Social media and community engagement in trials using exception from informed consent

Circulation

Volumn 128, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 206-208

  Chretien, Katherine C ^a  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY INTEGRATION; CONSULTATION; COST CONTROL; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; OUT OF HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; RACE; RESUSCITATION; REVIEW; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIAL STATUS; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

EDITORIALS; EMERGENCIES; ETHICS; INFORMED CONSENT; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORKING;

CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; DISCLOSURE; FEMALE; HEART ARREST; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; SOCIAL MEDIA; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 84880369078     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: 15244539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003575     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. National Archives and Records Administration. Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Volume 1, 21CFR50.24. Revised as of April 1, 2012.
2. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for informed institutional review boards, clinical investigators and sponsors: exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research. March 2011, Updated April 2013. http://www. fda.gov/downloads/ RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM249673.pdf. Accessed on May 28, 2013.
3. Triner W, Jacoby L, Shelton W, Burk M, Imarenakhue S, Watt J, Larkin G, McGee G. Exception from informed consent in emergency medical research: attitudes and awareness. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:187-191.
4. Mosesso VN Jr, Brown LH, Greene HL, Schmidt TA, Aufderheide TP, Sayre MR, Stephens SW, Travers A, Craven RA, Weisfeldt ML; PAD Trial Investigators. Conducting research using the emergency exception from informed consent: the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) trial experience. Resuscitation. 2004;61:29-36.
5. Halperin H, Paradis N, Mosesso V, Nichol G, Sayre M, Ornato JP, Gerardi M, Nadkami VM, Berg R, Becker L, Siegler M, Collins M, Cairns CB, Biros MH, Vanden Hoek T, Peberdy MA. Recommendations for implementation of community consultation and public disclosure under the Food and Drug Administration's Exception from Informed Consent Requirements for Emergency Research. Circulation. 2007;116:1855-1863.
6. Chretien KC, Kind T. Social media and clinical care: ethical, professional, and social implications. Circulation. 2013;127:1413-1421.
7. Stephens S, Williams C, Gray R, Kerby JD, Wang HE. Preliminary experience with social media for community consultation and public disclosure in exception from informed consent trials. Circulation. 2013;128:267-270.
8. Zickur K, Smith A. Digital Differences. Pew Internet & American Life Project. April 13, 2012. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Digitaldifferences. aspx. Accessed May 28, 2013.
9. Feero S, Hedges JR, Stevens P. Demographics of cardiac arrest: association with residence in a low-income area. Acad Emerg Med. 1995;2:11-16.
10. Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, Williams MV, Moody-Ayers S. Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:537-546.
11. Braunstein JB, Sherber NS, Schulman SP, Ding EL, Powe NR. Race, medical researcher distrust, perceived harm, and willingness to participate in cardiovascular prevention trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2008;87:1-9.