Synergistic effects of nanotopography and co-culture with endothelial cells on osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 30, 2013, Pages 7257-7268

  Kim, Jangho ^a   Kim, Hong Nam ^b   Lim, Ki Taek ^a   Kim, Yeonju ^b   Pandey, Shambhavi ^a   Garg, Pankaj ^a   Choung, Yun Hoon ^c   Choung, Pill Hoon ^b   Suh, Kahp Yang ^b   Chung, Jong Hoon ^a,b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c Ajou University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Co culture; Endothelial cells; Mesenchymal stem cells; Nanotopography; Osteogenesis

Indexed keywords

COCULTURE; HUMAN MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS (HMSCS); HUMAN UMBILICAL ENDOTHELIAL CELLS (HUVECS); MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NANOTOPOGRAPHIES; OSTEOGENESIS; OSTEOGENIC PHENOTYPE; RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION;

CELL CULTURE; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; STEM CELLS;

NANOTECHNOLOGY;

ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CELL DENSITY; CELL DISRUPTION; COCULTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NANOANALYSIS; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

CO-CULTURE; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; OSTEOGENESIS;

BONE AND BONES; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELLULAR MICROENVIRONMENT; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; HUMAN UMBILICAL VEIN ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; HUMANS; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; NANOPARTICLES; OSTEOGENESIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84880510571     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.029     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Giannoudis P.V., Dinopoulos H., Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury 2005, 36:S20-S27.
2. Kim H.N., Jiao A., Hwang N.S., Kim M.S., Kang D.H., Kim D.H., et al. Nanotopography-guided tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2013, 65:536-558.
3. McMahon R.E., Wang L., Skoracki R., Mathur A.B. Development of nanomaterials for bone repair and regeneration. JBiomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013, 101:387-397.
4. Wang Y., Kim H.J., Vunjak-Novakovic G., Kaplan D.L. Stem cell-based tissue engineering with silk biomaterials. Biomaterials 2006, 27:6064-6082.
5. Davis H.E., Case E.M., Miller S.L., Genetos D.C., Leach J.K. Osteogenic response to BMP-2 of hMSCs grown on apatite-coated scaffolds. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011, 108:2727-2735.
6. Lutolf M.P., Gilbert P.M., Blau H.M. Designing materials to direct stem-cell fate. Nature 2009, 462:433-441.
7. Lutolf M.P., Blau H.M. Artificial stem cell niches. Adv Mater 2009, 21:3255-3268.
8. Dalby M.J., Gadegaard N., Tare R., Andar A., Riehle M.O., Herzyk P., et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007, 6:997-1003.
9. Oh S., Brammer K.S., Li Y.S.J., Teng D., Engler A.J., Chien S., et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:2130-2135.
10. Guilak F., Cohen D.M., Estes B.T., Gimble J.M., Liedtke W., Chen C.S. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5:17-26.
11. Nelson T.J., Behfar A., Yamada S., Martinez-Fernandez A., Terzic A. Stem cell platforms for regenerative medicine. Clin Transl Sci 2009, 2:222-227.
12. Xue Y., Xing Z., Hellem S., Arvidson K., Mustafa K. Endothelial cells influence the osteogenic potential of bone marrow stromal cells. Biomed Eng Online 2009, 8:34.
13. Ma J., van den Beucken J.J., Yang F., Both S.K., Cui F.Z., Pan J., et al. Coculture of osteoblasts and endothelial cells: optimization of culture medium and cell ratio. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2011, 17:349-357.
14. Suh K.Y., Park M.C., Kim P. Capillary force lithography: a versatile tool for structured biomaterials interface towards cell and tissue engineering. Adv Funct Mater 2009, 19:2699-2712.
15. Choi S.J., Kim H.N., Bae W.G., Suh K.Y. Modulus- and surface energy-tunable ultraviolet-curable polyurethane acrylate: properties and applications. JMater Chem 2011, 21:14325-14335.
