Conditions for learning from animations

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn , Issue PART 2, 2008, Pages 438-445

  Van Oostendorp, Herre ^a   Beijersbergen, Michiel J ^a   Solaimani, Sam ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMATED DIAGRAMS; INTERACTIVE ANIMATIONS; INTERACTIVITY; SPATIAL ABILITIES;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

ANIMATION;

EID: 84880432767     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Awan, R. N., & Stevens, B. (2005). Static/Animated Diagrams and their Effect on Students Perceptions of Conceptual Understanding in Computer Aided Learning (CAL) Environments. Proceedings Human Computer Interaction 2005. London: Springer-Verlag.
2. Betrancourt, M., Dillenbourg, P., & Clavien, L. (2003). Reducing cognitive load in learning from animation: Impact of delivery features. EARLI 2003 symposium Comprehension Processes in Learning with Animation. Padua, Italy.
3. Brunken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 53-61.
4. ChanLin, L. (1998). Students' cognitive styles and the need of visual control in animation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19, 353-385
5. Grant, E.R., & Spivey, M.J. (2003). Eye movements and problem solving: guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science, 14, 462-466.
6. Hegarty, M. (2004). Dynamic visualizations and learning: Getting to the difficult questions. Learning and Instruction, 14, 343-352.
7. Hegarty, M., Narayanan, N. H., & Freitas, P. (2002). Understanding machines from multimedia and hypermedia presentations. In J. Otero, J.A. Leon & A. Graesser (Eds.), The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension (pp. 357-384). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 325-360.
9. Kim, S., Yoon, M., Whang, S-M., Tversky, B., & Morrison, J. B. (2007). The effect of animation on comprehension and interest. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 260-270.
10. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of the Psychology of Education, 14, 225-244.
12. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an Aid to Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 87-99.
14. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43-52.
15. Mayer, R.E., & Sims, V.K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389-401.
16. Morrison, J.B., & Tversky, B. (2001). The (In) effectiveness of animation in instruction. In J. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), CHI 2001: Extended Abstracts (pp. 377-378). Danvers, MA: ACM Press.
17. Narayanan, N.H., & Hegarty, M. (2002). Multimedia design for communication of dynamic information. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 279-315.
18. Paas, G. W. C. (1993). Instructional control of cognitive load in training of complex cognitive tasks. Dissertation Technical University Twente, The Netherlands.
19. Reed, S. K. (2006). Cognitive Architectures for Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 41, 87-98.
20. Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521-562.
21. Schnotz, W. (2001). Sign systems, technologies, and the acquisition of knowledge. In J.F. Rouet, J. Levonen & A. Biardeau (Eds.), Multimedia Learning: Cognitive and Instructional Issues (pp. 9-29). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2005). Enabling, facilitating and inhibiting effects of animations in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53, 47-58.
23. Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14, 293-305.
24. Smallman, H.S., & St. John, M. (2005). Naïve realism: misplaced faith in realistic displays. Ergonomics in Design, 13, 14-19.
25. Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185-233.
26. Thurstone, L. L., & Thurstone, T. G. (1941). Factorial studies of intelligence. Psychometric Monographs 2.
27. Tversky, B., Morrison, B. J., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 1-16.
28. Van Oostendorp, H., & Beijersbergen, M.J. (2007). Animated diagrams: their effect on understanding, confidence and mental effort. Proceedings 12th EARLI Conference. Budapest, Hungary.
29. Wouters, P., Tabbers, H.K., & Paas, F. (2007). Interactivity in Video-based Models. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 327-342.