Dear enemies and nasty neighbors in crayfish: Effects of social status and sex on responses to familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 99, Issue , 2013, Pages 47-51

  Tierney, A J ^a   Andrews, K ^a   Happer, K R ^a   White, M K M ^a  

^a Assistant Professor in the University Libraries   (United States)

Author keywords

Aggression; Conspecific recognition; Crayfish; Crustacean; Dear enemy

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AGGRESSION; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; CRAYFISH; DOMINANCE; NATURAL ENEMY; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL STATUS;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FIGHTING; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; NONHUMAN; PROCAMBARUS CLARKII; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL STATUS; AGGRESSION; ANIMAL; ASSOCIATION; CRAYFISH; MOTIVATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; RECOGNITION; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

FRANCE; ILE DE FRANCE; PARIS; VILLE DE PARIS;

AGGRESSION; ANIMALS; ASTACOIDEA; CUES; DOMINANCE-SUBORDINATION; FEMALE; HIERARCHY, SOCIAL; MALE; MOTIVATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 84880435031     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: 18728308     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aquiloni L., Goncalves V., Inghilesi A.F., Gherardi F. Who's what? Prompt recognition of social status in crayfish. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2012, 66:785-790.
2. Bergman D.A., Moore P.A. Field observations of intraspecific agonistic behavior of two crayfish species, Orconectes rusticus and Orconectes virilis, in different habitats. Biol. Bull. 2003, 205:26-35.
3. Bergman D.A., Kozlowski C.P., McIntyre J.C., Huber R., Daws A.G., Moore P.A. Temporal dynamics and communication of winner-effects in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Behaviour 2003, 140:805-825.
4. Booksmythe I., Jennions M.D., Backwell P.R.Y. Investigating the 'dear enemy' phenomenon in the territory defense of the fiddler crab, Uca mjoebergi. Anim. Behav. 2010, 79:419-423.
5. Briefer E., Aubin T., Lehongre K., Rybak F. How to identify dear enemies: the group signature in the complex song of the skylark Alauda arvensis. J. Exp. Biol. 2008, 211:317-326.
6. Davis K.M., Huber R. Activity patterns, behavioural repertoires, and agonistic interactions of crayfish: a non-manipulative field study. Behaviour 2007, 144:229-247.
7. Daws A.G., Grills J., Konzen K., Moore P.A. Previous experiences alter the outcome of aggressive interactions between males in the crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. Mar. Fresh. Behav. Physiol. 2002, 35:139-148.
8. Detto T., Backwell P.R.Y., Hemmi J.M., Zeil J. Visually mediated species and neighbour recognition in fiddler crabs (Uca mjoebergi and Uca capricomis). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2006, 273:1661-1666.
9. Figler M.H., Blank G.S., Peeke H.V.S. Maternal territoriality as an offspring defense strategy in red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii, Girard). Aggressive Behav. 2001, 27:391-403.
10. Frostman P., Sherman P.T. Behavioral response to familiar and unfamiliar neighbors in a territorial cichlid, Neolamprologus pulcher. Ichthyol. Res. 2004, 51:283-285.
11. Gherardi F., Daniels W.H. Dominance hierarchies and status recognition in the crayfish Procambarus acutus acutus. Can. J. Zool. 2003, 81:1269-1281.
12. Gherardi F., Barbaresi S., Salvi G. Spatial and temporal patterns in the movement of Procambarus clarkii, an invasive crayfish. Aquat. Sci. 2000, 62:179-193.
13. Gherardi F., Tricarico E., Ilheu M. Movement patterns of an invasive crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, in a temporary stream of southern Portugal. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 2002, 14:183-197.
14. Gherardi F., Aquiloni L., Tricarico E. Revisiting social recognition systems in invertebrates. Anim. Cogn. 2012, 15:745-762.
15. Heinze J., Foitzik S., Hippert A., Holldobler B. Apparent dear-enemy phenomenon and environment-based recognition cues in the ant Leptothorax nylanderi. Ethology 1996, 102:510-522.
16. Hsu Y., Earley R.L., Wolf L.L. Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biol. Rev. 2006, 81:33-74.
17. Knaden M., Wehner R. Nest defense and conspecific enemy recognition in the desert ant Cataglyphis fortis. J. Insect Behav. 2003, 16:717-730.
18. Martin A.L., Moore P.A. Field observations of agonism in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus: shelter use in a natural environment. Ethology 2007, 113:1192-1201.
19. Newey P.S., Robson S.K.A., Crozier R.H. Weaver ants Oecophylla smaragdina encounter nasty neighbors rather than dear enemies. Ecology 2010, 91:2366-2372.
20. Pratt A.E., McLain D.K. How dear is my enemy: intruder-resident and resident-resident encounters in male sand fiddler crabs (Uca pugilator). Behaviour 2006, 143:597-617.
21. Rufino M.M., Jones D.A. Binary individual recognition in Lysmata debelius (Decapoda: Hippolytidae) under laboratory conditions. J. Crust. Biol. 2001, 21:388-392.
22. Schradin C., Schneider C., Lindholm A.K. The nasty neighbour in the striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) steals paternity and elicits aggression. Front. Zool. 2010, 7:e19.
23. Skog M. Intersexual differences in European lobster (Homarus gammarus): recognition mechanisms and agonistic behaviours. Behaviour 2009, 146:1071-1091.
24. Temeles E.J. The role of neighbors in territorial systems: when are they 'dear enemies'?. Anim. Behav. 1994, 47:339-350.
25. Van der Velden J., Zheng Y., Patullo B.W., Macmillan D.L. Crayfish recognize the faces of fight opponents. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e1695.
26. Ward J., Saleh N., Dunham D.W., Rahman N. Individual discrimination in the big-clawed snapping shrimp, Alpheus heterochelis. Mar. Fresh. Behav. Physiol. 2004, 37:35-42.
27. Ydenberg R.C., Giraldeau L.A., Falls J.B. Neighbours, strangers, and the asymmetric war of attrition. Anim. Behav. 1988, 36:343-347.
28. Zenuto R.R. Dear enemy relationships in the subterranean rodent Ctenomys talarum: the role of memory of familiar odours. Anim. Behav. 2010, 79:1247-1255.
29. Zulandt Schneider R.A., Huber R., Moore P.A. Individual and status recognition in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus: the effects of urine release on fight dynamics. Behaviour 2001, 138:137-153.