Information architecture for design tolerancing: From conceptual to the detail design

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 1999, Pages 951-958

  Roy, U ^a   Sudarsan, R ^b,c   Sriram, R D ^c   Lyons, K W ^c   Duffey, M R ^d  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d The George Washington University   (United States)

Author keywords

Assembly modeling; Behavior model; Conceptual design; Design for tolerancing; Function; Object oriented model; Tolerance analysis and synthesis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; DECISION MAKING; FITS AND TOLERANCES; PRODUCT DESIGN; SPECIFICATIONS;

ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS; BEHAVIOR REPRESENTATION; COMPREHENSIVE INFORMATION; FUNCTIONAL REPRESENTATION; FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT; INFORMATION ARCHITECTURES; INTEGRATION OF FUNCTIONS; TOLERANCE ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS;

ASSEMBLY;

EID: 84880547829     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC99/DAC-8704     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Sugumura Nobuhiro A study on product model for design and analysis of mechanical assemblies based on STEP, Proceedings of the Japan- USA symposium on Flexible Automation, Kobe, Japan.
2. ISO TC 213, Dimensional and geometrical product specification and verification, http:lIwww.ds.dklisotc2l3.
3. Baxter, J. E., luster, N, P., and de Pennington, A. (1994). Verification of product design specifications using a functional data model. In Proceedings of 1994 Lancaster International Workshop on Engineering Design, Computer Aided Conceptual Design.
4. Bharadwaj, B. (1995).A framework for tolerance synthesis of mechanical components. Master's thesis, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
5. Chandrasekaran, B., Goel, A. K., and Iwasaki, Y. (1993). Functional representation of design rationale. Computer, pages 48-56.
6. Gorti, S. and Sriram, R. (1996). From symbol to form: A framework for conceptual design. Computer Aided Design, 28(11):853-870.
7. Gupta, S. K., Paredis, C. J. J., Sinha, R., Wang, C. H., and Brown, P. F. (1997). Intelligent assembly modeling and, simulation. ICES 05-104-97, Carnegie Mellon University, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
8. Johnson, A. L. (1990). Functional modeling: A new development in computer-aided design. In Yoshikawa, H. and Holden, T., editors. Intelligent CAD, volume II, pages 203-212. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North Holland, Amsterdam.
9. Ko, H. and Lee, K. (1989). Automatic assembling procedure generation from mating conditions. CAD, 21 (9):561-569.
10. Lai, K. and Wilson, W. R. D. (1989). FDL - A Language for Function Description and Realization in Mechanical Design. Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design, Transactions of the ASME, 111:117-123.
11. Lee, K. and Gossard, D. (1985). A hierarchical data structure for representing assemblies: Part i. Computer Aided Design, 17(1):15-19.
12. L.E.Farmer and C.A.Gladman (1996). Tolerance technology- Computer-based analysis. Aniials ofCIRP, 35(1).
13. Mantripragada, R., Cunningham, T., and Whitney, D. (1997). Assembly oriented design: A new approach to designing assemblies. In Pratt, M., Sriram, R., and Wozny, M., editors. Product Modeling for Computer Integrated Design and Manufacture, pages 308-324. Chapman & Hall.
14. M.J.Pratt (1998). Parametrization and constraints for explicit geometric product models. Technical Report N184, ISO TCI 84/SC4AVG12. (http:Z/www.nist.gov/sc4/wg_qc/wg 12/n 184/).
15. Murdock, J. W., Szykman, S., and Sriram, R. D. (1997). An information modeling framework to support design databases and repositories. In Proceedings of DEC97. 1997 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Sacramento, California.
16. Narahari, Y, Sudarsan, R., Lyons, K. W., Duffey, M. R., and Sriram, R. D. (1998). Design for Tolerance of Electro-mechanical Assemblies: An Integrated Approach. NISTIR 6223, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
17. Qu, G. (1993). Automatic Tolerance Allocation with Process Selection Based on a Hierarchical Assentbly Model. PhD thesis. University of Minnesota, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
18. Rajan, V., K.W.Lyons, and Sreerangam, R. (1997). Identification of requirements and representation for assembly modeling. In Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning, Marina del Ray, CA.
19. Roy, U. and Bharadwaj, B. (1996). Tolerance synthesis in a product design system. Technical Paper MS96-146. North American Manufacturing Research Institution. Society of Manufacturing Engineers. Dearborn, MI.
20. Roy, U. and C.R.Liu (1988). Establishment of functional relationships between product components in assembly database. CAD. 20(10):570-580.
21. Roy, U., P.Banerjee, and C.R.Liu (1989). Design of an automated assembly environment. CAD, 21(9):561-569.
22. Srikanth, S. and Turner, J. (1990). Toward a unified representation of mechanical assembly. Engineering with Computers, 6(2): 103-112.
23. Srinivasan, V, and O'Connor, M. (1996). Towards an ISO standard for statistical tolerancing. In Kimura, F., editor. Proceedings of the Fourth CIRP Design Seminar on Computer-Aided Tolerancing, pages 159-172. Chapman & Hall, London.
24. Sudarsan, R., Lyons, K., and (Editors), Mi P. (1997). Assembly Level Tolerancing: Standards and Implementation Issues. Workshop Handout, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
25. Tsai, J.-C. and Cutkosky, M. R. (1997). Representation and reasoning of geometric tolerances in design. 7M-EDAM, 11:325-341.
26. Wang, N. and Ozsoy, T. (1990). Representation of assemblies for automatic tolerance chain generation. Engineering with Computers, 6(2):121-126.
27. Whitney, D., Gilbert, O., and Jastrzebski, M. (1994). Representation of geometric variations using matrix transforms for statistical tolerance analysis in assemblies. Research in Engineering Design, 6:191-210.