Experimental study of potential wellbore cement carbonation by various phases of carbon dioxide during geologic carbon sequestration

Applied Geochemistry

Volumn 35, Issue , 2013, Pages 161-172

  Jung, Hun Bok ^a   Um, Wooyong ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBONATION REACTIONS; CEMENT DEGRADATIONS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; GEOCHEMICAL MODELING; GEOLOGIC CARBON SEQUESTRATIONS; GEOLOGIC CARBON STORAGES; SYNTHETIC GROUNDWATER; X RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

CALCIUM CARBONATE; CARBON CAPTURE; CARBONATION; ENERGY DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY; FORESTRY; GROUNDWATER; HYDRATION; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); OIL FIELD EQUIPMENT; PORTLAND CEMENT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CALCITE; CALCIUM; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GROUNDWATER; HETEROGENEITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; SATURATION;

EID: 84880506891     PISSN: 08832927     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. 2 leakage through well cements at reservoir conditions. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2009, 3:494-501.
2. Barlet-Gouédard, V., Rimmelé, G., Goffé, B., Porcherie, O., 2006. Mitigation strategies for the risk of CO2 migration through wellbores. In: Proc. IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, February 21-23, Miami, FL.
3. 2 in deep saline aquifers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:240A-245A.
4. 2 exposure from the SACROC Unit, West Texas, USA. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1:75-85.
5. 2 producer. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:186-197.
6. Duguid A., Scherer G.W. Degradation of oilwell cement due to exposure to carbonated brine. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:546-560.
7. 2. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004, 112:193-205.
8. Gasda S.E., Bachu S., Celia M.A. Spatial characterization of the location of potentially leaky wells penetrating a deep saline aquifer in a mature sedimentary basin. Environ. Geol. 2004, 46:707-720.
9. Hansen J., Johnson D., Lacis A., Lebedeff S., Lee P., Rind D., Russell G. Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon-dioxide. Science 1981, 213:957-966.
10. Haselbach L.M., Ma S.G. Potential for carbon adsorption on concrete: surface XPS analyses. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:5329-5334.
11. Huntzinger D.N., Gierke J.S., Kawatra S.K., Eisele T.C., Sutter L.L. Carbon dioxide sequestration in cement kiln dust through mineral carbonation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:1986-1992.
12. Jung H.B., Jansik D., Um W. Imaging wellbore cement degradation by carbon dioxide under geologic sequestration conditions using X-ray computed microtomography. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:283-289.
13. 2 under geologic sequestration conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:4787-4792.
14. 2 reaction with hydrated class H well cement under geologic sequestration conditions: effects of flyash admixtures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:3947-3952.
15. 2 attack on hydrated class H well cement under geologic sequestration conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:6237-6242.
16. 2. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:1081-1092.
17. Lea F.M. The Chemistry of Cement and Concrete 1970, Edward Arnold Ltd., London.
18. 2-NaCl system from 0 to 250 °C, from 0 to 1000 bar, and from 0 to 5 molality of NaCl. Chem. Geol. 2007, 244:730-751.
19. 2. Chem. Geol. 2011, 281:195-210.
20. 2 geosequestration on overlying freshwater aquifers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:9225-9232.
21. 2. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:6204-6210.
22. Nelson E.B., Guillot D. Well Cementing 2006, Schlumberger, Sugar Land, TX, USA. second ed.
23. Neville A.M. Properties of Concrete 2004, John Wiley and Sons, New York. fourth ed.
24. Newell D.L., Carey J.W. Experimental evaluation of wellbore integrity along the cement-rock boundary. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:276-282.
25. 2 Sequestration Project (WASP) 2010, Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy (ISEEE), Calgary.
26. Parkhurst, D.L., Appelo, C.A.J., 1999. User's Guide to PHREEQC (Version 2)-A Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-Reaction, One-Dimensional Transport, and Inverse Geochemical Calculations. US Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep. 99-4259.
27. 2 injection into saline aquifers: 1. Effects of solids precipitation and their mitigation. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45:W03402. http://dx.doi.org/03410.01029/02008WR007101.
28. 2. Chem. Geol. 2009, 265:113-121.
29. 2-rich fluids. Cem. Concr. Res. 2008, 38:1038-1048.
30. 2: an in situ high pressure X-ray diffraction study. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2011, 75:7458-7471.
31. 2 Caputer Project Technical Results 2005, 827-848. Elsevier, Amsterdam. D. Thomas, S. Benson (Eds.).
32. 2. I. Assessment and calculation of mutual solubilities from 12 to 100 °C and up to 600 bar. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2003, 67:3015-3031.
33. Um W., Jung H.B., Martin P.F., McGrail B.P. Effective Permeability Change in Wellbore Cement with Carbon Dioxide Reaction. PNNL-20843 2011, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.
34. 2 sequestration on fractured wellbore cement at the cement/caprock interface. Chem. Geol. 2009, 265:122-133.
35. Wilkin R.T., Digiulio D.C. Geochemical impacts to groundwater from geologic carbon sequestration: controls on pH and inorganic carbon concentrations from reaction path and kinetic modeling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:4821-4827.
36. 2 into deep saline carbonate formations: predictions from geochemical modeling. SPE J. 2011, 16:959-967.
37. 2 geological storage: what do we know?. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:826-840.