Sectoral analysis of the causal relationship between electricity consumption and real output in Pakistan

Energy Policy

Volumn 60, Issue , 2013, Pages 885-891

  Tang, Chor Foon ^a   Shahbaz, Muhammad ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^b COMSATS Institute of Information Technology   (Pakistan)

^c NATIONAL COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AND ECONOMICS   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Electricity consumption; Granger causality; Sectoral

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL SECTOR; CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS; ELECTRICITY CONSERVATION; ELECTRICITY-CONSUMPTION; GRANGER CAUSALITY; NO ADVERSE IMPACTS; POLICY IMPLICATIONS; SECTORAL;

AGRICULTURE; ECONOMICS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; MANUFACTURE; PUBLIC POLICY; STATISTICAL TESTS;

AGGREGATES;

COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY CONSERVATION; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; MANUFACTURING; SERVICE SECTOR;

PAKISTAN;

EID: 84880333272     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.077     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abid M., Sebri M. Energy consumption-economic growth nexus: does the level of aggregation matter?. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 2012, 2:55-62.
2. Abosedra S., Baghestani H. New evidence on the causal relationship between United States energy consumption and gross national product. Journal of Energy and Development 1989, 14:285-292.
3. Abosedra S., Dah A., Ghosh S. Electricity consumption and economic growth, the case of Lebanon. Applied Energy 2009, 86:429-432.
4. Ahmad S. Explaining Pakistan's High Growth Performance Over the Past Two Decades: Can it be Sustained? 1994, World Bank.
5. Aqeel A., Butt M.S. The relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in Pakistan. Asia-Pacific Development Journal 2001, 8:101-110.
6. Baum C.F., Barkoulas J.T., Caglayan M. Long memory or structural breaks: can either explain nonstationary real exchange rates under the current float?. Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money 1999, 9:359-376.
7. Binh P.T. Energy consumption and economic growth in Vietnam: threshold cointegration and causality analysis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 2011, 1:1-17.
8. Bowden N., Payne J.E. The causal relationship between U.S. energy consumption and real output: a disaggregated analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling 2009, 31:180-188.
9. Bowden N., Payne J.E. Sectoral analysis of the causal relationship between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real output in the US. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 2010, 5:400-408.
10. Cheng B.S. An investigation of cointegration and causality between energy consumption and economic growth. Journal of Energy and Development 1995, 21:73-84.
11. Chontanawat J., Hunt L.C., Pierse R. Does energy consumption cause economic growth?: Evidence from a systematic study of over 100 countries. Journal of Policy Modeling 2008, 30:209-220.
12. Clemente J., Montañés A., Reyes M. Testing for a unit root in variables with a double change in the mean. Economics Letters 1998, 59:175-182.
13. Dolado J.J., Lütkepohl H. Making wald tests work for cointegrated VAR systems. Econometric Reviews 1996, 15:369-386.
14. Ghali K.H., El-Sakka M.I.T. Energy use and output growth in Canada: a multivariate cointegration analysis. Energy Economics 2004, 26:225-238.
15. Ghosh S. Electricity consumption and economic growth in India. Energy Policy 2002, 30:125-129.
16. Gross C. Explaining the (non-) causality between energy and economic growth in the U.S.-a multivariate sectoral analysis. Energy Economics 2012, 34:489-499.
17. Hey Q.M.A., Riaz S. Causality between energy consumption and economic growth: the case of Pakistan. Lahore Journal of Economics 2008, 13:45-58.
18. Johansen S. Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 1988, 12:231-254.
19. Johansen S. Testing weak exogeneity and the order of cointegration in UK money demand data. Journal of Policy Modeling 1992, 14:313-334.
20. Johansen S. Likelihood-based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Auto-regressive Models 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. Johansen S., Juselius K. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with-applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1990, 52:169-210.
22. Khan M.A., Qayyum A., Ahmad E. Dynamic modelling of energy and growth in South Asia. Pakistan Development Review 2007, 46:481-498.
23. Kraft J., Kraft A. On the relationship between energy and GNP. Journal of Energy Development 1978, 3:401-403.
24. Liew K.S., Nathan T.M., Wong W.K. Are sectoral outputs in Pakistan led by energy consumption. Economics Bulletin 2012, 32:2326-2331.
25. Lütkepohl H. Non-causality due to omitted variables. Journal of Econometrics 1982, 19:367-378.
26. Mahmoodi M., Mahmoodi E. Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: the case of 7 Asian developing countries. American Journal of Scientific Research 2011, 35:146-152.
