Linking human activity and ecosystem condition to inform marine ecosystem based management

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 506-514

  Menzel, Susanne ^a   Kappel, Carrie V ^b   Broitman, Bernardo R ^c   Micheli, Fiorenza ^d   Rosenberg, Andrew A ^e  

^a SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DEL NORTE   (Chile)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS   (United States)

Author keywords

California; Ecological indicators; Ecological production function; Ecosystem services; Human benefits from ecosystems; Kelp forest ecosystem; Monterey Bay; Natural resource management; Scuba diving

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ECOSYSTEM APPROACH; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; HUMAN ACTIVITY; INTEGRATED APPROACH; KELP FOREST; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; NATURAL RESOURCE; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SCUBA DIVING; TRADE-OFF;

CALIFORNIA; MONTEREY BAY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84880506208     PISSN: 10527613     EISSN: 10990755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.2365     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arkema KK, Abramson SC, Dewsbury BM. 2006. Marine ecosystem-based management: from characterization to implementation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 525-532.
2. Brander LM, Van Beukering P, Cesar, HSJ. 2007. The recreational value of coral reefs: a meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 63: 209-218.
3. Chapman DS, Termansen M, Quinn CH, Jin NL, Bonn A, Cornell SJ, Fraser EDG, Hubacek K, Kunin WE, Reed MS. 2009. Modelling the coupled dynamics of moorland management and upland vegetation. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 278-288.
4. CRANE [Cooperative Research Assessment of Nearshore Ecosystems Program]. 2004. Compilation and analysis of Coastal Impact Assistance Program (CIAP) nearshore survey data. Available: www.dfg.ca.gov/marine/fir/crane.asp [February 14, 2013]
5. Daily GC. 1997. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press: Washington, DC.
6. Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 21-28. (Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/080025)
7. de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41: 393-408.
8. Donnellan MD. 2004. Spatial and temporal variability of kelp forest canopies in central California. Master of Science Dissertation, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories and the Department of Marine Science, San Jose State University, California, USA.
9. Executive Order 13547-Stewardship of the oceans, our coasts, and the Great Lakes. 2010. Federal Register 75, No. 140: 43023 (July 22, 2010); (Available from: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-07-22/pdf/2010-18169.pdf)
10. Farber S, Costanza R, Childers DL, Erickson J, Gross K, Grove M, Hopkinson CS, Kahn J, Pincetl S, Troy A, et al. 2006. Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. Bioscience 56: 121-133.
11. Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 68: 643-653.
12. Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B. 2002. Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31: 437-440.
13. Freeman AM. 1995. The benefits of water quality improvements for marine recreation: a review of the empirical evidence. Marine Resource Economics 10: 385-406.
14. Graham MH, Vásquez JA, Buschmann AH. 2007. Global ecology of the giant kelp Macrosystis: from ecotypes to ecosystems. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 45: 9-88.
15. Guo ZW, Xiao XM, Li DM. 2000. An assessment of ecosystem services: water flow regulation and hydroelectric power production. Ecological Applications 10: 925-936.
16. Hamilton SL, Caselle JE, Malone DP, Carr MH. 2010. Incorporating biogeography into evaluations of the Channel Islands marine reserve network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 18272-18277.
17. Kildow J, Cogan CS. 2005. California's Ocean Economy. National Ocean Economics Program's Report to the Resources Agency, State of California.
18. Koch EW, Barbier EB, Silliman BR, Reed DJ, Perillo GME, Hacker SD, Granek EF, Primavera JH, Muthiga N, Polasky S, et al. 2009. Non-linearity in ecosystem services: temporal and spatial variability in coastal protection. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 29-37.
19. Lafferty KD. 2004. Fishing for lobsters indirectly increases epidemics in sea urchins. Ecological Applications 14: 1566-1573.
20. Maritime Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). 2008. Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council; (Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:164:0019:0040:EN:PDF)
21. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: a Framework for Assessment. Island Press: Washington, DC.
22. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press: Washington, DC.
23. Murawski SA, Brown R, Lai HL, Rago PJ, Hendrickson L. 2000. Large-scale closed areas as a fishery management tool in temperate marine systems: the Georges Bank experience. Bulletin of Marine Science 66: 775-798.
24. Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron R, Chan KM, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, et al. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 4-11.
25. Nunneri C, Windhorst W, Turner KR, Lenhart H. 2007. Nutrient emission reduction scenarios in the North Sea: an abatement cost and ecosystem integrity analysis. Ecological Indicators 7: 776-792.
26. Pauly D. 1995. Anecdotes and the shifting base-line syndrome of fisheries. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10: 430-430.
27. Pew Oceans Commission (POC). 2003. America's living oceans: charting a course for sea change. (Available from: http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Protecting_ocean_life/env_pew_oceans_final_report.pdf) [9 July 2010]
28. PISCO. 2010. (Available from: http://www.piscoweb.org) [9 July 2010]
29. Richards DV, Kushner D. 1994. Kelp forest monitoring, 1992 annual report. Technical Report CHIS-94-01. Channel Islands National Park, Ventura, CA.
30. Rosenberg AA. 2003. Managing to the margins: the overexploitation of fisheries. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 102-106.
31. Ruckelshaus M, Klinger T, Knowlton N, Demaster DR. 2008. Marine ecosystem-based management in practice: Scientific and governance challenges. Bioscience 58: 53-63.
32. Rudd MA, Tupper MH. 2002. The impact of Nassau grouper size and abundance on scuba diver site selection and MPA economics. Coastal Management 30: 133-151.
33. Shivlani MP, Suman DO. 2000. Dive operator use patterns in the designated no-take zones of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS). Environmental Management 25: 647-659.
34. Soderqvist T, Eggert H, Olsson B, Soutukorva A. 2005. Economic valuation for sustainable development in the Swedish coastal zone. Ambio 34: 169-175.
35. Steneck RS, Graham MH, Bourque BJ, Corbett D, Erlandson JM, Estes JA, Tegner MJ. 2002. Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity stability resilience and future. Environmental Conservation 29: 436-459.
36. Tallis H, Polasky S. 2009. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1162: 265-283.
37. st century. Final Report of the US Commission on Ocean Policy to the President and Congress. (Available from: http://www.oceancommission.gov) [9 July 2010]
38. Wielgus J, Chadwick-Furman NE, Dubinsky Z, Shechter M, Zeitouni N. 2002. Dose-response modeling of recreationally important coral reef attributes: a review and potential application to the economic valuation of damage. Coral Reefs 21: 253-259.
39. Wielgus J, Chadwick-Furman NE, Zeitouni N, Shechter M. 2003. Effects of coral reef attribute damage on recreational welfare. Marine Resource Economics 18: 225-237.