Long-lasting inhibitory semantic context effects on object naming are necessarily conceptually mediated: Implications for models of lexical-semantic encoding

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 228-256

  Belke, Eva ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Language production; Lexical retrieval; Semantic interference

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880397047     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abdel Rahman R., Melinger A. When bees hamper the production of honey: Lexical interference from associates in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:604-614.
2. Abdel Rahman R., Melinger A. Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes 2009, 24:713-734.
3. Abdel Rahman R., Melinger A. The dynamic microstructure of speech production: Semantic interference built on the fly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2011, 37:149-161.
4. Alario F.-X., del Prado Moscoso., Martín F. On the origin of the "cumulative semantic inhibition" effect. Memory & Cognition 2010, 38:57-66.
5. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., Gulikers L. The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM) 1995, Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
6. Belke E. Effects of working memory load on lexical-semantic encoding in language production. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2008, 15:357-363.
7. Belke, E. (2008b). Finding words for things: Lexical-semantic encoding in language production. Habilitation dissertation, University of Bielefeld.
8. Belke, E. & Stielow, A. (2013). Cumulative and non-cumulative semantic interference in object naming: Evidence from blocked and continuous manipulations of semantic context. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
9. Belke E., Brysbaert M., Meyer A.S., Ghyselinck M. Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: Evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis. Cognition 2005, 96:B45-B54.
10. Belke E., Meyer A.S., Damian M.F. Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2005, 58A:667-692.
11. Biegler K.A., Crowther J.E., Martin R.C. Consequences of an inhibition deficit for word production and comprehension: Evidence from the semantic blocking paradigm. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2008, 25:493-527.
12. Caramazza A. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1997, 14:177-208.
13. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J. DRC: A dual route cascade model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 2001, 108:204-256.
14. Damian M.F., Als L.C. Long-lasting semantic context effects in the spoken production of object names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:1372-1384.
15. Damian M.F., Vigliocco G., Levelt W.J.M. Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition 2001, 81:B77-B86.
16. de Saussure, F. (1972). Cours de linguistique générale (edited by Charles Bally) (3rd ed., 1st edition published 1916). Paris, FR: Payot.
17. Dell G.S. A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 1986, 83:283-321.
18. Dell G.S., Schwartz M.F., Martin N., Saffran E.M., Gagnon D.A. Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review 1997, 104:801-838.
19. *Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39:175-191.
20. Gerhand S. Routes to reading: A report of a non-semantic reader with equivalent performance on regular and exception words. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:1473-1484.
21. Gieselmann, L. (2008). Semantisch-lexikalische Enkodierung beim Wortabruf [Lexical-semantic encoding in lexical retrieval] (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
22. Hills T.T., Maouene M., Maouene J., Sheya A., Smith L. Longitudinal analysis of early semantic networks: Preferential attachment or preferential acquisition?. Psychological Science 2009, 20:729-739.
23. Howard D., Nickels L., Coltheart M., Cole-Virtue J. Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition 2006, 100:464-482.
24. Hsaio E.Y., Schwartz M.F., Schnur T.T., Dell G.S. Temporal characteristics of semantic perseverations induced by blocked-cyclic picture naming. Brain and Language 2009, 108:133-144.
25. Humphreys G.W., Lamote C., Lloyd-Jones T.J. An interactive activation approach to object processing: Effects of structural similarity, name frequency, and task in normality and pathology. Memory 1995, 3:535-586.
26. Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J., Quinlan P.T. Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1988, 5:67-103.
27. Janssen N., Carreiras M., Barber H.A. Electrophysiological effects of semantic context in picture and word naming. NeuroImage 2011, 57:1243-1250.
