadership. In Practice 2012; 31: 1-4
29. Athena SWAN Charter for Women in Science. http://www. athenaswan.org.uk/content/athena-swan(accessed 22November 2012)