Greenhouse gases and building lifetimes

Building and Environment

Volumn 68, Issue , 2013, Pages 77-86

  Mequignon, Marc ^a   Ait Haddou, Hassan ^b   Thellier, Françoise ^a   Bonhomme, Marion ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b INSTITUT CHARLES GERHARDT   (France)

^c Ecole Nationale Superieure d'Architecture de Toulouse   (France)

Author keywords

Building; Decision making; Design; Durability; Greenhouse gas; LCA; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

EMBODIED ENERGY; ENERGY PRICES; HEATING AND COOLING; IMPACT EVALUATION; LCA; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE LEVEL; TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS;

BUILDINGS; DECISION MAKING; DESIGN; DURABILITY; GAS EMISSIONS; HOUSING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; BUILDING; COOLING; DECISION MAKING; DURABILITY; EMISSION; GREENHOUSE GAS; HEATING; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 84880398983     PISSN: 03601323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.05.017     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aktas Can B., Bilec M. Impact of lifetime on US residential building LCA results. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2011, 17(3):337-349.
2. Horsch R.B., Fry J.E., Hoffmann N.L., Eichholtz D., Rogers S.G., Fraley R.T. Asimple and general method for transferring genes into plants 1985.
3. Junnila S., Horvart A., Guggemos A.A. Life-cycle assessment of office buildings in Europe and the United States. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2006, 12(1):10-17.
4. Häkkinen T., Ahola P., Vanhatalo L., Merra A. Environmental impact of coated exterior wooden cladding 1999, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland.
5. Adalberth K. Energy use and environmental impact of new residential buildings 2000, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Building Physics, Lund University.
6. Scheuer C., Keoleian G.A., Reppe P. Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications. Energy and Buildings 2003, 35(19):1049-1064.
7. Thormark C. The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building. Building and Environment 2006, 41(8):1019-1026.
8. Llewlly J., Edward S. Towards a framework for environmental assessment of building materials and components 1998, BRE.
9. Van Nunen H. Improved service life predictions for better life cycle assessments. Proc. SB11 world sustainable building conference 2011.
10. Thiers S., Peuportier B. Energy and environmental assessment of two high energy performance residential buildings. Building and Environment 2011, 51:276-284.
11. Van Ooteghem K., Xu L. The life-cycle assessment of a single-storey retail building in Canada. Building and Environment 2011, 49:212-226.
12. Sartori I., Hestnes A. Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: a review article. Energy and Buildings 2007, 39:249-257.
13. Mora P. Life cycle, sustainability and the transcendent quality of building materials. Building and Environment 2007, 42(3):1329-1334.
14. Werner F., Richter K. Wooden building products in comparative LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2011, 12(7):470-479.
15. Haapio A., Viitaniemi P. Environmental effect of structural solutions and building materials to a building. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2008, 28.
16. Wallhagen M., Glaumann M., Malmqvist T. Basic building life cycle calculations to decrease contribution to climate change - case study on an office building in Sweden. Building and Environment 2011, 46(10):1863-1871.
17. Van Nunen H. Assessment of the Sustainability of Flexible building. The improved factor method: service life prediction of buildings in the Netherlands, applied to life cycle assessment 2010, Eindhoven.
18. Kohler N. Long-term design, management and finance for the built environment. Building Research & Information 2008, 36(2):189-194. 10.1080/09613210701657533.
19. Babey N. Faut-il construire pour 30 ans? in Projections 2003, magazine de l'Association Ecoparc.
20. Rudbeck C. Methods for designing building envelope components prepared for repair and maintenance 1999, [Lyngby].
21. Liu M., Li B., Yao R. Ageneric model of exergy assessment for the environmental impact of building lifecycle. Energy and Buildings 2010, 42(9):1482-1490.
22. Pulselli R.M., Simoncini E., Bastianoni F. Emergy analysis of building manufacturing, maintenance and use: Em-building indices to evaluate housing sustainability. Energy and Buildings 2007, 39(5):620-628.
23. ISO 14040 Environmental management. Life cycle assessment: principles and framework 2006, International Standard Organisation, Geneva.
24. ISO 15686 1: Buildings service life planning, part 1: general principles 2000, International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland.
25. ISO 21930 Sustainability in building construction - environmental declaration of building products 2007.
26. ISO 14025 Environmental labels and declarations - type III environmental declarations - principles and procedures 2006.
27. Mequignon M. Comment la durée de vie des bâtiments peut-elle influencer les performances en termes de développement durable? 2012, PhD dissertation, University of Toulouse, France.
28. Maslow A. Motivation and personality 1954, Harper, New York.
29. Simon P. Architectures transformées: Réhabilitations et reconversions à Paris 1997, pavillon de l'Arsenal, Paris.
30. Latham A., Derek Creative re-use of buildings1 2001, Donhead, Shaftesbury, p. 256.
31. Afnor standard NF X50-150: Expression du besoin et cahier des charges fonctionnel - Élaboration et redaction.
32. Bretesch B. La Méthode APTE: analyse de la valeur, analyse fonctionnelle 2000, [Pétrelle].
33. NF P01-010 Qualité environnementale des produits de construction - Déclaration environnementale et sanitaire des produits de construction 2004.
34. Vial E., Cornillier C. Accounting for temporary biomass carbon storage in environmental, Labelling. International conference on carbon storage in wood products, Brussels 1 September 2009.
35. Talon A. Evaluation des scénarii de dégradation des produits de construction 2006, PhD thesis in Civil Engineering, Université Blaise Pascal II.
36. Bouchon-Meunier B., Marsala C. Logique floue, principes, aide à la décision 2003, Paris, Lavoisier.