Identifying Issue Frames in Text

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2013, Pages

  Sagi, Eyal ^a   Diermeier, Daniel ^a   Kaufmann, Stefan ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONCEPT ANALYSIS; CORPUS ANALYSIS; FEAR; FRAMING; LINGUISTICS; UNITED STATES; WAR;

ABORTION, INDUCED; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PUBLIC OPINION; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84880471167     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069185     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Plous S, (1993) The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill. 302pp.
2. Tversky A, Kahneman D, (1981) The Framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453-458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683. PubMed: 7455683.
3. Schattschneider EE, (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press. 147pp.
4. Lakoff G, (2004) Don't Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate: The Essential Guide for Progressives. White River Jct. VT: Chelsea Green Publishing. 144pp.
5. Chong D, Druckman JN, (2007) Framing Theory. Annu Rev Pol Sci 10: 103-126. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054.
6. Baumgartner FR, De Boef SL, Boydstun AE, (2008) The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Druckman JN, Jacobs LR, (2009) Presidential Responsiveness to Public Opinion. In: Edwards GC III, William G, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. pp. 160-181.
8. Shapiro RY, (2011) Public Opinion and Democracy. Public Opin Q 75: 982-1017. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr053.
9. Baumgartner FR, Jones BD, (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 298pp.
10. Baumgartner FR, Jones BD, (2002) Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 360pp.
11. Monroe BL, Schrodt PA, (2008) Introduction to the Special Issue: The Analysis of Political Text. Polit Anal 16: 351-355. doi:10.1093/pan/mpn017.
12. Quinn KM, Monroe BL, Colaresi M, Crespin MH, Radev DR, (2010) How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs. Am J Pol Sci 54: 209-228. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00427.x.
13. Yu B, Kaufmann S, Diermeier D, (2008) Classifying party affiliation from political speech. J Info Technol Politics 5: 33-48. doi:10.1080/19331680802149608.
14. Yu B, Diermeier D, Kaufmann S, Godbout JF, (2012) Language and Ideology in Congress. Br J Polit Sci 42: 31-55. doi:10.1017/S0007123411000160.
15. Firth J, (1957) Papers in Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press. 233pp. pp. pp. 1934-1951. PubMed: 13503560.
16. Deerwester S, Dumais ST, Furnas GW, Landauer TK, Harshman R, (1990) Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci 41: 391-407. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6.
17. Landauer TK, Dumais ST, (1997) A solution to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychol Rev 104: 211-240. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211.
18. Schütze H, (1997) Ambiguity in language learning: computational and cognitive models. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 176pp.
19. Levin E, Sharifi M, Ball J, (2006) Evaluation of utility of LSA for word sense discrimination. In: Moore RC, Bilmes JA, Chu-Carroll JC, Sanderson M, eds. In: Proceedings of the; (2006) Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Companion Volume: Short Papers. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. pp. 77-80.
20. Schütze H, (1998) Automatic word sense discrimination. Comput Linguist 24: 97-124.
21. Marcu D, (2003) Automatic Abstracting. In: Darke MA, eds. Encyclopedia of Library and Information. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. pp. 245-256.
22. Riedel E, Dexter SL, Scharber C, Doering A, (2006) Experimental Evidence on the Effectiveness of Automated Essay Scoring in Teacher Education Cases. J Educ Comput Res 35: 267-287. doi:10.2190/U552-M54Q-5771-M677.
23. Sagi E, Kaufmann S, Clark B, (2009) Semantic Density Analysis: Comparing Word Meaning across Time and Phonetic Space. In: Basili R, Pennacchiotti M, eds. In: Proceedings of the EACL 2009 Workshop on Gems: Geometrical Models of Natural Language Semantics: Stroudsburg, PA. Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. pp. 104-111.
24. Iyengar S, Kinder DR, (1987) News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Takayama Y, Flournoy R, Kaufmann S, (1998) Information Mapping: Concept-Based Information Retrieval Based on Word Associations. 8. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. p.A paragraph return was deleted.
26. Sandhaus E, (2008) The New York: Times Publishing House Annotated Corpus. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. Available: http://www.ldc.upenn.edu/Catalog/catalogEntry.jsp?catalogId=LDC2008T19. Accessed 20 January 2013.
27. Infomap, (2007). Computer Software. Stanford, CA: Available. http://infomap-nlp.sourceforge.net/. Accessed: 20 January 2013.
28. Hu X, Cai Z, Wiemer-Hastings P, Graesser A, McNamara D, (2007) Strength, Limitations, and Extensions of LSA. In: Landauer TK, McNamara D, Dennis S, Kintsch W, eds. The Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. pp. 401-426.
29. Lakoff G, (2008) he political mind: Why you can't understand 21st-century politics with an 18th-century brain. New York: Viking Publishing House. 292pp.
30. Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM, (2010) What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from US Daily Newspapers. Econometrica 78: 35-71. doi:10.3982/ECTA7195.
31. Wickham H, (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer Verlag.