28. Kroll J.F., Stewart E. Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language 1994, 33:149-174.
29. Levelt W.J.M. Speaking: From intention to articulation 1989, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. Levelt W.J.M., Roelofs A., Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:1-75.
31. McCarthy R.A., Kartsounis L.D. Wobbly words: Refractory anomia with preserved semantics. Neurocase 2000, 6:487-497.
32. Navarrete E., Mahon B., Carmazza A. The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition. Acta Psychologica 2010, 134:279-289.
33. Oppenheim G.M., Dell G.S., Schwartz M.F. The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition 2010, 114:227-262.
34. Pisoni A., Papagno C., Cattaneo Z. Neural correlates of the semantic interference effect: New evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscience 2012, 223:56-67.
35. Rasch, B., Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Naumann, E. (2010a). G*Power Ergänzungen zu Kapitel 7 aus Rasch et al. (2010b) [G*Power supplement to Rasch et al. (2010b)]. http://www.quantitative-methoden.de/Dateien/Auflage3/Band_II/Kapitel_7_GPower_Ergaenzungen_A3.pdf.
36. Rasch B., Friese M., Hofmann W., Naumann E. Quantitative Methoden [Quantitative methods] 2010, Springer, Heidelberg. 3rd ed.
37. Rodd J.M. When do leotards get their spots? Semantic activation of lexical neighbors in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2004, 11:434-439.
38. Runnqvist E., Strijkers K., Alario F.X., Costa A. Cumulative semantic interference is blind to language: Implications for models of bilingual speech production. Journal of Memory and Language 2012, 66:365-377.
39. Sartori G., Lombardi L., Mattiuzzi L. Semantic relevance best predicts normal and abnormal name retrieval. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:754-770.
40. Schade U. Konnektionistische sprachproduktion [Connectionist language production] 1999, Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden, Germany.
41. Schnur T.T., Schwartz M.F., Brecher A., Hodgson C. Semantic interference during blocked-cyclic naming: Evidence from aphasia. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 54:199-227.
42. Schnur T.T., Schwartz M.F., Kimberg D.Y., Hirshorn E., Coslett H.B., Thompson-Schill S.L. Localizing interference in blocked cyclic naming: Convergent neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence for the function of Broca's area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106:322-327.
43. Scott R.M., Wilshire C.E. Lexical competition for production in a case of nonfluent aphasia: Converging evidence from four different tasks. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2010, 27:505-538.
44. Steyvers M., Tenenbaum J. The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science 2005, 29:41-78.
45. Thompson-Schill S.L., Botvinick M.M. Resolving conflict: A response to Martin and Cheng (2006). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2006, 13:402-408.
46. Vigliocco G., Vinson D.P., Damian M.F., Levelt W.J.M. Semantic distance effects on object and action naming. Cognition 2002, 85:B61-B69.
47. Vigliocco G., Vinson D.P., Lewis W., Garrett M.F. Representing the meanings of object and actions words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology 2004, 48:422-488.
48. Vinson D.P., Vigliocco F.G. A semantic analysis of grammatical class impairments: Semantic representations of object nouns, action nouns and action verbs. Journal of Neurolinguistics 2002, 15:317-351.
49. Vinson D.P., Vigliocco G. Semantic feature norms for a large set of objects and events. Behavior Research Methods 2008, 40:183-190.
50. Vinson D.P., Vigliocco G., Cappa S., Siri S. The breakdown of semantic knowledge: Insights from a statistical model of meaning representation. Brain and Language 2003, 86:347-365.
51. Wheeldon L.R., Monsell S. The locus of repetition priming of spoken word production. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1992, 44:723-761.
52. Wheeldon L.R., Monsell S. Inhibition of spoken word production by priming a semantic competitor. Journal of Memory and Language 1994, 33:332-356.
53. Wilshire C.E. Cognitive neuropsychological approaches to word production in aphasia: Beyond boxes and arrows. Aphasiology 2008, 22:1019-1053.
54. Wirth M., Abdel Rahman R., Künecke J., König T., Horn H., et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on behaviour and electrophysiology of language production. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:3989-3998.
55. Wu D.H., Martin R.C., Damian M.F. A third route for reading? Implications from a case of phonological dyslexia. Neurocase 2002, 8:274-295.