KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION TO OVERCOME ONTOLOGICAL HETEROGENEITY: CHALLENGES FROM FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 183-194

  Firat, Aykut ^a   Madnick, Stuart ^a   Grosof, Benjamin ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Database integration; ontologies; Semantic Web; source selection

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; CONSTRAINT PROGRAMMING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; INTEGRATION; INTEROPERABILITY; SEMANTIC WEB; WEB SERVICES;

DATABASES INTEGRATIONS; FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GLOBAL NETWORKING; HETEROGENEOUS INFORMATION; KEY TECHNOLOGIES; KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION; ONTOLOGY'S; SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY; SEMANTIC-WEB; SOURCE SELECTION;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 84880458366     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Baral, C., and Gelfond, M. “Logic Programming and Knowledge Representation,” Journal of Logic Programming (19), 1994, pp. 74-148.
2. Batini, C., Lenzerin, M., and Navathe, S. B. “A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Database Schema Integration,” ACM Computing Surveys (18), December 1986, pp. 323-364.
3. Berners-Lee T, Hendler, J., and Lassila, O. “The Semantic Web,” Scientific American (284:5), 2001, pp. 34-43.
4. Dobbie, G., and Topor, R. “On the Declarative and Procedural Semantics of Deductive Object-Oriented Systems,” Journal of Intelligent Information Systems (4), 1995, pp. 193-219.
5. Duschka, O. M. “Query Planning and Optimization in Information Integration,” STAN-CS-TR-97-1598, Stanford University Computer Science Technical Report, Stanford, CA, 1997.
6. Goh, C. H., Bressan, S., Madnick, S., and Siegel, M. “Context Interchange: New Features and Formalisms for the Intelligent Integration of Information,” ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems (17:3), 1999, pp. 270-293.
7. Kakas, A. C., Kowalski, R. A., and Toni, F. “Abductive Logic Programming,” Journal of Logic and Computation (2:6), 1993, pp. 719-770.
8. Kifer, M., Lausen, G., and Wu, J. “Logical Foundations of Object-Oriented and Frame-Based Languages,” Journal of the ACM (4), 1995, pp. 741-843.
9. Levy, A. Y. “Logic-Based Techniques in Data Integration,” in J. Minker (ed.), Logic Based Artificial Intelligence. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, pp. 575-595.
10. Levy, A., Rajaraman, A, and Ordille, J. “Querying Heterogeneous Information Sources Using Source Descriptions,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference on Very Large Databases, Los Altos, CA, 1996, pp. 252-262.
11. Madnick, S. “The Misguided Silver Bullet: What XML Will and Will NOT Do to Help Information Integration,” in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Integration and Web-Based Applications and Services, Linz, Austria, 2001, pp. 61-72.
12. Mihaila, G., Raschid, L., and Vidal., M. E. “Source Selection and Ranking in the WebSemantics Architecture Using Quality of Data Metadata,” Advances in Computers (55), 2001, pp. 87-118.
13. Pottinger R., and Halevy, A. Y. “MiniCon: A Scalable Algorithm for Answering Queries Using Views,” VLDB Journal (10), 2001, pp. 182-198.
14. Reeves, D. M., Wellman, M. P., and Grosof, B. N. “Automated Negotiation from Declarative Contract Descriptions,” in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2001, pp. 51-58.
15. Ullman, J. D. “Information Integration Using Logical Views,” in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Database Theory, Delphi, Greece, 1997, pp. 19–40.