Interval evidential reasoning algorithm for requirements prioritization

Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing

Volumn 132 AISC, Issue , 2012, Pages 915-922

  Voola, Persis ^a   Vinaya Babu, A ^b  

^a ADIKAVI NANNAYA UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); DEGREE OF SATISFACTION; EVIDENTIAL REASONING; REQUIREMENTS PRIORITIZATION;

INFORMATION USE;

EID: 84880386980     PISSN: 18675662     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-27443-5_105     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Donald, G.: Fire Smith Prioritising Requirements. Journal of Object Technology 3(8) (September-October 2004
2. Hermann, A., Daneva: Requirements Prioritization Based on Benefit and Cost Prediction: An agenda for Future Research. In: Proc. of the Intl. Conf. Requirements Engineering (RE 2008), pp. 125-134 (2008)
3. Glinz, M.: Stakeholders in Requirements Engineering. IEEE Software 28(1), 18-20, ISSN 0740-7459
4. Damian, D.: Stakeholders in Global Requirements Engineering:Lessons Learned from Practice. IEEE Software 24(2), 21-27 (2007), doi:10.1109/MS.2007.55
5. Mendelow, A.: Stakeholder Mapping. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Information Systems, Cambridge, MA (1991)
6. Mc Geeu, R.A.: Stakeholder Identification and Quality Attribute Prioritisation for a Global Vehicle Control System. In: Proc. of the Fourth European Conference on Software Architecture, ISBN/ISSN: 978-1-4503-0179-4
7. Stakeholder Analysis, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stakeholder-analysis
8. Freeman, R.E., Reed, D.L.: Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on Corporate Governance. Calfornia Management Review 25(3), 88-106 (1983)
9. Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill (1980)
10. Voola, P., Vinaya Babu, A.: Quality Case and A Simplified Approach to Quality Attributes Prioritization. In: Proc. of the International Conference on Frontiers of Computer Science., IISc, Bangalore, India, ISBN: 978-81-921929-0-1
11. Regnell, B., Host, M., et al.: An Industrial Case Study on Distributed Prioritisation in Market Driven Requirements Engineering for Packaged Software. Requiremnets Eng. 6(1), 51-62 (2001) ISSN:09473602
12. Boehm, B.W., Fairley, R.E.: Software Estimation Perspectives. IEEE Software, 22-26 (November/December
13. Xu, D-L., Yang, J-B., Wang, Y-M.: The evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research 174, 1914-1943 (2006), doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.064
14. Nguyen, H.T., Kreinovich, V., Zuo, Q.: Interval Valued Degrees of Belief: Applications of Interval Computations to Expert Systems and Intelligent Control. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 5(3), 317-358 (1997)
15. Karlsson, J., Ryan, K.: A Cost Value Approach for Prioritising Requirements. IEEE Software 14(5), 67-74
16. Wiegers, K.: First Things First: Prioritizing Requirements. Software Development 7(9) (September 1999
17. http://www.theiba.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Body of Knowledge BABOK Guide 2.0
18. Xu, D-L., Yang, J-B.: Intelligent Decision System for Self-Assessment. Journal of Multi Criteria Decision Analysis 12, 43-60 (2003), doi:10.1002/media.343
19. Yang, J., Xu, D.L.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Applied to Safety and Cost Synthesis. Journal of UK Safety and Reliability Society 21(2) ISSN: 0961-7353
20. Huynh, V-N.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making Under Uncertainty: The Evidential Reasoning Approach Revisited. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, http://hdl.handle.net/2115/14531
21. Chin, K-S., Yang, J-B., et al.: An Evidential Reasoning Interval Based Method for New Product Design Assessment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 56(1), doi:10.1109/TEM.2008.2009792
22. Wang, Y-M., Yang, J-B., et al.: Environmental Impact Assessment using the Evidential Reasoning Approach. European Journal of Operational Research 174 (2006), doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.059