Considerations for the treatment of computerized procedures in human reliability analysis

8th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies 2012, NPIC and HMIT 2012: Enabling the Future of Nuclear Energy

Volumn 3, Issue , 2012, Pages 1476-1487

  Boring, Ronald L ^a   Gertman, David I ^a  

^a IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computerized procedures; Human reliability analysis; Methods

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED CONTROL; COMPUTERIZED PROCEDURES; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; MAIN CONTROL ROOM; METHODS; NEW PLANTS;

MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; RECORDS MANAGEMENT;

RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84880495213     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. IEEE (2009). Human Factors Guide for Applications of Computerized Operating Procedure Systems at Nuclear Power Generating Stations and other Nuclear Facilities (Draft Guideline 1786, 9/30/09 version). New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
2. EPRI. (2010). Computerized Procedure Systems: Guidance on Design, Implementation and Use of Computerized Procedure Systems, Associated Automation and Soft Controls, TR-1015313. Palo Alto: Electric Power Research Institute.
3. Le Blanc, K., Gertman, D., Boring, R., Hugo, J., and Xing, J. (2011). Human Factors Guidance for the Assessment of Computerized Procedures, INL/EXT-10-19155. Idaho Falls: Idaho National Laboratory.
4. Forester, J., Kolaczkowski, A., Lois, E., & Kelly, D. (2006). Evaluation of Human Reliability Analysis Methods Against Good Practices, Final Report, NUREG-1842. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
5. Le Bot, P. (2003). Methodological validation of MERMOS by 160 analyses. In: Proceedings of the International workshop building the new HRA: errors of commission from research to application. NEA/CSNI/R(2002)3. OECD: Issy-les-Moulineaux.
6. Seung, W.L., Ha, J.S., & Seong, P.H. (2010). Development of an HRA Method based on Human Factor Issues for Advanced NPP. In Proceedings of the Seventh American Nuclear Society International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human-Machine Interface Technologies NPIC&HMIT 2010, Las Vegas, Nevada.
7. EPRI. (1992). An Approach to the Analysis of Operator Actions in Probabilistic Risk Assessment, TR-100259. Palo Alto: Electric Power Research Institute.
8. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2000). Technical Basis and Implementation Guidelines for A Technique for Human Event Analysis (ATHEANA), NUREG-1624, Rev. 1. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
9. Swain, A.D., & Guttman, H.E. (1983). Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications, NUREG/CR-1278. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
10. Swain, A.D. (1987). Accident Sequence Evaluation Program Human Reliability Analysis Procedure, NUREG/CR-4772. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
11. Gertman, D., Blackman, H., Marble, J., Byers, J., & Smith, C. (2005). The SPAR-H Human Reliability Analysis Method, NUREG/CR-6883. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
12. Forester, J., Kolaczkowski, A., Cooper, S., Bley, D., & Lois, E. (2007). ATHEANA User's Guide, NUREG-1880. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
13. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission/Electrical Power Research Institute. (2009). EPR1/NRC-RES Fire Human Reliability Analysis Guidelines, Draft Report, NUREG-1921. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.