Administrative Law as Regulation

Regulating Law

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages

  Cane, Peter ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Administrative law; Contract law; Government contracts; High collins; Public law; Regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880378150     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264070.003.0011     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. J, Black, 'Decentring Regulation: Understanding Regulation and Selfregulation in a "Post-regulatory World"', Current Legal Problems, 54 (2001), 103.
2. J. Black, 'Constitutionalising Self-regulation', Modem Lam Review, 59 (1996), 24.
3. C. Harlow and R. Rawlings, Law and Administration, 2nd edn. (London; Butterworth, 1997), chs. 1 and 2.
4. Collins, Regulating Contracts, 5, 10.
5. Collins, Regulating Contracts, 315.
6. A. C. L. Davies, Accountability: A Public Law Analysis of Government by Contract (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), ch. 3.
7. P. P. Craig, 'Constitutions, Property and Regulation', Public Law (1991), 538;
8. M. Taggart, 'Public Utilities and Public Law', in P. A. Joseph (ed.), Essays on the Constitution (Wellington: Brookers, 1995);
9. T. Prosser, 'Public Service Law: Privatization's Unexpected Offspring', Law and Contemporary Problems, 63 (2000), 63.
10. J. L. Mashaw, Greed, Chaos and Governance: Using Public Choice to Improve Public Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997), ch. 5, esp. 111-18.
11. R. B. Stewart, 'The Reformation of American Administrative Law', Harvard Law Review, 88 (1975), 1699.
12. Bishop, 'A Theory of Administrative Law', 491-2;
13. R. D. Cooter, The Strategic Constitution (Princeton; Princeton University Press, 2000), 195-8.
14. F. B. Cross, 'The Judiciary and Public Choice', Hastings Law Journal, 50 (1999) 355.
15. E. R. Elhauge, 'Does Interest Group Theory Justify More Intrusive Judicial Review?', Yale Law Journal, 101 (1991), 31.
16. P. Cane, 'Theory and Values in Public Law', in P, Craig and R. Rawlings (eds.), Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow (Oxford; Oxford University Press, 2003), ch. 1.
17. C. Scott, 'The Juridification of Regulatory Relations in the UK Utilities Sector', in J. Black, P. Muchlinski, and P. Walker (eds.), Commercial Regulation and Judicial Review (Oxford; Hart, 1998).
18. P. J. Galligan, Due Process and Fair Procedures (Oxford; Oxford University Press, 1996
19. T. R. S. Allan, 'Procedural Fairness and Ac Duty of Respect', Oxford journal of Legal Studies, 18 (1998), 497.
20. J. Black, 'Proceduralising Regulation, Part I', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 20 (2000), 597
21. P. Cane, 'Tort Law as Regulation', Common Law World Review, 31 (2002), 305, 314-15.
22. P. Cane, 'The Constitutional Basis of Judicial Remedies in Public Law', in P. Leyland and T. Woods (eds.), Administrative Law Facing the Future: Old Constraints and New Horizons (London: Blackstone, 1997), 262-268.
23. P. Cane, 'Damages in Public Law', Otago Law Review, 9 (1999), 489.
24. R. Creyke, J, McMillan, and D. Pearce, 'Success at Court: Does the Client Win?', in J, McMillan (ed.), Administrative Law under the Coalition Government (Canberra: Australian Institute of Administrative Law, 1997), 239.
25. E. D. Elliott, 'To the Chevron Station; An Empirical Study of American Administrative Law', Duke Law Journal (1990), 984, 1059-60.
26. C. Harlow, 'Administrative Reaction to judicial Review', Public Law (1976), 116;
27. T. Prosser, 'Politics and judicial Review: The Atkinson Case and its Aftermath', Public Law (1979), 59;
28. T. Prosser, Test Cases for the Poor (London: Child Poverty Action Group, 1983), ch. 5;
29. L. Bridges, C. Game, O. Lomas, J. McBride, and S. Ranson, Legality and Local Politics (Aldershot: Avebury, 1987)
30. M. Loughlin and P. M. Quinn, 'Prisons, Rules and Courts: A Study in Administrative Law', Modem Law Review, 56 (1993), 497.
31. G. Richardson and M. Sunkin, 'Judicial Review: Questions of Impact', Public Law (1996), 79.
32. I. Loveland, 'Housing Benefit: Administrative Law and Administrative Practice', Public Administration, 66 (1988), 57;
33. I. Loveland, Housing Homeless Persons: Administrative Law and the Administrative Process (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995);
34. S. Halliday, 'The Influence of Judicial Review on Bureaucratic Decision-Making', Public Law (2000), 110.
35. G. Richardson and D. Machin, 'Judicial Review and Tribunal Decision-Making: A Study of the Mental Health Review Tribunal', Public Law (2000), 494.
36. M. Sunkin and K. Pick, 'The Changing Impact of Judicial Review: The Independent Review Service of the Social Fund', Public Law (2001), 736.
37. T. Buck, 'Judicial Review and the Discretionary Social Fund', in Buck (ed.), Judicial Review and Social Welfare (London: Pinter, 1998).
38. M. Sunkin and A. P. Le Sueur, 'Can Government Control Judicial Review?', Current Legal Problems, 44 (1931), 161;
39. Sunkin and Pick, 'The Changing Impact of Judicial Review', 736;
40. R. Creyke and J. McMillan, 'Executive Perceptions of Administrative Law: An Empirical Study', Australian Journal of Administrative Law, 9 (2002), 163.
41. M, Loughlin and P. M. Quinn, 'Prisons, Rules and Courts: A Study in Administrative Law', Modem Law Review, 56 (1993), 497.
42. P. Cane, 'Understanding Judicial Review and its Impact', in M. Hertogh and S. Halliday (eds.), The Impact of Judicial Review; International and Interdisciplinary Dimensions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).
43. T. Mullen, K. Pick, and T. Prosser, judicial Review in Scotland (Chichester: Wiley, 1996), 113.
44. Sunkin and Pick, 'The Changing Impact of Judicial Review', 745
45. G. Richardson and M. Sunkin, 'Judicial Review: Questions of Impact', Public Law (1996), 100.
46. Halliday, 'The Influence of Judicial Review of Bureaucratic Decision-Making', 111-12
47. Richardson and Sunkin, 'Judicial Review', 101.
48. C. Harlow, 'A Special Relationship? American Influences on Judicial Review in England', in I. Loveland (ed.), A Special Relationship? American Influences on Public Law in the UK (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), 96-7.
49. Prosser, Test Cases for the Poor, 69-73.