27. Mantalos P. A graphical investigation of the size and power of Granger causality tests in integrated-cointegrated VAR systems. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 2000, 4:17-33.
28. Masih A.M.M., Masih R. Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality: results from a multi-country study based on cointegration and error-correction modelling techniques. Energy Economics 1996, 18:165-183.
29. Mozumder P., Marathe A. Causality relationship between electricity consumption and GDP in Bangladesh. Energy Policy 2007, 35:395-402.
30. Murry D.A., Nan G.D. A definition of the gross domestic product-electrification interrelationship. Journal of Energy and Development 1994, 19:275-283.
31. Mushtaq K., Abbas F., Abedullah, Ghafoor A. Energy use for economic growth: cointegration and causality analysis from the agriculture sector of Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review 2007, 46:1065-1073.
32. Narayan P.K., Singh B. The electricity consumption and GDP nexus for the Fiji Islands. Energy Economics 2007, 29:1141-1150.
33. Narayan P.K., Smyth R. Electricity consumption, employment and real income in Australia evidence from multivariate Granger causality tests. Energy Policy 2005, 33:1109-1116.
34. Osterwald-Lenum M. A note with quantiles of the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood cointegration rank test statistics. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1992, 54:461-472.
35. Ozturk I. A literature survey on energy-growth nexus. Energy Policy 2010, 38:340-349.
36. Payne J.E. A survey of the electricity consumption-growth literature. Applied Energy 2010, 87:723-731.
37. Perron P. The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 1989, 57:1361-1401.
38. Perron P., Vogelsang T.J. Nonstationarity and level shifts with an application to purchasing power parity. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1992, 10:301-320.
39. Podivinsky J.M. Testing misspecified cointegration relationships. Economics Letters 1998, 60:1-9.
40. Pradhan R.P. Energy consumption-growth nexus in SAARC countries: using cointegration and error-correction model. Modern Applied Science 2010, 4:74-90.
41. Reinsel G.C., Ahn S.K. Vector autoregressive models with unit roots and reduced rank structure: estimation, likelihood ratio test and forecasting. Journal of Time Series Analysis 1992, 13:353-375.
42. Shahbaz M., Feridun M. Electricity consumption and economic growth empirical evidence from Pakistan. Quality & Quantity 2012, 46:1583-1599.
43. Shahbaz M., Lean H.H. The dynamics of electricity consumption and economic growth: a revisit study of their causality in Pakistan. Energy 2012, 39:146-153.
44. Shahbaz M., Tang C.F., Shahbaz Shabbir M. Electricity consumption and economic growth nexus in Portugal using cointegration and causality approaches. Energy Policy 2011, 39:3529-3536.
45. Shahbaz M., Zeshan M., Afza T. Is energy consumption effective to spur economic growth in Pakistan? New evidence from bounds test to level relationships and Granger causality tests. Economic Modelling 2012, 29:2310-2319.
46. Shiu A., Lam P.L. Electricity consumption and economic growth in China. Energy Policy 2004, 32:47-54.
47. Shukur G., Mantalos P. A simple investigation of the Granger-causality test in integrated-cointegrated VAR systems. Journal of Applied Statistics 2000, 27:1021-1031.
48. Soytas U., Sari R. Energy consumption and income in G-7 countries. Journal of Policy Modeling 2006, 28:739-750.
49. Soytas U., Sari R. The relationship between energy and production: evidence from Turkish manufacturing industry. Energy Economics 2007, 29:1151-1165.
50. Stern D.I. A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy. Energy Economics 2000, 22:267-283.
51. Tang C.F. A re-examination of the relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth in Malaysia. Energy Policy 2008, 36:3077-3085.
52. Tang C.F. Electricity consumption, income, foreign direct investment, and population in Malaysia: new evidence from multivariate framework analysis. Journal of Economic Studies 2009, 36:371-382.
53. Tang C.F., Tan E.C. Electricity consumption and economic growth in Portugal: evidence from a multivariate framework analysis. Energy Journal 2012, 33:23-48.
54. Toda H.Y., Yamamoto T. Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics 1995, 66:225-250.
55. Yu E.S.H., Jin J.C. Cointegration tests of energy consumption, income, and employment. Resources and Energy 1992, 14:259-266.
56. Yuan J.H., Kang J.G., Zhao C.H., Hu Z.G. Energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from China at both aggregated and disaggregated levels. Energy Economics 2008, 30:3077-3094.
57. Zachariadis T. Exploring the relationship between energy use and economic growth with bivariate models: new evidence from G-7 countries. Energy Economics 2007, 29:1233-1253.
58. Zachariadis T., Pashourtidou N. An empirical analysis of electricity consumption in Cyprus. Energy Economics 2007, 29:183-198.
59. Zaman B., Farooq M., Ullah S. Sectoral oil consumption and economic growth in Pakistan: an ECM approach. American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 2011, 2:149-156.
60. Zivot E., Andrews D.W.K. Further evidence of the great crash, the oil-price shock and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1992, 10:251-270.