Using changes in framing to account for differences in a teacher's classroom behavior

Learning in the Disciplines: ICLS 2010 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 145-152

  Lineback, Jennifer Evarts ^a   Goldberg, Fred ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR PATTERNS; BEHAVIORAL DATA; BODY ORIENTATION; INQUIRY-BASED; INSTRUCTIONAL MODULES; LEARNING PROGRESSIONS; TEACHERS'; WATER CYCLE;

STUDENTS;

TEACHING;

EID: 84880559995     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Bateson, G. (1972). A Theory of Play and Fantasy (Originally published 1954). In G. Bateson (Ed.), Steps to an ecology of mind; collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology (pp. xxvii, 545 p.) San Francisco: Chandler Pub. Co.
2. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139-148.
3. Goffman, E. (1986). Frame Analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Northeastern University Press.
4. Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 89-120). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
5. Levin, D. M. (2008). What secondary science teachers pay attention to in the classroom: Situating teaching in institutional and social systems. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, 2008)
6. Levin, D. M., Hammer, D. & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice Teachers' attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60: 142-154.
7. NRC. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. NRC. (2001). Classroom assessment and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: Committee on Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards.
9. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979.
10. Redish, E. F. (2004). A theoretical framework for physics education research: Modeling student thinking. In E. Redish, C. Tarsitani & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI: Italian Physical Society.
11. Scherr, R. E., & Hammer, D. (2009). Student behavior and epistemological framing: Examples from collaborative active-learning activities in physics. Cognition and Instruction, 27(2), 147-174.
12. Tannen, D. (1993). Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Thompson, J., Braaten, M., Windschitl, M. (2009). Learning progression as vision tools for advancing novice teachers' pedagogical performance. Paper presented for LeaPS Conference, Iowa City, June 2009.