A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 343-352

  Verhamme, Luc M ^a   Meijer, Gert J ^a   Boumans, Tiny ^b   de Haan, Anton F J ^a   Bergé, Stefaan J ^a   Maal, Thomas J J ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Medicim Nv   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cone beam CT; Implant placement; Implantology; Oral and maxillofacial surgery; Validation; Validation method; Virtual implant planning

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

COMPLETE DENTURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MAXILLA; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHETIC FITTING; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, COMPLETE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MAXILLA; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FITTING; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84880397139     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12112     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005; 25:113-119.
2. Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, etal. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24(Suppl):92-109.
3. Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. J Periodontol 2010; 81:43-51.
4. D'Haese J, Van De Velde T, Elaut L, De Bruyn H. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14:293-303.
5. Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. J Periodontol 2008; 79:1339-1345.
6. Pettersson A, Komiyama A, Hultin M, Nasstrom K, Klinge B. Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 14:527-537.
7. Vasak C, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Strbac G, Schemper M, Zechner W. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22:1157-1163.
8. Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Martens K, Marchal G, van Steenberghe D, Suetens P. An image-guided planning system for endosseous oral implants. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17:842-852.
9. Wouters V, Mollemans W, Schutyser F. Calibrated segmentation of CBCT and CT images for digitization of dental prostheses. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2011; 6:609-616.
10. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:571-577.
11. van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Andersson M, Brajnovic I, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Suetens P. A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17:663-670.
12. Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, Schutyser F, Berge SJ, Maal TJ. A clinically relevant validation method for implant placement after virtual planning. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012. Epub ahead of print.
13. Rupert GJ. Simultaneous statistical inference. New York: Springer, 1981.
14. Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. Guided implant placement and immediate prosthesis delivery using traditional Branemark System abutments: a pilot study of 23 patients. Implant Dent 2008; 17:128-135.
15. Komiyama A, Klinge B, Hultin M. Treatment outcome of immediately loaded implants installed in edentulous jaws following computer-assisted virtual treatment planning and flapless surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19:677-685.
16. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A. The use of computer-guided flapless implant surgery and four implants placed in immediate function to support a fixed denture: preliminary results after a mean follow-up period of thirteen months. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97:S26-S34.
17. Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128:803-811.
18. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106:106-114.
19. Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132:550-560.
20. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52:707-730.
21. Al-Harbi SA, Sun AY. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results. Implant Dent 2009; 18:46-56.
22. Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Piskin B, Ozdemir T. Conventional multi-slice Computed Tomography (CT) and Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) for computer-aided implant placement. Part II: reliability of mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012. Epub ahead of print.
23. de Velde TV, Glor F, Bruyn HD. A model study on flapless implant placement by clinicians with a different experience level in implant surgery. J Clin Oral Implant Res 2008; 19:66-72.
24. Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J Periodontol 2005; 76:503-507.
25. Dreiseidler T, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, etal. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning. J Clin Oral Implant Res 2009; 20:1191-1199.
26. Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67:394-401.
27. Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, etal. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34:816-821.
28. Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Jacobs R. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37:398-403.
29. Vrielinck L, Politis C, Schepers S, Pauwels M, Naert U. Image-based planning and clinical validation of zygoma and pterygoid implant placement in patients with severe bone atrophy using customized drill guides. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 32:7-14.
30. Widmann G, Zangerl A, Keiler M, Stoffner R, Bale R, Puelacher W. Flapless implant surgery in the edentulous jaw based on three fixed intraoral reference points and image-guided surgical templates: accuracy in human cadavers. J Clin Oral Implant Res 2010; 21:835-841.
31. Arataki T, Furuya Y, Ito T, Miyashita Y, Shimamura I, Yajima Y. Pre-operative drilling simulation method for dental implant treatment. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2007; 48:27-35.
32. Koop R, Vercruyssen M, Vermeulen K, Quirynen M. Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24:630-634.
33. Stumpel LJ. Deformation of stereolithographically produced surgical guides: an observational case series report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14:442-453.
34. Hamerschmidt R, Mocellin M, Gasperin AC, etal. Local anesthesia for cochlear implant surgery: a possible alternative. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 76:561-564.
35. Block MS, Chandler C. Computed tomography-guided surgery: complications associated with scanning, processing, surgery, and prosthetics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67:13-22.
36. Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery - a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:305-313.
37. Lal K, White GS, Morea DN, Wright RF. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept. J Prosthodont 2006; 15:51-58.
38. Van Assche N, Quirynen M. Tolerance within a surgical guide. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21:455-458.
39. Nada RM, Maal TJ, Breuning KH, Berge SJ, Mostafa YA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Accuracy and reproducibility of voxel based superimposition of cone beam computed tomography models on the anterior cranial base and the zygomatic arches. Plos One 2011; 6:e16520.
40. Platzer S, Bertha G, Heschl A, Wegscheider WA, Lorenzoni M. Three-dimensional accuracy of guided implant placement: indirect assessment of clinical outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011. Epub ahead of print.
41. Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24:234-242.