16. Kim D.H., Provenzano P.P., Smith C.L., Levchenko A. Matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cell function. JCell Biol 2012, 197:351-360.
17. Teixeira A.I., Abrams G.A., Bertics P.J., Murphy C.J., Nealey P.F. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates. JCell Sci 2003, 116:1881-1892.
18. McNamara L.E., McMurray R.J., Biggs M.J., Kantawong F., Oreffo R.O., Dalby M.J. Nanotopographical control of stem cell differentiation. JTissue Eng 2010, 2010:120623.
19. Biggs M.J.P., Richards R.G., Dalby M.J. Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions. Nanomedicine 2010, 6:619-633.
20. Kerschnitzki M., Wagermaier W., Roschger P., Seto J., Shahar R., Duda G.N., et al. The organization of the osteocyte network mirrors the extracellular matrix orientation in bone. JStruct Biol 2011, 173:303-311.
21. Isenberg B.C., Wong J.Y. Building structure into engineered tissues. Mater Today 2006, 9:54-60.
22. Kim H.N., Hong Y., Kim M.S., Kim S.M., Suh K.Y. Effect of orientation and density of nanotopography in dermal wound healing. Biomaterials 2012, 33:8782-8792.
23. Liliensiek S.J., Campbell S., Nealey P.F., Murphy C.J. The scale of substratum topographic features modulates proliferation of corneal epithelial cells and corneal fibroblasts. JBiomed Mater Res A 2006, 79:185-192.
24. Kim D.H., Lee H., Lee Y.K., Nam J.M., Levchenko A. Biomimetic nanopatterns asenabling tools for analysis and control of live cells. Adv Mater 2010, 22:4551-4566.
25. Cha C., Liechty W.B., Khademhosseini A., Peppas N.A. Designing biomaterials to direct stem cell fate. ACS Nano 2012, 6:9353-9358.
26. Kim J., Kim D.H., Lim K.T., Seonwoo H., Park S.H., Kim Y.R., et al. Charged nanomatrices as efficient platforms for modulating cell adhesion and shape. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2012, 18:913-923.
27. Kim J., Kim Y.R., Kim Y., Lim K.T., Seonwoo H., Park S., et al. Graphene-incorporated chitosan substrata for adhesion and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. JMater Chem B 2013, 1:933-938.
28. Bettinger C.J., Langer R., Borenstein J.T. Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2009, 48:5406-5415.
29. Yim E.K., Pang S.W., Leong K.W. Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage. Exp Cell Res 2007, 313:1820-1829.
30. Chen W., Villa-Diaz L.G., Sun Y., Weng S., Kim J.K., Lam R.H., et al. Nanotopography influences adhesion, spreading, and self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells. ACS Nano 2012, 6:4094-4103.
31. Park J., Bauer S., von der Mark K., Schmuki P. Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett 2007, 7:1686-1691.
32. Mahdavi A., Ferreira L., Sundback C., Nichol J.W., Chan E.P., Carter D.J.D., et al. Abiodegradable and biocompatible gecko-inspired tissue adhesive. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:2307-2312.
33. Xie J., Willerth S.M., Li X., Macewan M.R., Rader A., Sakiyama-Elbert S.E., et al. The differentiation of embryonic stem cells seeded on electrospun nanofibers into neural lineages. Biomaterials 2009, 30:354-362.
34. Dolatshahi-Pirouz A., Nikkhah M., Kolind K., Dokmeci M., Khademhosseini A. Micro- and nanoengineering approaches to control stem cell-biomaterial interactions. JFunct Biomater 2011, 2:88-106.
35. McMurray R.J., Gadegaard N., Tsimbouri P.M., Burgess K.V., McNamara L.E., Tare R., et al. Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. Nat Mater 2011, 10:637-644.
36. Wein F., Bruinink A. Human triple cell co-culture for evaluation of bone implant materials. Integr Biol 2013, 5:703-711.
37. Chalut K.J., Kulangara K., Giacomelli M.G., Wax A., Leong K.W. Deformation ofstem cell nuclei by nanotopographical cues. Soft Matter 2010, 6:1675-1681.
38. McBeath R., Pirone D.M., Nelson C.M., Bhadriraju K., Chen C.S. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004, 6:483-495.
39. Kirmizidis G., Birch M.A. Microfabricated grooved substrates influence cell-cell communication and osteoblast differentiation invitro. Tissue Eng Part A 2009, 15:1427-1436.
40. Grellier M., Bordenave L., Amedee J. Cell-to-cell communication between osteogenic and endothelial lineages: implications for tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 2009, 27:562-571.