Use of the ecosystem services concept in landscape management in the Netherlands

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 237-242

  van Wensem, Joke ^a  

^a Soil Protection Technical Committee   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Case study; Decision making; Ecosystem services; Landscape management; Stakeholder involvement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880419743     PISSN: 15513793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1391     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Brils J, Van der Meulen S. 2010. Sharing experiences with ecosystem services. [in Dutch] [cited 2012 July 12]. Available from: http://www.soilpedia.nl/Bikiwiki%20documenten/CoP%20Ecosysteemdiensten/Delen_ervaringen_ESD_finale%5b1%5d.pdf
2. Burkhard BF, Kroll F, Muller F, WindhorstW. 2009. Landscapes capacities to provide ecosystem services-A concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online 15: 1-22.
3. [CSUI] Consious Soil Use Initiative. 2012. Initiatief Bewust Bodemgebruik [in Dutch]. [cited 2012 July 24]. Available from: http://www.bewustbodemgebruik.nl
4. Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kaveira PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7: 21-18.
5. De Blaeij A, Verburg R. 2011. Voor-en nadelen van het gebruik van natuurpunten bij het bepalen en monitariseren van natuureffecten. Wageningen, the Netherlands: LEI. Nota 11-113 [in Dutch].
6. [EEA] European Environment Agency. 1994. CORINE land cover. [cited 2012 July 24]. Available from: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/COR0-landcover
7. [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2010. Scientific opinion on the development of specific protection goal options for environmental risk assessment of pesticides, in particular in relation to the revision of the Guidance Documents on Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecology (SANCO/3268/2001 and SANCO/10329/2002). EFSA J 8: 1821.
8. [ELN-FAB] European Learning Network on Functional AgroBiodiversity. 2012. [cited 2012 July 30]. Available from: http://www.eln-fab.eu
9. Faber JH. 2006. European experience on application of site-specific ecological risk assessment in terrestrial ecosystems. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 12: 1-39.
10. Faber JH, Van Wensem J. 2012. Elaborations on the use of the ecosystem services concept for the application in ecological risk assessment for soil. Sci Total Environ 415: 3-8.
11. Goldman RL, Tallis H, Kaveira P, Daily GC. 2008. Field evidence that ecosystem service projects support biodiversity and diversify options. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/cgl/doI/10.1071/pnas.0800208105
12. Hajer M. 2011. The energetic society. In search of a governance philosophy for a clean economy. Report No. 500070012. The Hague, the Netherlands: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
13. Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Washington, DC: Island Press; 948 p.
14. Hendriks K, Smit A, Spijker J, Melman D. 2010. Overzicht van beschikbare informatie bij posters Ecosysteemdiensten met Gras, Hout en Riet. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Alterra. Projectcode [BO,11,003,000] (in Dutch).
15. Huismans KGA, DeWit J, MuntjewerffR. 2011. Soil sealing in rural areas, a decision supportive instrument. Reference No. GM-0027410. Houten, the Netherlands: Grontmij.
16. [IenM] Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment. 2012. The triple-O approach. Ecosystem services in the practice of sustainable land management and regional development. [in Dutch] [cited 2012 July 24]. Available from: http://www.agentschapnl.nl/sites/default/files/bijlagen/Triple_O_aanpak_Ontdekken_%20Overeenkomen%20_Ontwikkelen.pdf
17. Koetse MJ, Rietveld P. 2010. Economische waardering van omgevingskwaliteit. [in Dutch] The Hague, the Netherlands: SDU uitgevers. 263 p.
18. Kontogianni A, LuckGW, Skourtos M. 2010. Valuing ecosystem services on the basis of service-providing units: A potential approach to address the 'endpoint problem' and improve stated preference methods. Ecol Econ 69: 1479-1487.
19. [NEN] Netherlands Normalisation Institute. 2010. Soil quality-Ecological risk analysis. [in Dutch] NEN 5737.
20. [OECD] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2011. Towards green growth-monitoring progress: OECD Indicators. [cited 2012 July 28]. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/document/49/0,3746,en_2649_37465_48033720_1_1_1_37465,00.html
21. [PN-NKG] Praktijk Netwerk Niet Kerende Grondbewerking. 2012. [in Dutch]. [cited 2012 July 30]. Available from: http://www.nietkerendegrondbewerking.nl/
22. Rutgers M, Van Wijnen HJ, Schouten AJ, Mulder C, Kuiten AM, Brussaard L, Breure AM. 2012. A method to assess ecosystem services developed from soil attributes with stakeholders and data of four arable farms. Sci Total Environ 415: 39-48.
23. Seppelt R, Fath B, Burkhard B, Fisher JL, Gret-Regamey A, Lautenbach S, Pert P, Hotes S, Spangenberg J, Verburg PH, et al. 2011. Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies. Ecol Indic 21: 145-154.
24. Sijtsma FJ, Dietz F, Kruitwagen S, Van Hinsbergen A. 2010. In: Koetse MJ, Rietveld P, editors. Economische waardering van omgevingskwaliteit. [in Dutch]. The Hague, the Netherlands: SDU uitgevers. 263 p.
25. SKB. 2012. Program for sustainable development of the subsurface [in Dutch]. [cited 2012 July 24]. Available from: http://www.skbodem.nl
26. Smit A, Verzandvoort S. 2012a. Doenderzoek [in Dutch]. [cited 2012 July 24]. Available from: http://prezi.com/5vsnnxj-ggki/doenderzoek/
27. Smit A, Verzandvoort S. 2012b. Doenderzoek [draft English version]. [cited 2012 November 6]. Available from: http://prezi.com/wjdahxerqoce/doenderzoek-en/?res_nr=5&sis=2719401128
28. Steingröver E, Opdam P, Van Rooij S, Grashof-Bokdam C, Van der Veen M. 2011. Ondernemen met landschapsdiensten. Hoe houtwallen, stadsparken en watergangen duurzaam kunnen bijdragen aan economie en leefomgeving. [in Dutch]. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Alterra. Report No. 2208.
29. TCB [Soil Protection Technical Committee]. 2003. Towards a more ecologically sustainable land use. Report No. A33. The Hague, the Netherlands: TCB.
30. TCB [Soil Protection Technical Committee]. 2012. Better decisions with ecosystem services. Report No. A073. [in Dutch]. The Hague, the Netherlands.
31. TEEB [The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity]. 2012. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in local and regional policy and management. Wittmer H, Gundimeda H, editors. Oxford, UK: Routledge. 384 p.
32. US Congress. 2012. Letter on ecosystem services to the assistant secretary of the Army Corps of Engineers and the Chief of the US Forest Service for April 18. Washington, DC.